BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Bonner » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:29 pm

Think current world financial situation might take some relevance .
Bonner
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:32 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Carpe Diem » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:31 pm

What’s “breaking” about this thread? Pure click bait, yet another terrible / misleading title designed purely for hits. I’m done.
Carpe Diem
 
Posts: 5365
Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 9:10 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Bigmarkw » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:52 pm

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=219648
Let’s do something about tan then.
Bigmarkw
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 4:43 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Escott1927 » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:53 pm

Id imagine the current pandemic has delayed that.
Escott1927
 
Posts: 1150
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 9:55 am

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby piledriver64 » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:54 pm

Bigmarkw wrote:https://cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=219648
Let’s do something about tan then.


And then what !!??

Winding up, fire sale of players, Div 1or 2 ?

Get real !!
piledriver64
 
Posts: 2776
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Doyley1927 » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:56 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
Bigmarkw wrote:https://cardiffcityforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=219648
Let’s do something about tan then.


And then what !!??

Winding up, fire sale of players, Div 1or 2 ?

Get real !!


Like when the junior Bluebirds took over the club
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby TopCat CCFC » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:16 am

4 Weeks ..... :thumbup:
User avatar
TopCat CCFC
Moderator
 
Posts: 20265
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 4:40 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Sven » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:42 am

piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him
"Never argue with an idiot; they'll drag you down to their gutter level and beat you with experience!"
User avatar
Sven
Moderator
 
Posts: 19354
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:14 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby moonboots » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:56 am

Forever Blue wrote:
HarriRhys22 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Big Hill Blue wrote:Warnock aside?



Warnock brought in nearly £200 mill through promotion :thumbright: :bluebird:


Yes but he wasted it on crap players and bonus’s and Premier League wages for him and his staff and players!



He spent £50mill quarter of what he brought in and all sanctioned by the famous Committee a fact.

With 2 promotions comes two seasons of premier league wages. It's not as if he brought in £200 million and only spent £50 million leaving a profit of £150 million. It doesn't quite work like that. :thumbup:
moonboots
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:18 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Man of Harlech » Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:35 am

darran1927 wrote:
Mr Shed wrote:The anti Tan bus is doing a proper tour this weekend isnt it?

Not many passengers but plenty of baggage.

Whatever the 5 year plan was, I'm sure it didn't account for a global pandemic or the unfortunate loss of a player that may have changed our fortunes.

Debt free or not, the debt is definitely reducing every year so i as one supporter am happy with that.

Agree with this, I wouldn't expect it during a Pandemic no way could tan have foreseen that and the clubs income greatly reduced[

People have short and selective memory about what it was like before Tan gave us the stability that we have since enjoyed. Some appear to think that we were better managed when we were having to sell everything that wasn't nailed down and were constantly facing living under the threat of winding up orders. Unbelievable.
Man of Harlech
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 3:17 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Bigmarkw » Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:38 am

Some great posts. Seems not everyone is anti tan.
Bigmarkw
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2020 4:43 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Forever Blue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:51 am

Bigmarkw wrote:Some great posts. Seems not everyone is anti tan.



That’s what this forum is all about , different opinions :thumbright: :bluescarf:

All I have stated what Tan stated 5yrs ago :thumbright:
Annis Jnr Author and Publisher of 7 Books.

My 7th Book is Available Now "MY STORY"

http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/books/buy-books/
http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/news/

My email : annisabraham@aol.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/annisabraham
User avatar
Forever Blue
Admin
 
Posts: 129533
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Forever Blue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:54 am

Bonner wrote:Think current world financial situation might take some relevance .



Way before the virus, Dalman stated there was no money .
Annis Jnr Author and Publisher of 7 Books.

My 7th Book is Available Now "MY STORY"

http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/books/buy-books/
http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/news/

My email : annisabraham@aol.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/annisabraham
User avatar
Forever Blue
Admin
 
Posts: 129533
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby OriginalGrangeEndBlue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:53 am

Mr Shed wrote:The anti Tan bus is doing a proper tour this weekend isnt it?

Not many passengers but plenty of baggage.

Whatever the 5 year plan was, I'm sure it didn't account for a global pandemic or the unfortunate loss of a player that may have changed our fortunes.

