worcester_ccfc wrote:Biggest shock so far as Mexico beat Germany 1-0.
worcester_ccfc wrote:Sweden beat South Korea 1-0.
pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Sweden beat South Korea 1-0.
Var taking over the decision of the ref after Sweden players surrounded ref appealing for var after ref said no pen! Looking at it could say player played for pen as was on way down before got to Korean player. What happened to it being a deliberate foul?:old:
worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Sweden beat South Korea 1-0.
Var taking over the decision of the ref after Sweden players surrounded ref appealing for var after ref said no pen! Looking at it could say player played for pen as was on way down before got to Korean player. What happened to it being a deliberate foul?:old:
Stonewall penalty I thought.
pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Sweden beat South Korea 1-0.
Var taking over the decision of the ref after Sweden players surrounded ref appealing for var after ref said no pen! Looking at it could say player played for pen as was on way down before got to Korean player. What happened to it being a deliberate foul?:old:
Stonewall penalty I thought.
Was that immediately or after slow motion replay? The ref didn't think so and I understood only clear and obvious errors were to be referred? What's the point of referee if var official is going to make decisions for him? I read if ref makes a decision that he sees and plays on then it shouldn't be reviewed? Var is asked to review a decision if it's made not actually tell ref hes wrong when refs sees incident! Linos are told not to flag for close offsides incase a goal is scored then ref can ask to review it but if lino flags var cannot be used, Var as missed several clear errors which it's suppose to see but instead is telling ref to look at things hes seen thats wrong
worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Sweden beat South Korea 1-0.
Var taking over the decision of the ref after Sweden players surrounded ref appealing for var after ref said no pen! Looking at it could say player played for pen as was on way down before got to Korean player. What happened to it being a deliberate foul?:old:
Stonewall penalty I thought.
Was that immediately or after slow motion replay? The ref didn't think so and I understood only clear and obvious errors were to be referred? What's the point of referee if var official is going to make decisions for him? I read if ref makes a decision that he sees and plays on then it shouldn't be reviewed? Var is asked to review a decision if it's made not actually tell ref hes wrong when refs sees incident! Linos are told not to flag for close offsides incase a goal is scored then ref can ask to review it but if lino flags var cannot be used, Var as missed several clear errors which it's suppose to see but instead is telling ref to look at things hes seen thats wrong
VAR are checking everything while the match is going on. That’s why he stopped the game, because VAR suggested he should look at the incident again.
Some incidents the referee doesn’t review, because VAR officials have no issue with the original decision.
It’s an unpopular opinion, but I think VAR has been good on the most part so far - more correct decisions than if it wasn’t there.
pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Sweden beat South Korea 1-0.
Var taking over the decision of the ref after Sweden players surrounded ref appealing for var after ref said no pen! Looking at it could say player played for pen as was on way down before got to Korean player. What happened to it being a deliberate foul?:old:
Stonewall penalty I thought.
Was that immediately or after slow motion replay? The ref didn't think so and I understood only clear and obvious errors were to be referred? What's the point of referee if var official is going to make decisions for him? I read if ref makes a decision that he sees and plays on then it shouldn't be reviewed? Var is asked to review a decision if it's made not actually tell ref hes wrong when refs sees incident! Linos are told not to flag for close offsides incase a goal is scored then ref can ask to review it but if lino flags var cannot be used, Var as missed several clear errors which it's suppose to see but instead is telling ref to look at things hes seen thats wrong
VAR are checking everything while the match is going on. That’s why he stopped the game, because VAR suggested he should look at the incident again.
Some incidents the referee doesn’t review, because VAR officials have no issue with the original decision.
It’s an unpopular opinion, but I think VAR has been good on the most part so far - more correct decisions than if it wasn’t there.
Your right var checks everything but it is suppose to only come in if an obvious mistakes been made, as there been an obvious mistake by ref so far? Ffs the greesman pen took ultra slow motion to show him touching defender with is foot was that obvious mistake? Open to opinion if was a foul And the hardball pen took freeze frame picture to show it touched players hand! Var can do this so but cannot spot an obvious mistake for swiz goal when defender was clearly pushed? guess we have to accept var is now the referee and the ref just watches game!!
pembroke allan wrote:ps as there actually been pen awarded directly by ref? Never seen so many pens given so early in comp the refs must be crap if var as to give decisions
Forever Blue wrote:Iran 0 Spain 1
Users browsing this forum: Bytespider [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 175 guests