Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:46 am
Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:48 am
Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:50 am
Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:54 am
Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:56 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
I thought Naughts played well yesterday. And if you play well you keep the shirt. Someone comes in Koumas included should fight for there shirt. Competition is a fantastic thing to have. Drinkvodka sorry Ross would not agree with that tho
Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:00 am
Vintage 63 wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
I thought Naughts played well yesterday. And if you play well you keep the shirt. Someone comes in Koumas included should fight for there shirt. Competition is a fantastic thing to have. Drink Vodka sorry Ross would not agree with that tho
Naughts was my man of the match yesterday and will defo keep the shirt but will it be right or left back or will Naylor keep the bench warm which seems more likely ?
Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:05 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
I thought Naughts played well yesterday. And if you play well you keep the shirt. Someone comes in Koumas included should fight for there shirt. Competition is a fantastic thing to have. Drinkvodka sorry Ross would not agree with that tho
Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:22 am
Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:13 am
Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:15 am
PtB wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
They move one of them into the centre and drop Hudson with any luck!
Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:21 am
Nuclearblue wrote:PtB wrote:Vintage 63 wrote:His performance at full back yesterday was fully justified in leaving Matthews on the bench , dunno what happens to Naughts when Naylor signs tho ?
They move one of them into the centre and drop Hudson with any luck!
Drop him back off at Charlton would be the best idea...
Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:24 am
Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:18 pm
Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:26 pm
Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:02 pm
Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:21 pm
Merlin wrote:Although I agree with McNaughton being man of the match yesterday, Darcey was outstanding. If all the players put as much effort in as hed did we would have won 4-0!
Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:58 am
Nuclearblue wrote:For me he is one of our best players we have at the club. And to think we nearly got rid of the kid on a free that is no slight on Jones as we know Darcy's attitude wasn't right. But something has switched on with Darcy and the kid is steamrolling forwards and his versatility is fantastic. It makes me wonder If Jones puts Darcy's name first on his team sheet. Wherever he plays he plays well. Keep it up kid .