Sat Jul 03, 2010 10:35 pm
Did the Malaysian's think that they were buying into a joint ownership or taking control of the club? We always knew that PMG were not likely to pay a penny more into the club, but were they also aware this would be the case? Were they expect PMG to "pull their weight" or stand aside?
I just can't understand why they would buy a 30 odd % stake in the club yet be prepared to pay 100% of the running costs.