Page 1 of 1
tony pulis
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:50 am
by skiprat
Has an affinity with us he he used to watch us as a boy. Good fit for us with current squad/ regime?.
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:04 am
by Bonner
No no no ... not at all what we need to move forward
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2021 5:01 pm
by Sneggyblubird
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:15 am
by Sven
Apparently, it was Newpot...
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:48 am
by bluesince62
Sven wrote:Apparently, it was Newpot...
Talking of Newport, very unlucky tonight against a prem team again,the penalty shoot out was amazing,5 penalties saved,1 hit the post,it was a shame no replays,but understand the reasons behind it,in fact I say keep it that way,there must be a winner in the day of the tie,teams be more inclined to go for it I think.
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:08 pm
by skidemin
Bonner wrote:No no no ... not at all what we need to move forward
isnt appointing a manager with a decent track record is moving forward....
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:40 pm
by jamie1927
skidemin wrote:Bonner wrote:No no no ... not at all what we need to move forward
isnt appointing a manager with a decent track record is moving forward....
Appointed the guy who was just sacked at Wednesday with them staring relegation in the face? No thanks
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:10 pm
by skidemin
jamie1927 wrote:skidemin wrote:Bonner wrote:No no no ... not at all what we need to move forward
isnt appointing a manager with a decent track record is moving forward....
Appointed the guy who was just sacked at Wednesday with them staring relegation in the face? No thanks
so judge a blokes whole career on a few games.
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:18 pm
by piledriver64
skidemin wrote:jamie1927 wrote:skidemin wrote:Bonner wrote:No no no ... not at all what we need to move forward
isnt appointing a manager with a decent track record is moving forward....
Appointed the guy who was just sacked at Wednesday with them staring relegation in the face? No thanks
so judge a blokes whole career on a few games.
Presumably using his logic he wouldn't be too happy if Eddie Howe came after getting Bournemouth relegated !!!???
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:24 pm
by jamie1927
All of you moaning about shit football yet want Pulis appointed? Couldn't make it up, absolute dinosaur of a manager.
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:28 pm
by Sven
jamie1927 wrote:All of you moaning about shit football yet want Pulis appointed? Couldn't make it up, absolute dinosaur of a manager.
That does seem a bit weird...!
Luckily, Pulis
NOT on the list of potentials
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:37 pm
by skidemin
jamie1927 wrote:All of you moaning about shit football yet want Pulis appointed? Couldn't make it up, absolute dinosaur of a manager.
a few pretentious pete playstationers are moaning... ironic really as most of them also loved Malkys time here..
but your original post was about him at Wednesday who were already dog shite and have all sorts going on in the background..
im not a big fan of his but if our board are dismissing out of hand people with decent track records i dont know what to think....
Re: tony pulis
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:46 pm
by piledriver64
Sven wrote:jamie1927 wrote:All of you moaning about shit football yet want Pulis appointed? Couldn't make it up, absolute dinosaur of a manager.
That does seem a bit weird...!
Luckily, Pulis
NOT on the list of potentials
The only thing I would say on that (and I'd much rather Bellamy, Pearson, etc.) is that there is a difference between shit, losing football and shit, winning football
To be fair neither Malky or Warnock played great football but they did win games and, frankly, I don't think we'd be having these conversations if Harris was winning games. However, Harris doesn't even look like winning a game and therefore he needs to go, quickly and we'll take our chances with the replacement.
Pullis has/had a proven record of getting Stoke up, and keeping them up, playing a not too dissimlar style to which our current squad could easily adapt. It wouldn't be pretty and not my chosen approach.
But I can see some merit in him being appointed if there is no money to spend because I think the current squad would actually suit his style.