Debt free or not, the debt is definitely reducing every year so i as one supporter am happy with that.


I’m definitely happy with Tan as well.
Constantly keeping this club going.

The constant whinging is beyond me.
OriginalGrangeEndBlue
 
Posts: 7265
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:05 am
Location: Cardiff

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby piledriver64 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:59 am

Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.
piledriver64
 
Posts: 2776
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Forever Blue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 10:36 am

piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.
Annis Jnr Author and Publisher of 7 Books.

My 7th Book is Available Now "MY STORY"

http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/books/buy-books/
http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/news/

My email : annisabraham@aol.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/annisabraham
User avatar
Forever Blue
Admin
 
Posts: 129533
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Bakedalasker » Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:15 am

Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


All I will say is that everything is for sale and if the price is right..................
User avatar
Bakedalasker
 
Posts: 16366
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:46 am
Location: Derby

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:32 am

Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


All I will say is that everything is for sale and if the price is right..................


But what is the price?
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby piledriver64 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:35 am

Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


All I will say is that everything is for sale and if the price is right..................


You won't get any disagreement from me on that point.

However, I would say that the grass isn't always greener. There's a pretty long list of clubs that wanted a change at the top and it resulted in absolute carnage.

I want my club to be successful but, even more important, is that I want it to survive as a professional football club.

Our cousins down the road have gone quiet about their ownership and they were desperate for a change before these Americans investors took over. However those problems haven't gone away and if they don't go up this season they will be in a very difficult situation. But it's not only them who have suffered from such a change and that's something we all need to guard against.

The fact that we've had two promotions to the premier league in 7 years makes us one of the more successful teams outside of the Prem, we need to build on that not go backwards.
piledriver64
 
Posts: 2776
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby troobloo3339 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 11:46 am

Big Hill Blue wrote:Warnock aside?

My thoughts also
Got us up yes got us relegated yes
Left us in the shit financialy yes
Let our academy rot for over 2 years yes
Thanks for the memories colin
And vincent tan is the best owner city has had in the last 50+owners
troobloo3339
 
Posts: 6982
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Forever Blue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:01 pm

Doyley1927 wrote:
Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


All I will say is that everything is for sale and if the price is right..................


But what is the price?



I was told by People involved in the negotiations it was £30mill plus the buyer takes all the debts and court cases :shock:
Annis Jnr Author and Publisher of 7 Books.

My 7th Book is Available Now "MY STORY"

http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/books/buy-books/
http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/news/

My email : annisabraham@aol.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/annisabraham
User avatar
Forever Blue
Admin
 
Posts: 129533
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:04 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
Doyley1927 wrote:
Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


All I will say is that everything is for sale and if the price is right..................


But what is the price?



I was told by People involved in the negotiations it was £30mill plus the buyer takes all the debts and court cases :shock:


The debt adds a lot but I think that’s a decent price.

Moore is worth half of that or will be after the euros.

Was that when we were in the premier league or in the championship?
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby BroBlue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:20 pm

He's been a pretty reliable and stable owner for the most part, the rebrand was a disaster but it was reversed and at a huge cost to the man. I don't think he's going to take Cardiff anywhere as he seems to have lost the passion and interest he had in the early days, but that also means Cardiff aren't in any real danger of dropping out of the Championship any time soon.
BroBlue
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2019 2:01 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Forever Blue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:45 pm

Doyley1927 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
Doyley1927 wrote:
Bakedalasker wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


All I will say is that everything is for sale and if the price is right..................


But what is the price?



I was told by People involved in the negotiations it was £30mill plus the buyer takes all the debts and court cases :shock:


The debt adds a lot but I think that’s a decent price.

Moore is worth half of that or will be after the euros.

Was that when we were in the premier league or in the championship?



That adds up to £110mill, plus Sala £20mill, plus Langston could be £5mill


Value of clubs have dropped drastically since Covid.

£135MILL, FOR A MIDDLE OF THE TABLE CHAMPIONSHIP SIDE??
Players not worth very much.
Annis Jnr Author and Publisher of 7 Books.

