Good man Sam

He is going to pay Bellamys wages but will want £15 million in return if we go up.

Could it be SB ??????

Could it be SB ??????

More realistic, yes.

He is going to pay Bellamys wages but will want £15 million in return if we go up.

And if we don't he's happy to lose the £2million it would cost him?

£15million is too much of a return. We will need that money to pay off debts and stay up without taking another £15million from the golden pot. Double his money at most, no more.

He is going to pay Bellamys wages but will want £15 million in return if we go up.

And if we don't he's happy to lose the £2million it would cost him?

£15million is too much of a return. We will need that money to pay off debts and stay up without taking another £15million from the golden pot. Double his money at most, no more.

Depends on how the £15m is made up. If the £15m includes everything (the Langston debt/naming rights/promotion bonus) then paying Sam the WHOLE amount in one go next year when we get promoted would make fantastic business sense.

that sounds right. i wouldn't be surprised if it's sam, that's his chance to get on board.

Carl said in his post it was a Cardiff businessman

Depends on how the £15m is made up. If the £15m includes everything (the Langston debt/naming rights/promotion bonus) then paying Sam the WHOLE amount in one go next year when we get promoted would make fantastic business sense.

That sounds better. But the 10mill becomes 24 mill in December so doubt it's a goer.

Depends on how the £15m is made up. If the £15m includes everything (the Langston debt/naming rights/promotion bonus) then paying Sam the WHOLE amount in one go next year when we get promoted would make fantastic business sense.

That sounds better. But the 10mill becomes 24 mill in December so doubt it's a goer.

Of course we don't know if the businessman is Sam Hammam, but it does sound like one of his schemes. The £10m turning into £24m is a very complex matter and would involve going back to court at the very least.

If it is Sam then I can see both his and TG's finger prints all over what looks like a great deal for everyone.

Depends on how the £15m is made up. If the £15m includes everything (the Langston debt/naming rights/promotion bonus) then paying Sam the WHOLE amount in one go next year when we get promoted would make fantastic business sense.

That sounds better. But the 10mill becomes 24 mill in December so doubt it's a goer.

Wayne

People seem to be getting a bit muddled about this £10m v £24m point.

The debt due to Langston shown in the 2009 accounts is in fact about £26m (£15m plus interest on the main debt plus a further £9m related to naming rights) not £10m.

So , if the debt is not settled at £10m before the end of the year , there won`t be a further liability to allow for. What it will be is a missed opportunity ro substantially reduce a liability which is already in the books at the full amount.

Keith