fred keenor wrote:Smacks of scraping the barrell
Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
I did not. The handful of times I have seen him he usually makes the right runs and gets himself into dangerous positions. We know he’s not the answer but Nakki Wells isn’t either in my opinion.
wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
I did not. The handful of times I have seen him he usually makes the right runs and gets himself into dangerous positions. We know he’s not the answer but Nakki Wells isn’t either in my opinion.
Wells is twice the player watters or Harris are ,
Barclay1 wrote:I'm better than Harris.....
wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
I did not. The handful of times I have seen him he usually makes the right runs and gets himself into dangerous positions. We know he’s not the answer but Nakki Wells isn’t either in my opinion.
Wells is twice the player watters or Harris are ,
piledriver64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
I did not. The handful of times I have seen him he usually makes the right runs and gets himself into dangerous positions. We know he’s not the answer but Nakki Wells isn’t either in my opinion.
Wells is twice the player watters or Harris are ,
Agreed. I wanted Watters to do OK but, frankly, that performance on Saturday was ineptitude of the highest order.
No work rate, no runs and not a single shot never mind one on target. We had wide players getting decent balls into the box and he was nowhere near them, his positioning in the box was not that of a natural striker that people keep claiming he is.
Time to cut our losses and sell/loan him out. If Wells isn't better than Watters I'd be amazed !!!
One thing I would say, Morison's recruitment has been virtually faultless up to now and he hasn't signed anyone that he hasn't been convinced about. If he thinks Wells can do a job for us then I'm right behind him
Bluebina wrote:He's better than the current two but we need a lot better than that now, go for a young Premier League loan!
Igovernor wrote:Bluebina wrote:He's better than the current two but we need a lot better than that now, go for a young Premier League loan!
We are, plus one exprienced striker!
paulh_85 wrote:piledriver64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
I did not. The handful of times I have seen him he usually makes the right runs and gets himself into dangerous positions. We know he’s not the answer but Nakki Wells isn’t either in my opinion.
Wells is twice the player watters or Harris are ,
Agreed. I wanted Watters to do OK but, frankly, that performance on Saturday was ineptitude of the highest order.
No work rate, no runs and not a single shot never mind one on target. We had wide players getting decent balls into the box and he was nowhere near them, his positioning in the box was not that of a natural striker that people keep claiming he is.
Time to cut our losses and sell/loan him out. If Wells isn't better than Watters I'd be amazed !!!
One thing I would say, Morison's recruitment has been virtually faultless up to now and he hasn't signed anyone that he hasn't been convinced about. If he thinks Wells can do a job for us then I'm right behind him
Seems like a significant over reaction from one game against a top side where we were creating very little.
O dowda got a few crosses in the box first half, but Watters was isolated and it wouldn't have been easy for anyone up front Saturday.
He didn't play well of course, and Harris had better energy when he came on. But as expected, some fans are ready to write people off after one match
Igovernor wrote:Bluebina wrote:He's better than the current two but we need a lot better than that now, go for a young Premier League loan!
We are, plus one exprienced striker!
Igovernor wrote:Bluebina wrote:He's better than the current two but we need a lot better than that now, go for a young Premier League loan!
We are, plus one exprienced striker!
wez1927 wrote:Igovernor wrote:Bluebina wrote:He's better than the current two but we need a lot better than that now, go for a young Premier League loan!
We are, plus one exprienced striker!
I'm a bit concerned now ,you've been saying that for a while now .
piledriver64 wrote:paulh_85 wrote:piledriver64 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:OwainGlyndŵr123 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Pantmawr Bluebird wrote:I think Wells is a more than capable striker to be honest and a far better choice than 'gambling' on signing Carroll
If true this wouldn't be a bad signing
Much better than we got .
Better than Harris. Probably on par with Watters now.
Did you see watters play on Saturday sadly he's out of his depth in the championship.
I did not. The handful of times I have seen him he usually makes the right runs and gets himself into dangerous positions. We know he’s not the answer but Nakki Wells isn’t either in my opinion.
Wells is twice the player watters or Harris are ,
Agreed. I wanted Watters to do OK but, frankly, that performance on Saturday was ineptitude of the highest order.
No work rate, no runs and not a single shot never mind one on target. We had wide players getting decent balls into the box and he was nowhere near them, his positioning in the box was not that of a natural striker that people keep claiming he is.
Time to cut our losses and sell/loan him out. If Wells isn't better than Watters I'd be amazed !!!
One thing I would say, Morison's recruitment has been virtually faultless up to now and he hasn't signed anyone that he hasn't been convinced about. If he thinks Wells can do a job for us then I'm right behind him
Seems like a significant over reaction from one game against a top side where we were creating very little.
O dowda got a few crosses in the box first half, but Watters was isolated and it wouldn't have been easy for anyone up front Saturday.
He didn't play well of course, and Harris had better energy when he came on. But as expected, some fans are ready to write people off after one match
One game ?? We signed him 2 seasons ago and I still haven't seen anything to tell me that he will make it as a goalscorer at this level
As for Saturday, O'Dowda and Collins frequently got the ball in the box, particularly in the 1st half but also a few in the second too and Watters was nowhere near getting on the end of them.
He even had the cheek to have a go Collins after one perfect near post ball in that he didn't anticipate !! A natural striker would have made that run across the near post and got something on it.
As I said, I think it's time to cut our losses on him.
Users browsing this forum: 7777 glt, Bytespider [Bot], Clickagy [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Igovernor, jason perrys legs, Magpie [Bot], MOZZER1, northside of risca, pembroke allan, Proximic [Bot], worcester_ccfc and 217 guests