why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:19 pm
i still dont see why we let him go,didnt cost us much in wages and seemed a backup for josh. 
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:26 pm
krab wrote:i still dont see why we let him go,didnt cost us much in wages and seemed a backup for josh.
Yes he would provide great cover for himself
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:28 pm
krab wrote:i still dont see why we let him go,didnt cost us much in wages and seemed a backup for josh.
He was a different option and a lot harder than many of the players we've got. IMO it was a bad judgement by Jones.
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:29 pm
BluebirdWalker wrote:krab wrote:i still dont see why we let him go,didnt cost us much in wages and seemed a backup for josh.
Yes he would provide great cover for himself
sorry that should be jay.he seemed decent enough when i watched in the youth.
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:30 pm
krab wrote:i still dont see why we let him go,didnt cost us much in wages and seemed a backup for josh.
He's total shite thats why... Div 2 or conference at best.
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:39 pm
how can a little short arse pacey attacker be cover for a technical, and skilled target man ? 
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:41 pm
Merlin wrote:how can a little short arse pacey attacker be cover for a technical, and skilled target man ?
for a technical, and skilled target man ... HA HA HA!
Re: why did we let josh maguiness go.
Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:50 pm
Daya wrote:krab wrote:i still dont see why we let him go,didnt cost us much in wages and seemed a backup for josh.
He's total shite thats why... Div 2 or conference at best.
