Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:18 pm
Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:20 pm
Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:47 pm
Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:49 pm
taffyapple wrote:Surely by doing that they'd be refusing the man the chance to ply his trade
Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:58 pm
Bromley Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Surely by doing that they'd be refusing the man the chance to ply his trade
That point would only stand if Man City stopped him from earning.
Nobody being paid millions of pounds can claim his employer is stopping him from plying his trade.
Wed Aug 25, 2010 3:14 pm
taffyapple wrote:Bromley Bluebird wrote:taffyapple wrote:Surely by doing that they'd be refusing the man the chance to ply his trade
That point would only stand if Man City stopped him from earning.
Nobody being paid millions of pounds can claim his employer is stopping him from plying his trade.
Understood. But the man is a footballer, he wants to play football, if he's not being given
the opportunity to play football at Man City then I'm sure he would have a pretty good case
against them if they tried to stop him leaving. The PFA etc would be right on them about it