Craig Pawson
Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 5:54 pm
Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
Cardiff City FC Forum/Messageboard - for all things Cardiff City FC
https://cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
Dbenson1991 wrote:At least the lineo was actually paying attention. Better than that other tit he had running the line in the Chelsea game!
Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
Sven wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
So did the assistant change the decision or the referee (you know, the guy with the whistle)?
Both ultimately did their jobs; unlike in the Chelsea game
epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
So did the assistant change the decision or the referee (you know, the guy with the whistle)?
Both ultimately did their jobs; unlike in the Chelsea game
Don't under estimate the influence of the Leeds players. If they'd just rolled over and accepted it, I have no doubt that penalty would have stood.
Sven wrote:epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
So did the assistant change the decision or the referee (you know, the guy with the whistle)?
Both ultimately did their jobs; unlike in the Chelsea game
Don't under estimate the influence of the Leeds players. If they'd just rolled over and accepted it, I have no doubt that penalty would have stood.
No disputing that; but only the referee can overturn his own decision; albeit acting on advice
City had a penalty (against them) overturned against Southampton, I think? We didn't make a big deal out of that, as we didn't when Mendez-Laing got a penalty for an out-of-sight 'air shot' against ManUre yesterday?
I'm not defending Pawson. I'm just stating it was ultimately his decision either way
epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
So did the assistant change the decision or the referee (you know, the guy with the whistle)?
Both ultimately did their jobs; unlike in the Chelsea game
Don't under estimate the influence of the Leeds players. If they'd just rolled over and accepted it, I have no doubt that penalty would have stood.
No disputing that; but only the referee can overturn his own decision; albeit acting on advice
City had a penalty (against them) overturned against Southampton, I think? We didn't make a big deal out of that, as we didn't when Mendez-Laing got a penalty for an out-of-sight 'air shot' against ManUre yesterday?
I'm not defending Pawson. I'm just stating it was ultimately his decision either way
I doubt that's in question. I'm still bleating about our lack of any sort of appeal from our players for the offside goals particularly against Chelsea and Burnley and to a lesser extent Palace. We'll never know for sure, but there was a possibility they could have over.
epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:epping blue wrote:Sven wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Sven wrote:dorsetblue wrote:Useless tit, at it again in the playoff games. How many bad decisions can this bloke make.
He got the penalty decision right in the end and overturned it
No he didn'ti It was the linesmans decision. The same linesman we had.
So did the assistant change the decision or the referee (you know, the guy with the whistle)?
Both ultimately did their jobs; unlike in the Chelsea game
Don't under estimate the influence of the Leeds players. If they'd just rolled over and accepted it, I have no doubt that penalty would have stood.
No disputing that; but only the referee can overturn his own decision; albeit acting on advice
City had a penalty (against them) overturned against Southampton, I think? We didn't make a big deal out of that, as we didn't when Mendez-Laing got a penalty for an out-of-sight 'air shot' against ManUre yesterday?
I'm not defending Pawson. I'm just stating it was ultimately his decision either way
I doubt that's in question. I'm still bleating about our lack of any sort of appeal from our players for the offside goals particularly against Chelsea and Burnley and to a lesser extent Palace. We'll never know for sure, but there was a possibility they could have over.