Undisclosed?

I see that the reports on Ross say that an "undisclosed" fee has been agreed between the two clubs.

Why is it undisclosed?
Who decides whether it should be disclosed or undisclosed?

Does it really mean that we want it undisclosed because we've received only a small amount for him or do Leeds not want to disclose that they've paid too much for him?

I suppose perhaps we don't want other clubs to know how much we recived as they may increase their asking price for players/loans and Leeds don't want other clubs to know how much they're willing to pay for players.

I'm sure Carl will give us a pretty good idea of the fee anyway!

Alot of clubs do this, unless they are the likes of Chelsea & Man City. I think it's so the creditors don't go chasing after them, like they did with us and Bellamy. All the best Rosco!

Don't worry it will soon be known, always does.

I think it's always undisclosed by the club's whoever they are. I don't think they tend to disclose unless it's like an club record or something. I think most of the time it gets disclosed then by the player or the agent.

Clubs never say how much they pay anymore.

undisclosed, could mean a record fee,,,,,,,, well they paid 12 million for robbie fowler + more for others, so im happy with the deal