Same old same old

A forum for all things Cardiff City

Same old same old

Postby troobloo3339 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:09 pm

Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances
troobloo3339
 
Posts: 6996
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:50 pm

Same old same old

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: Same old same old

Postby troobloo3339 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:22 pm

1240 views and not one comment
I put that down to the thread being a positive view ?
troobloo3339
 
Posts: 6996
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby Llantwit Blue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 1:26 pm

Spot on. I was hoping to pay my debts off this year and buy a new car fact I’ve had no income for 10 months probably means I’ll have to put my plans on hold.
Llantwit Blue
 
Posts: 589
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:29 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:04 pm

It’s written like a rap or a poem.

I read it like in tone of Lose Yourself by Eminem
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby RV Casual » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:24 pm

You make some good points to be fair in terms of the time line of the debt free situation.

Nobody could have predicted the Pandemic so your right he deserves not to be held to that 5 year date.
RV Casual
 
Posts: 3635
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:36 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby Always City » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:29 pm

RV Casual wrote:You make some good points to be fair in terms of the time line of the debt free situation.

Nobody could have predicted the Pandemic so your right he deserves not to be held to that 5 year date.


Did i not read last Jan 2020, before the Pandemic, chairman Dalman said he we had no money, money was tight and not spending?
Always City
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:22 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby OriginalGrangeEndBlue » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:43 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances


When you posted on a regular basis here a while back I rarely, if ever, agreed with you.
I won’t repeat what your nickname on here became ..... but on this I agree.

A lot on here are also sycophants I believe which is one reason you may not have had many replies.
OriginalGrangeEndBlue
 
Posts: 7272
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2012 10:05 am
Location: Cardiff

Re: Same old same old

Postby Always City » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:54 pm

OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances


When you posted on a regular basis here a while back I rarely, if ever, agreed with you.
I won’t repeat what your nickname on here became ..... but on this I agree.

A lot on here are also sycophants I believe which is one reason you may not have had many replies.



Mate, 4 promotions , 150 years , half of it don’t make sense?
Always City
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:22 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby JJ1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:57 pm

Not the worst owner but hardly the best. . When he took over we had we have gone from a debt of around 40 million- which given the value of the ground may have allowed us to get negotiate our way out of trouble -to at least treble that.

Too many people fell for the mantra that we would have gone out of existence without Tan. We were in exactly the same position as Southampton and Leicester and look at them now. Big debt, valuable asset that couldn't be used for anything else but sport without the councils assent. They were both put into administration, relegated and came back with the slate wiped clean.

Us and Tan are stuck with each other as the debt is too big to attract any investor unless he agrees to take a huge loss.
JJ1927
 
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:19 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby skidemin » Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:25 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances




no he could not have forseen a pandemic.... but how many of the fans who hated the red but took it up the behind and did not revolt or protest purely for the investment foresaw that all these years later after all the success { and money that comes along with it } that we would be owing him all these millions...
skidemin
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:45 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby troobloo3339 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:13 pm

Always City wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances


When you posted on a regular basis here a while back I rarely, if ever, agreed with you.
I won’t repeat what your nickname on here became ..... but on this I agree.

A lot on here are also sycophants I believe which is one reason you may not have had many replies.



Mate, 4 promotions , 150 years , half of it don’t make sense?

Should of put it differently 2 promotions 2 cup finals
troobloo3339
 
Posts: 6996
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:50 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby skidemin » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:29 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:
Always City wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances


When you posted on a regular basis here a while back I rarely, if ever, agreed with you.
I won’t repeat what your nickname on here became ..... but on this I agree.

A lot on here are also sycophants I believe which is one reason you may not have had many replies.



Mate, 4 promotions , 150 years , half of it don’t make sense?

Should of put it differently 2 promotions 2 cup finals



2 cup finals ?
skidemin
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:45 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby Canton104 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:48 pm

The way the original post was written, I thought it was a poem at first.
Canton104
 
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 6:51 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby Always City » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:53 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:
Always City wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances


When you posted on a regular basis here a while back I rarely, if ever, agreed with you.
I won’t repeat what your nickname on here became ..... but on this I agree.

A lot on here are also sycophants I believe which is one reason you may not have had many replies.



Mate, 4 promotions , 150 years , half of it don’t make sense?

Should of put it differently 2 promotions 2 cup finals


2 cup finals?

and 2 relegations
Always City
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:22 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby Doyley1927 » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:58 pm

Always City wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:
Always City wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Nothing much changes on here
What a crop article about yincent tan
It could of so easily been more supppportive
But no kick in the balllls as usual
Yes im aware of what he said 5 years ago
About wanting us debt free by 2021
Would it not of been more REALISTIC
To give him some slack of about an extra 12 months
As the last year has had the world in a killer pandemic
Yes a killerrr of people and a killer offf businesses
This could not of been foreseeeeen 5 years ago
So just my opppinion but trying to hammer the best owner
This club has had in the last 150+years is rather pathetic
And the fans agreeing with it are the same fans as usual
Those that want yincent tan gone for the one mistake
In his tenure of turning us red from blue
Changed us back to blue has kept us going with more
Winding up ppprocedings paid of langston
Oversaw 4 promotions and wembley appearances


When you posted on a regular basis here a while back I rarely, if ever, agreed with you.
I won’t repeat what your nickname on here became ..... but on this I agree.

A lot on here are also sycophants I believe which is one reason you may not have had many replies.



Mate, 4 promotions , 150 years , half of it don’t make sense?

Should of put it differently 2 promotions 2 cup finals


2 cup finals?

and 2 relegations


One of them was due to the hounding of Malky, the other lack of funds.
Doyley1927
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2021 12:31 pm

Re: Same old same old

Postby skidemin » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:59 pm

Canton104 wrote:The way the original post was written, I thought it was a poem at first.



.its an ODE to Vincent Tan...
seems to be not much middle ground...
skidemin
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 8:45 pm



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 103 Barmy Army, A Quiet Monkfish, Bigmarkw, Blue78, Bluebird1949, bluebirdoct1962, Crayfish, Elwood Blues, Google [Bot], jamie1927, Majestic-12 [Bot], Matt the Bluebird, mm3260, newblue57, NPCF3, Penboy, scooby1973, taffinessex, The Cobra, TrueBlue99, Wade Wilson86, WestCoastBlue, zapo and 487 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.