My 7th Book is Available Now "MY STORY"

http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/books/buy-books/
http://www.annisabraham.co.uk/news/

My email : annisabraham@aol.com
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/annisabraham
User avatar
Forever Blue
Admin
 
Posts: 129533
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby piledriver64 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:10 pm

Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


Well it wasn't reported in any British media outlet which would make it the most secretive bid ever !!

The other point is that even if there were other bids, and I wouldn't be that surprised if there were, we certainly don't know the level of those bids nor whether those people would have the best interests of the club at heart.

They might have just have chanced their arm, made a low bid in the hope that they themselves could then sell it on to another, less trustworthy/suitable bidder. I can think of one person previously involved in the club who has a track record in hiding behind the names of another organisation :roll: :lol:
piledriver64
 
Posts: 2776
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:20 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


Well it wasn't reported in any British media outlet which would make it the most secretive bid ever !!

The other point is that even if there were other bids, and I wouldn't be that surprised if there were, we certainly don't know the level of those bids nor whether those people would have the best interests of the club at heart.

They might have just have chanced their arm, made a low bid in the hope that they themselves could then sell it on to another, less trustworthy/suitable bidder. I can think of one person previously involved in the club who has a track record in hiding behind the names of another organisation :roll: :lol:


Cardiff’s current owners are the only ones who make low bids. Look at poor Crewe. Amateurs.
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby piledriver64 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:36 pm

Doyley1927 wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


Well it wasn't reported in any British media outlet which would make it the most secretive bid ever !!

The other point is that even if there were other bids, and I wouldn't be that surprised if there were, we certainly don't know the level of those bids nor whether those people would have the best interests of the club at heart.

They might have just have chanced their arm, made a low bid in the hope that they themselves could then sell it on to another, less trustworthy/suitable bidder. I can think of one person previously involved in the club who has a track record in hiding behind the names of another organisation :roll: :lol:


Cardiff’s current owners are the only ones who make low bids. Look at poor Crewe. Amateurs.


So one minute you're concerned about the debt and the next you want us to pay whatever another club asks :roll:

Are you that naïve or stupid to think that transfers go through at the first bid. We've started low, let's see where it ends up.

If we want him enough we'll negotiate that, if Crewe are asking silly money then we'll walk away. Simples.

We are, though, in a strong position in that his contract is up in the summer so Crewe either take some sort of fee now or let him walk away for nothing in 4 months time, well worth a low bid in the first instance.
piledriver64
 
Posts: 2776
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 4:45 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby OriginalGrangeEndBlue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:47 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
Doyley1927 wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


Well it wasn't reported in any British media outlet which would make it the most secretive bid ever !!

The other point is that even if there were other bids, and I wouldn't be that surprised if there were, we certainly don't know the level of those bids nor whether those people would have the best interests of the club at heart.

They might have just have chanced their arm, made a low bid in the hope that they themselves could then sell it on to another, less trustworthy/suitable bidder. I can think of one person previously involved in the club who has a track record in hiding behind the names of another organisation :roll: :lol:


Cardiff’s current owners are the only ones who make low bids. Look at poor Crewe. Amateurs.


So one minute you're concerned about the debt and the next you want us to pay whatever another club asks :roll:

Are you that naïve or stupid to think that transfers go through at the first bid. We've started low, let's see where it ends up.

If we want him enough we'll negotiate that, if Crewe are asking silly money then we'll walk away. Simples.

We are, though, in a strong position in that his contract is up in the summer so Crewe either take some sort of fee now or let him walk away for nothing in 4 months time, well worth a low bid in the first instance.


Mate, this guy is so obviously a troll I wouldn’t even bother!
OriginalGrangeEndBlue
 
Posts: 7265
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:05 am
Location: Cardiff

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:49 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
Doyley1927 wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


Well it wasn't reported in any British media outlet which would make it the most secretive bid ever !!

The other point is that even if there were other bids, and I wouldn't be that surprised if there were, we certainly don't know the level of those bids nor whether those people would have the best interests of the club at heart.

They might have just have chanced their arm, made a low bid in the hope that they themselves could then sell it on to another, less trustworthy/suitable bidder. I can think of one person previously involved in the club who has a track record in hiding behind the names of another organisation :roll: :lol:


Cardiff’s current owners are the only ones who make low bids. Look at poor Crewe. Amateurs.


