The official reason for disallowed pen!

A forum for all things Cardiff City

The official reason for disallowed pen!

Postby pembroke allan » Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:55 am

Apparently ref didn't see handball linesman who one doubts was able to see it given he was on wrong side pitch but gave pen ref points to spot then goes over to linesman during conversation the other linesman standing 40/50yrds away intervenes and said ball came off his head 1st? Now that means generally its not a pen as not deliberate and contact was unavoidable, may not agree but correct decision was made but you must question how any of the officials saw what they did standing in their respective positions? Gunners pen claim recon linesman saw it as was close to incident but wouldn't flag because of the pen farce :roll:
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 17631
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff

The official reason for disallowed pen!

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: The official reason for disallowed pen!

Postby Lawnmower » Mon Apr 15, 2019 5:19 pm

The biggest farce was that it was the previous handball from the shot that should have been given for a penalty.
He’s blocked it with his hand at the side of his body, which he could have moved.

If he’d moved it then we may we’ll have scored as the keeper was unsighted
Lawnmower
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:39 pm

burnley goal

Postby actionman » Mon Apr 15, 2019 6:33 pm

Should have been disallowed for Ashley Barnes offside and interfering with keeper?.
actionman
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:01 pm

Re: burnley goal

Postby epping blue » Mon Apr 15, 2019 6:47 pm

actionman wrote:Should have been disallowed for Ashley Barnes offside and interfering with keeper?.



Jesus Christ. I thought he was just blocking his view.
epping blue
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: burnley goal

Postby epping blue » Mon Apr 15, 2019 6:47 pm

actionman wrote:Should have been disallowed for Ashley Barnes offside and interfering with keeper?.



Jesus Christ. I thought he was just blocking his view.
epping blue
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:09 pm

Re: The official reason for disallowed pen!

Postby pembroke allan » Mon Apr 15, 2019 6:48 pm

Lawnmower wrote:The biggest farce was that it was the previous handball from the shot that should have been given for a penalty.
He’s blocked it with his hand at the side of his body, which he could have moved.

If he’d moved it then we may we’ll have scored as the keeper was unsighted


Yes most say arta shot was a pen rather than disallowed pen? Not getting one shout for pen ok but 4 appeals 2 of which were obvious pens smacks of bias at worst or incompetence at best :old:
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 17631
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: burnley goal

Postby pembroke allan » Mon Apr 15, 2019 6:51 pm

epping blue wrote:
actionman wrote:Should have been disallowed for Ashley Barnes offside and interfering with keeper?.



Jesus Christ. I thought he was just blocking his view.



He was passively blocking his view but but as was interfering with view and also standing offside when ball kicked that makes him active so if var in operation would been disallowed :thumbup:
User avatar
pembroke allan
 
Posts: 17631
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:00 pm
Location: Cardiff



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bluebina, bluebirdsCCFC, Cinderford_Davies_Blue, cmorris1927, Deep Blue FC, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], neilst, Runman10m, salopiancity, troobloo3339, Wolfpac and 344 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.