Right lets do this one at a time so we can work through this together. The answers are actually in your own post so you're almost there. I'm sure we'll get there if we pull together on this one.
CCFCJosh75 wrote:I'll start with the 'good side' comment. This is what you originally put (not with what you added) 'Do you remember a while back Josh when I asked you if you were sure you were sure you were on the side of the good guys? I'll be honest with you here, I'm really starting to think your could be on the bad guys team for sure.'
Ok so far so good we seem to be on the same page-ish.
CCFCJosh75 wrote:That was posted after listing how everyone is left wing.
drifting a little here but still on track. I did say everything that I listed as
bad was left wing not the broader everyone, but maybe i'm being picky so let's just go with that
CCFCJosh75 wrote:This heavily implies you interpret BLM and all left wing as bad
Yep spot on so far
CCFCJosh75 wrote: and wlm and right wing are good. Wlm are the neo Nazis.
Ok so now you're contradicting yourself because as
you just pointed out I said everyone I listed was left wing and then suggesting I've put the neo-nazis down as part of the right ergo on the 'good guys' side. You see the fatal flaw in your logic there? You literally said the sentence before that I had listed everyone as left and then said I inferred they were on the right.
Now I might think that you missed this bit by accident it was a long post so that could be possible.
But then that doesn't really explain how you've then suddenly recovered from your mid-post amnesia and remembered just a few lines later within the same post that I said the Nazis are left wing. In fact, you then went on to make quite a big deal out of the fact that I said the nazis were left wing across another three or four posts.
It's OK mate, given the amount of mental gymnastics you have to go through to justify some of the shite you come out with, I'd struggle to keep up with it all as well. We all make mistakes from time to time so I'll give you a pass. I'm sure you didn't mean to infer I was pro neo-nazi maliciously or anything. It just kinda slipped out I guess?
CCFCJosh75 wrote: As for the Nazis are left wing comment. The addition of socialism to their name was propaganda to get working class votes. The actual socialist and left wing parities were banned and their leaders were exiled or sent to concentration camps. The night of the long knives got rid of the lefter leaning members of the Nazi party. During ww2 Britain also had a lot of state control. I suppose that means the conservative party is also left wing. I suppose the thousands of historians, books, documentaries etc are all just ignorant. What are your sources for the claim by the way?
Just given you one in a different post, but for reference, I'm coming from this having read Hegel, Marx, Solzhenitsyn, Darwin, Orwel, Nietzsche and yes Mein Kampf amongst others so do have some limited understanding of what the nuances between fascism, marxism and nazism.
But evidently not as much as you, so thanks for clearing up the whole 'they only used the word socialism as a con' bit. Never, heard that before but everything is now so much more abundantly clear.
In that vein perhaps you could help me clarify my understanding a bit further.
Tell me what exactly are your thoughts on the differences between the marxist and nazi positions on evolutionary legal theory? I'd also love to hear your interpretation of how the Hegalian dialectic was differently perceived by the Nazis and the Marxists? Perhaps you could outline the differences between the Nazis 'protective custody’ and the Soviet's 'People's Courts' - they always seemed fairly similar to me in practice - what am I missing?
CCFCJosh75 wrote:The KKK weren't founded by democrats. What's your source for that lie?
Josh, just because you don't know something it doesn't mean it is a lie. Here you go here is a nice bit of propaganda from those evil right wing bigots at the History channel
https://www.history.com/topics/reconstr ... -klux-klanA little snippet to help you out
The Evil Lying Bigots at the History Channel wrote:Founded in 1865, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for Black Americans.
Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and Black Republican leaders.
Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.
CCFCJosh75 wrote: I'll ignore the petty name calling. I suppose it tells us all there is to know about you.
You do realise you were the one who accused me of being pro neo-nazi right? But look like i say I'm sure that was a misunderstanding rather than just a quick an easy way out to dodge having to answer the more challenging questions of the post.
So I am happy to apologise unreservedly for suggesting you were left wing. I can see how that would offend you and I'm sorry,. I've taken some time out to think about how I would feel if someone said that to me on an internet message board and I know it would probably make me feel quite sad. In fact, I'd probably have to head to my safe space if I'm honest, so I realise now how wrong that was. It was said in anger, but it was still wrong and I'm sorry.
I promise I will never, infer that you are a left wing comrade ever again.
Anyway thats me done. Time for bed. I'll happily respond to any other queries you have in the morning.