So one minute you're concerned about the debt and the next you want us to pay whatever another club asks :roll:

Are you that naïve or stupid to think that transfers go through at the first bid. We've started low, let's see where it ends up.

If we want him enough we'll negotiate that, if Crewe are asking silly money then we'll walk away. Simples.

We are, though, in a strong position in that his contract is up in the summer so Crewe either take some sort of fee now or let him walk away for nothing in 4 months time, well worth a low bid in the first instance.


The debt being extended to be used for purchasing players isn’t necessarily a bad thing. We need players.
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: BREAKING: “ VINCENT TAN / 4 WEEKS “

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:52 pm

OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Doyley1927 wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:
Sven wrote:
piledriver64 wrote:Yep two major issues with the OP.

1. Not sure if you’ve noticed but there’s a global pandemic going on that has wrecked the global economy that nobody, other than the drugs companies !, has done well out of. So any economic plans from 5 years ago are, frankly, knackered !!

2. And probably more importantly, so what if Tan doesn’t deliver on what he promised what’s the alternative? Without Tan pumping millions in per month we get a transfer embargo or, worse, administration. The Tan haters need to get into their heads that there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !! What do you want ? Force Tan out and then what ?

These posts are tiresome and pointless. Tan made a massive mistake in changing our colours. We are now back in blue and our club is financially stable yet some would rather go back to the winding up/embargo days of Hammam and Ridsdale !! I must be thick because I just can’t see any logic in that argument.

Just a correction on your assertion that (quote) "there are no rich investors queuing up to buy us right now" to say that that is not the truth; at least one (and I'm aware of another) 'buyer' has come forward in recent times with the funds and backing to meet the current owner's demands but he (Vincent Tan) changed his mind for reasons best explained by him


But that's just speculation. We've all heard those rumours but there is nothing in the public domain, particularly about the level of funds and ongoing investment offered so I'll clarify; there are no CONFIRMED rich investors queuing up to buy us right now !!

There was some speculation that Sam was also trying to put together a consortium and, understandably, there is no way Tan will let that weasel back in.

I would also suggest there would be doubts over whether Sam would pass the fit and proper person test of the league after his actions at both Wimbledon and us. That's one of the reasons that Tan was so keen to have him identified as the person behind Langston in open court a few years ago.

You have mentioned a tenuous offer to buy but I would repeat that there is no queue of people wanting to take us over.




It’s not rumours, just because media Wales are not printing it , who get it wrong half the time anyway.

Tan/Dalman have been offered twice by two different consortiums.
One pulled out after studying our debts etc and the other Tan withdrew.


Well it wasn't reported in any British media outlet which would make it the most secretive bid ever !!

The other point is that even if there were other bids, and I wouldn't be that surprised if there were, we certainly don't know the level of those bids nor whether those people would have the best interests of the club at heart.

They might have just have chanced their arm, made a low bid in the hope that they themselves could then sell it on to another, less trustworthy/suitable bidder. I can think of one person previously involved in the club who has a track record in hiding behind the names of another organisation :roll: :lol:


Cardiff’s current owners are the only ones who make low bids. Look at poor Crewe. Amateurs.


So one minute you're concerned about the debt and the next you want us to pay whatever another club asks :roll:

Are you that naïve or stupid to think that transfers go through at the first bid. We've started low, let's see where it ends up.

If we want him enough we'll negotiate that, if Crewe are asking silly money then we'll walk away. Simples.

We are, though, in a strong position in that his contract is up in the summer so Crewe either take some sort of fee now or let him walk away for nothing in 4 months time, well worth a low bid in the first instance.


Mate, this guy is so obviously a troll I wouldn’t even bother!


Why because I hold a certain view like most on this forum.

The board used to have lots of people who were Tan lovers but more and more are seeing sense. It’s so much more an anti Tan board lately.
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

PreviousNext


Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluebirdoct1962, bluesince62, Carduff, CF72, Crayfish, Google [Bot], Jestrix, lincoln blue, MoodyBluebird, Ponty Bluebird, Porthy123, skidemin and 493 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.