Sam hammam suing ccfc for 15 million

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

yes I was told Sunday..
I sort of get the Issacs one.. but 15 mill for lifetime president ?

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

Tough cheddar really. Plenty of shareholders have lost out over the years because additional shares have been created to raise much needed cash. Anyone holding shares in the banks that were bailed out by the taxpayer will have seen their shares plummet as more were created to help them continue to trade. Afraid that's the business for you. If shares were a guaranteed way of making money without any chance of losing, everyone would be a shareholder.

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

Tough cheddar really. Plenty of shareholders have lost out over the years because additional shares have been created to raise much needed cash. Anyone holding shares in the banks that were bailed out by the taxpayer will have seen their shares plummet as more were created to help them continue to trade. Afraid that's the business for you. If shares were a guaranteed way of making money without any chance of losing, everyone would be a shareholder.

Agree ,Isaacs should of taken the share offer borley and co did

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

yes I was told Sunday..
I sort of get the Issacs one.. but 15 mill for lifetime president ?

Mad init he got his money ,he should just bugger off

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

Tough cheddar really. Plenty of shareholders have lost out over the years because additional shares have been created to raise much needed cash. Anyone holding shares in the banks that were bailed out by the taxpayer will have seen their shares plummet as more were created to help them continue to trade. Afraid that's the business for you. If shares were a guaranteed way of making money without any chance of losing, everyone would be a shareholder.

Agree ,Isaacs should of taken the share offer borley and co did

Spot on wez

This cannot be true as Sam would never do anything to hurt the club he loves would he?

Tan hasn't half been involved some litigation since he has been here. no sooner one thing is sorted another court case looms on the horizon. is it him or is it just the way it is ?

On mike Morris board ,they are saying that sam hammam is trying to sue ccfc for 15m because they never gave him the non directors roll of life president, the mans on drugs if this is true 15m for a title ,also saying that Michael Isaacs is suing tan because his shares have been diluted so much by tans debt to shares conversions wish these two would f**k off

Spot on Wez

Pair of jokers, good luck with that

Tan hasn't half been involved some litigation since he has been here. no sooner one thing is sorted another court case looms on the horizon. is it him or is it just the way it is ?

Vultures wanting a piece of his money I suspect, he beat langstone(settle for half the amount supposedly owed) ,beat malky (no pay off) ,

Good luck to both of them think they are both pissing in the wind though if true.

It was confirmed at Fridays meeting Sam is chasing the Dollar once again.

Eff off Sam you were great at the time but you were simply a gambler. As for Isaacs BOO HOO... shares are not risk averse and the risk is you can gain/lose money. Otherwise try using your ISA allowance you clown

It was confirmed at Fridays meeting Sam is chasing the Dollar once again.

Hangs around like a bad smell you just can't get rid of.

His pension pot must be getting low so he's looking for some way to top it up.

The good things he did for the club (of which there were many) have now been far outweighed by his actions since he left.

As I can see your all dying to know

The figure is wrong

Plus it was the case that was ordered in the high court a few years ago against Tan, but once again some of the money was paid and then it stopped once again and will once again cost our club more interest and solicitors / lawyers fees through incompetence. But as usual spin is out on this .

300,000 a year Hamman paid himself

It was confirmed at Fridays meeting Sam is chasing the Dollar once again.

Hangs around like a bad smell you just can't get rid of.

His pension pot must be getting low so he's looking for some way to top it up.

The good things he did for the club (of which there were many) have now been far outweighed by his actions since he left.

got to say, poster after poster will say they want to be debt free , and if there is profit in last years accounts hardly anyone will take issue with it going off the debt...
so its ok for Tan to be paid whats owed. but not Sam..?
if he is claiming 15 mill over not being lifetime president its a bit ludicrous
if its what Annis says and its unpaid debt its not.

It was confirmed at Fridays meeting Sam is chasing the Dollar once again.

Hangs around like a bad smell you just can't get rid of.

His pension pot must be getting low so he's looking for some way to top it up.

The good things he did for the club (of which there were many) have now been far outweighed by his actions since he left.

got to say, poster after poster will say they want to be debt free , and if there is profit in last years accounts hardly anyone will take issue with it going off the debt...
so its ok for Tan to be paid whats owed. but not Sam..?
if he is claiming 15 mill over not being lifetime president its a bit ludicrous
if its what Annis says and its unpaid debt its not.

