Cardiff City Football Forum | Cardiff City FC Messageboard

Hmmm Dalman/ Charlton/ Red Club / Dalman frontman for Tan? ?

London club.


Does seem fishy

I feel something.


Opinions?

We are probably at our most saleable at this present time with a further 2 years of parachute payments available.

Possible

Forever Blue wrote:Hmmm Dalman/ Charlton/ Red Club / Dalman frontman for Tan? ?

London club.


Does seem fishy

I feel something.


Opinions?

That's a very good point, though he would have to sell us first. Hope our parachute money doesn't end up at Charlton!

I've mentioned before that the clubs communications and PR are very poor.
They really should be making a statement on all this.

I've mentioned before that the clubs communications and PR are very poor.
They really should be making a statement on all this.

Vincent Tan was here before Dalman and will be here after him.

Nothing in this apart from possibly Dalman going onto a new venture.

Anybody hoping Tan leaves this club is a idiot, he is by far the best owner this club has ever had, even with the rebrand mistake.

It will be a very sad day if he sells up, he is a very good owner and probably one of the best in the country

Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

Of course, this is just for hits/bites. Dalman might go but it will be totally independent of Tan.

If Tan did want a red club in England, he would have to sell his blue one from Wales first.

JimCP91 wrote:Of course, this is just for hits/bites. Dalman might go but it will be totally independent of Tan.

If Tan did want a red club in England, he would have to sell his blue one from Wales first.

you naive fool. I pity you

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

ThomasC wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

Exactly Thomas , they are not reading .

Dalman front man, Tan not on any paper work ?

JimCP91 wrote:Of course, this is just for hits/bites. Dalman might go but it will be totally independent of Tan.

If Tan did want a red club in England, he would have to sell his blue one from Wales first.

Pardon?

How do you know this might be happening ?

Are we not allowed to debate?

If this is your opinion of just for hits, wrong forum

Forever Blue wrote:

ThomasC wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

Exactly Thomas , they are not reading .

Dalman front man, Tan not on any paper work ?

Are there are things in place to stop what you're suggesting otherwise other clubs would done it by now? So didn't read it wrongly just saying like as people cannot put in money in other club if own another in same country just like ffp! Or am I wrong? I didn't make it clear in original post

pembroke allan wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

ThomasC wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

Exactly Thomas , they are not reading .

Dalman front man, Tan not on any paper work ?

Are there are things in place to stop what you're suggesting otherwise other clubs would done it by now? So didn't read it wrongly just saying like as people cannot put in money in other club if own another in same country just like ffp! Or am I wrong? I didn't make it clear in original post

Ps should change heading as it clearly infers tan to buy club so what is it buying or investing ? And if tan invests in clandestine way as your suggesting that's illegal as you know!

Allen, just another stick to beat Mr Tan with, no doubt some will be happy when he goes but then will have to find something else to gripe about ( I'm only adding to debate mind)

ThomasC wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

really ?

UEFA and FA ruling forbid owning two clubs in the same professional league structure and/or competition.

Forever Blue wrote:

ThomasC wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

Exactly Thomas , they are not reading .

Dalman front man, Tan not on any paper work ?

Like the time sullivan tried to buy us in his brothers name? It doesn't happen and won't happen.

Just a shame this was made up, not sure if for hits on forum or scaremongering as part of an anti tan campaign.

WelshPatriot wrote:

Forever Blue wrote:

ThomasC wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:Annis if your saying hes thinking of buying Charlton 1st needs to sell city 2nd dalman in report says hes wanted to buy club and be the chairman/owner ... or is your post headline wrong?

why does he need to sell City first exactly?

Exactly Thomas , they are not reading .

Dalman front man, Tan not on any paper work ?

Like the time sullivan tried to buy us in his brothers name? It doesn't happen and won't happen.

Just a shame this was made up, not sure if for hits on forum or scaremongering as part of an anti tan campaign.

After 11 years this forum certainly does not need to make up stuff for the sake of a few extra hits

If you can read? then you will see I was asking a question, I never once said it had happened, are we not allowed to ask questions or are you a dictator? ??

And you never know there could be some substance in the question


If you don't like the forum, there is certainly others you can look at

thomasblue wrote:Vincent Tan was here before Dalman and will be here after him.

Nothing in this apart from possibly Dalman going onto a new venture.

Anybody hoping Tan leaves this club is a idiot, he is by far the best owner this club has ever had, even with the rebrand mistake.

It will be a very sad day if he sells up, he is a very good owner and probably one of the best in the country

Yes I agree,but to some he is the devil incarnate I think he is the best owner we have had in my time,without doubt.Imagine for one moment,where we would more than likely be without him,l hope he stays around for a lot longer,made one rather large error,and imho has gone a long way,to put it right.people seeking his selling up should be careful what they wish for,it could be a whole lot worse,a whole lot.

bluesince62 wrote:

thomasblue wrote:Vincent Tan was here before Dalman and will be here after him.

Nothing in this apart from possibly Dalman going onto a new venture.

Anybody hoping Tan leaves this club is a idiot, he is by far the best owner this club has ever had, even with the rebrand mistake.

It will be a very sad day if he sells up, he is a very good owner and probably one of the best in the country

Yes I agree,but to some he is the devil incarnate I think he is the best owner we have had in my time,without doubt.Imagine for one moment,where we would more than likely be without him,l hope he stays around for a lot longer,made one rather large error,and imho has gone a long way,to put it right.people seeking his selling up should be careful what they wish for,it could be a whole lot worse,a whole lot.

agree ,most successful time has be with him in charge

thomasblue wrote:Vincent Tan was here before Dalman and will be here after him.

Nothing in this apart from possibly Dalman going onto a new venture.

Anybody hoping Tan leaves this club is a idiot, he is by far the best owner this club has ever had, even with the rebrand mistake.

It will be a very sad day if he sells up, he is a very good owner and probably one of the best in the country

Agree