This is a term that has popped up on this board since the situation involving the possible return of Sam was made public. I wonder how many people see it that way. A lot of people who trust TG (and I am deffo in that camp) may find themselves compromised if TG decides it is the best option for him and the club if Sam is given a role has head oncho over football matters.
Will these people then turn on TG or will they trust his judgement,was Gethin employed by TG or even Borley, if not were they part of the interview process or told by PMG this is who we are employing and like it or lump it.
Has Gethin done enough to impres TG he's the right man for the job because it would appear that he ain't impressed Steve Borley, will he be given more time to prove himself, or as TG seen enough to want to change things around, and at the end of the day, does TG have enough of a say to make those sort of changes anyway, and whilst on the subject of does TG have enough say to change things, in that case if TG is impressed by what Sam has to say and offer, will that be enough to bring Sam back on board in any sort of role.
Will people like Michael Isaacs have a major say in such a move, and will TG have enough support from other directors or shareholders to bring any such a change about.
Also If Tg does want to bring Sam back in and does not get enough support, how do you see that leaving TG and will he still be interested in propping up the club.
Lot's of iffs and buts and a lot of mileage left in this yet. Also from what I'm hearing there is a bit of shifting amongst the camps as often happens when power struggles or boardroom unrest is apparent, people will soon be seen changing allegiances if they see a shift in the power base is likely to happen.
All makes for busy message boards and back pages of news papers.