Bakedalasker wrote:Tricky times ahead.
Ralls is perhaps one of our best players but to be offered that to means his services is not appreciated. As if we did not know already but the club is going in a 180 degree direction.
NIBluebird wrote:Depends on what he was on in the first place
He has picked up injuries recently too
Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
nubbsy wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
Ralls must have been on 56k pw
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
I was never told that ever, you said it.
I thought he had been offered half of his £24,000 a week, but that was what thought, this is reliable.
Its def quarter.
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
I was never told that ever, you said it.
I thought he had been offered half of his £24,000 a week, but that was what thought, this is reliable.
Its def quarter.
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
I was never told that ever, you said it.
I thought he had been offered half of his £24,000 a week, but that was what thought, this is reliable.
Its def quarter.
Wayne S wrote:If we are offering £6k to players the "quality" of Ralls at prime age and even with injuries......
Then we are in trouble money wise. I hope a quarter his salary is wide of the mark.
cs_original wrote:If Morison is going to play the 3 centre halfs system, then I would like us to keep him and play him in the back 3
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I was told Ralls got offered less than quarter of his wages, this came from a very reliable person, that’s why he has not agreed so far.
You were told before its 14k aweek so which one is right ?
I was never told that ever, you said it.
I thought he had been offered half of his £24,000 a week, but that was what thought, this is reliable.
Its def quarter.
I am shocked at you Wez, you seriously don’t take the kid who runs this seriously, 90% of his stuff he either copies or make up
Wayne S wrote:If we are offering £6k to players the "quality" of Ralls at prime age and even with injuries......
Then we are in trouble money wise. I hope a quarter his salary is wide of the mark.
Sneggyblubird wrote:Well if Ralls was on 24k p/w and was only offered 6 I'd take that as an indication to f**k off. However who else in this division is gonna offer him the kind of money he's used to. Something about all this doesn't seem right.
Sneggyblubird wrote:Well if Ralls was on 24k p/w and was only offered 6 I'd take that as an indication to f**k off. However who else in this division is gonna offer him the kind of money he's used to. Something about all this doesn't seem right.
paulh_85 wrote:There's no way we'd have the gall to offer ralls 6k a week
wez1927 wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Well if Ralls was on 24k p/w and was only offered 6 I'd take that as an indication to f**k off. However who else in this division is gonna offer him the kind of money he's used to. Something about all this doesn't seem right.
Probably whats not right is the wages being branded around .
ElyBoy1984 wrote:cs_original wrote:If Morison is going to play the 3 centre halfs system, then I would like us to keep him and play him in the back 3
Seems a bit random. Has Ralls ever played in defense before?
cs_original wrote:ElyBoy1984 wrote:cs_original wrote:If Morison is going to play the 3 centre halfs system, then I would like us to keep him and play him in the back 3
Seems a bit random. Has Ralls ever played in defense before?
Yeah mate, left back a few times for us. With two decent centre backs either side, I’d love to see him playing the ball from the back into mid field and coming onto the ball with plenty of time and space to build attacks from the back.
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:cs_original wrote:ElyBoy1984 wrote:cs_original wrote:If Morison is going to play the 3 centre halfs system, then I would like us to keep him and play him in the back 3
Seems a bit random. Has Ralls ever played in defense before?
Yeah mate, left back a few times for us. With two decent centre backs either side, I’d love to see him playing the ball from the back into mid field and coming onto the ball with plenty of time and space to build attacks from the back.
He’d be murdered in the middle of a back 3 mate.
Users browsing this forum: BluebirdNorth, Cardiff_CPT, Clickagy [Bot], cmorris1927, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Iceblue, Proximic [Bot], Verity [Bot], worcester_ccfc and 186 guests