Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:37 pm
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:39 pm
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:40 pm
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:44 pm
Vintage 63 wrote:could be a very good case of TG calling people's bluff then , IF it does happen then Im sure they have the correct reasons and I for 1 will back them 100 %
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:45 pm
Owain wrote:I'm pretty sure Mike wasn't being serious.
Just more rumours!
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:49 pm
m4morris wrote:Owain wrote:I'm pretty sure Mike wasn't being serious.
Just more rumours!
my mum phoned me to tell me that a bloke was telling people outside ticket office that we were going into administration on thursday.
no reliable source, no facts, i just thought it funny (not that it's a laughing matter), how these things kick off.
My mum was worried enough to ring me and tell me we were going bust because this bloke had said so
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:53 pm
m4morris wrote:Owain wrote:I'm pretty sure Mike wasn't being serious.
Just more rumours!
my mum phoned me to tell me that a bloke was telling people outside ticket office that we were going into administration on thursday.
no reliable source, no facts, i just thought it funny (not that it's a laughing matter), how these things kick off.
My mum was worried enough to ring me and tell me we were going bust because this bloke had said so
Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:56 pm
m4morris wrote:Owain wrote:I'm pretty sure Mike wasn't being serious.
Just more rumours!
my mum phoned me to tell me that a bloke was telling people outside ticket office that we were going into administration on thursday.
no reliable source, no facts, i just thought it funny (not that it's a laughing matter), how these things kick off.
My mum was worried enough to ring me and tell me we were going bust because this bloke had said so
Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:30 pm
Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:38 pm
Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:39 pm
Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:10 pm
wez 1927 wrote:http://www.ccmb.co.uk/fudforum/index.php?t=msg&th=225901&start=0&rid=0&S=8f73b0e02b1c834a6b5aa9f570eeabc0
cant see it myself they will lose millions even if they are sercured creditors
Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:37 pm
since62 wrote:wez 1927 wrote:http://www.ccmb.co.uk/fudforum/index.php?t=msg&th=225901&start=0&rid=0&S=8f73b0e02b1c834a6b5aa9f570eeabc0
cant see it myself they will lose millions even if they are sercured creditors
"THERE(SIC) SAYING ON CCMB"
No they are not - read it properly.
Mike was just pointing out how rumours start - this time seemingly by some random bloke stood outside the stadium and how dangerous such rumours are as there is always someone who believes them!!
And Langston are NOT secured creditors - unless they have been granted security in the last few days and it has not yet been registered at Companies House.And for it to be valid security , they would have had to advance new money to the club - you cannot take security for money already advanced - legally that is known as a preference and would be ruled invalid and void by any Administrator if one was appointed.