That’s 100% bullshit regarding claim , the claim is for the money owed and ordered by the High Court.
Tan lost totally in the High Court , costing £1mill in costs and the High Court ordering Tan to post an extra £2mill.
For a court case that once again the usual suspects said Tan would win. Tan had yet to win a court case on behalf of our club and so £mill upon £mill have been wasted

This is my last post on the subject and you will all once again see in the court papers not what Tan will tell media Wales.


ONLY SOMEONE SIMPLE WOULD BELIEVE THSTS ITS £15MILL OVER A LIFE PRESIDENCY

And the usual suspects will be on here Allan with his usual sly dig the point is Tan lost end off .

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

doubt its Sam his debt leaves with him doesnt it

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

With all that's going on if I was Tan I would say stuff you all and sell the club.

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

Lose them their ground so he could make a few million !

With all that's going on if I was Tan I would say stuff you all and sell the club.

im sure he would if someone came along with a wedge.

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

Lose them their ground so he could make a few million !

he had bought the ground.. which by the way they were not playing 1st team football on or had played on for years and was not somewhere suitable to build a new stadium..
so yes he probably did make a few quid when he sold it, people tend to if they sell something. but so did Wimbledon when they sold him the ground.. Wimbledon, who were a top tier club at that time made no efforts to buy it off him either..
so he lost them a ground they did not play on and didn't try to buy.. yep I heard some of their beaut fans talking nonsense at the time..

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

Lose them their ground so he could make a few million !

Wimbledon were league 4 when Sam arrived took them to Top flight football with home gates of 4,000 & away support of sometimes 20 fans, always in Top 10 and beat Liverpool FA Cup Final and was never ever relegated.
It went wrong for Wimbledon under new owners Norwegians.
I have been up there on many many occasions and the majority of fans love Sam still, just a few like you down here who don't.

Funny before Sam came to Cardiff our crowds were 3,000. Later on the main moaners were the new glory hunters, were you one of them Allan?

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

Lose them their ground so he could make a few million !

Wimbledon were league 4 when Sam arrived took them to Top flight football with home gates of 4,000 & away support of sometimes 20 fans, always in Top 10 and beat Liverpool FA Cup Final and was never ever relegated.
It went wrong for Wimbledon under new owners Norwegians.
I have been up there on many many occasions and the majority of fans love Sam still, just a few like you down here who don't.

Funny before Sam came to Cardiff our crowds were 3,000. Later on the main moaners were the new glory hunters, were you one of them Allan?

yes ive met Wimbledon fans that love him too.. and ones that blame him for anything and everything.. including selling that ground that was of little use to their club and which he not Wimbledon owned..

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

Lose them their ground so he could make a few million !

Wimbledon were league 4 when Sam arrived took them to Top flight football with home gates of 4,000 & away support of sometimes 20 fans, always in Top 10 and beat Liverpool FA Cup Final and was never ever relegated.
It went wrong for Wimbledon under new owners Norwegians.
I have been up there on many many occasions and the majority of fans love Sam still, just a few like you down here who don't.

Funny before Sam came to Cardiff our crowds were 3,000. Later on the main moaners were the new glory hunters, were you one of them Allan?

yes ive met Wimbledon fans that love him too.. and ones that blame him for anything and everything.. including selling that ground that was of little use to their club and which he not Wimbledon owned..

Exactly

Was this not settled in court years ago? And why years later he's suppose to be claiming 15m ? Was it not 15m that was/should been paid after court case? He always seem to be screwing clubs he owned out of money one way or other like Wimbledon

apart from taking a non league club the the prem
what did he do at Wimbledon ?

Lose them their ground so he could make a few million !

Wimbledon were league 4 when Sam arrived took them to Top flight football with home gates of 4,000 & away support of sometimes 20 fans, always in Top 10 and beat Liverpool FA Cup Final and was never ever relegated.
It went wrong for Wimbledon under new owners Norwegians.
I have been up there on many many occasions and the majority of fans love Sam still, just a few like you down here who don't.

Funny before Sam came to Cardiff our crowds were 3,000. Later on the main moaners were the new glory hunters, were you one of them Allan?

yes ive met Wimbledon fans that love him too.. and ones that blame him for anything and everything.. including selling that ground that was of little use to their club and which he not Wimbledon owned..

Exactly

they were playing at Selhurst Park in the top tier.. a new ground had been a topic for a number of years but not a new ground built on Plough Lane as it was not suitable...Sam sold 80% of Wimbledon and later sold Plough Lane. listen to some and they make it sound like he had sold the ground they played on..
I know this. if Sam had not come here the chances are id still be watching mid table 4th division football. there would be no CCS and none of us would know who Vincent Tan is... and as you hinted at in a previous post there really were not many of us that actually remember where we were and how hopeless it was..

I do