llan bluebird wrote:we were on the right track before the injuries. Its up to MM and the transfer team to move out the dead wood and bring in decent replacements. I believe they will and I am positive.
llan bluebird wrote:I always thought of MM as a defensive, pragmatic motivator and was surprised how we played when he turned up.
The 3 at the back with championship stalwart Flint with possibly one of the best championship CD's in Morrison and the mobility of Nelson allowed the wingbacks to be midfielders. so effectively we played 3421 and in most matches were on the front foot.
The injuries to Bennett,Bagan and NG killed the momentum, then you add Morrisons end of season
Flint,Brown and Nelson is not a back 3 to build on, i can't imagine another trio so poor at basic passing.The experiment to play Pack there was a good move but he is so slooooow it's a non starter.
NG is never a full on wingback in the modern sense he is a full back with enough technical ability to play like a right midfielder, so it worked. Playing Brown on the left wingback is a crime against football. The lad is a centre half and i don't know if that is at championship level.
I know its en vogue to have a go at the midfield, yes they are samey, but if the two starting CM's are Ralls and Vaulks i think thats a solid foundation. The spark is meant to come from the 2 AM's
Without this going into an essay, we were on the right track before the injuries. Its up to MM and the transfer team to move out the dead wood and bring in decent replacements. I believe they will and I am positive.
llan bluebird wrote:I always thought of MM as a defensive, pragmatic motivator and was surprised how we played when he turned up.
The 3 at the back with championship stalwart Flint with possibly one of the best championship CD's in Morrison and the mobility of Nelson allowed the wingbacks to be midfielders. so effectively we played 3421 and in most matches were on the front foot.
The injuries to Bennett,Bagan and NG killed the momentum, then you add Morrisons end of season
Flint,Brown and Nelson is not a back 3 to build on, i can't imagine another trio so poor at basic passing.The experiment to play Pack there was a good move but he is so slooooow it's a non starter.
NG is never a full on wingback in the modern sense he is a full back with enough technical ability to play like a right midfielder, so it worked. Playing Brown on the left wingback is a crime against football. The lad is a centre half and i don't know if that is at championship level.
I know its en vogue to have a go at the midfield, yes they are samey, but if the two starting CM's are Ralls and Vaulks i think thats a solid foundation. The spark is meant to come from the 2 AM's
Without this going into an essay, we were on the right track before the injuries. Its up to MM and the transfer team to move out the dead wood and bring in decent replacements. I believe they will and I am positive.
maccydee wrote:Does anyone care about the football as long as we are winning.
Malky was dogshit football.
Warnock for a lot of it was dogshit football although we had the occasional spurt of good stuff.
Dave Jones had us playing lovely football. Didn’t get us up.
maccydee wrote:Does anyone care about the football as long as we are winning.
Malky was dogshit football.
Warnock for a lot of it was dogshit football although we had the occasional spurt of good stuff.
Dave Jones had us playing lovely football. Didn’t get us up.
maccydee wrote:Does anyone care about the football as long as we are winning.
Malky was dogshit football.
Warnock for a lot of it was dogshit football although we had the occasional spurt of good stuff.
Dave Jones had us playing lovely football. Didn’t get us up.
skidemin wrote:maccydee wrote:Does anyone care about the football as long as we are winning.
Malky was dogshit football.
Warnock for a lot of it was dogshit football although we had the occasional spurt of good stuff.
Dave Jones had us playing lovely football. Didn’t get us up.
hmmm.. moaners will moan....
maccydee wrote:skidemin wrote:maccydee wrote:Does anyone care about the football as long as we are winning.
Malky was dogshit football.
Warnock for a lot of it was dogshit football although we had the occasional spurt of good stuff.
Dave Jones had us playing lovely football. Didn’t get us up.
hmmm.. moaners will moan....
Ficklies will be ficklie
llan bluebird wrote:I always thought of MM as a defensive, pragmatic motivator and was surprised how we played when he turned up.
The 3 at the back with championship stalwart Flint with possibly one of the best championship CD's in Morrison and the mobility of Nelson allowed the wingbacks to be midfielders. so effectively we played 3421 and in most matches were on the front foot.
The injuries to Bennett,Bagan and NG killed the momentum, then you add Morrisons end of season
Flint,Brown and Nelson is not a back 3 to build on, i can't imagine another trio so poor at basic passing.The experiment to play Pack there was a good move but he is so slooooow it's a non starter.
NG is never a full on wingback in the modern sense he is a full back with enough technical ability to play like a right midfielder, so it worked. Playing Brown on the left wingback is a crime against football. The lad is a centre half and i don't know if that is at championship level.
I know its en vogue to have a go at the midfield, yes they are samey, but if the two starting CM's are Ralls and Vaulks i think thats a solid foundation. The spark is meant to come from the 2 AM's
Without this going into an essay, we were on the right track before the injuries. Its up to MM and the transfer team to move out the dead wood and bring in decent replacements. I believe they will and I am positive.
Users browsing this forum: Bambasbestbuddy22, Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Igovernor, Proximic [Bot], tangledupinblue, Winchmore Hill Bluebird and 182 guests