OFFICIAL: ‘ CARDIFF CITY’S 15TH SIGNING ‘

BREAKING: Cardiff City sign Jack Simpson on a permanent deal from Rangers.

Defender, 25, signs a two-year contract.


Played 9 times for Rangers last season 2021-22

Played 20 times for Bournemouth in 6 years 2015-21

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Jack Simpson 2 year deal





Played 9 times for Rangers last season 2021-22

Played 20 times for Bournemouth in 6 years 2015-21

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Welcome Jack

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Get rid of Nelson. Not good enough for this level and is the opposite of a ball playing centre half.

Ball playing centre back to replace Nelson

Im reckoning Nelson is on his way

A bit worrying reading the Rangers fans reaction on Twitter, they can't believe they managed to get a fee for him.

isnt he the one at Bournemouth we were after that went to Rangers

BREAKING: Cardiff City sign Jack Simpson on a permanent deal from Rangers.

Defender, 25, signs a two-year contract.

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

OR

Reverting back to 3 CH?

Can see him being first choice with Kipre. Good signing.

Seems like Denham may be going out on loan now.

Very good signing

Very good signing

Based on what mate, he contributed very little in Scotland.

Gerrard supposedly chased him for 3 Transfer windows, so he obviously rated him but in the games he played he was pretty much anonymous.

If he can play out from the back he'll start. Hopefully another good under the radar signing by the Gaffer.

Bit nervous going off the Rangers forum, 99% are happy to see him go, although they admit he didnt cause trouble, that it just didnt work out for him

Bit nervous going off the Rangers forum, 99% are happy to see him go, although they admit he didnt cause trouble, that it just didnt work out for him

Sorry mate but your exaggerating quite a bit.Although there were some glad to see the back of him many others wished him well.I don't put much store in those idiots on their forum and 1 or 2 on that thread said much the same.Give him a chance.

I did post this 2 days ago.
Re: Ince Red Card - bullocks : It was neve

Postby Igovernor » Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:06 am

Forever Blue wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:
Had commentary from reading tv and was ott in the extreme as was still whinging about it upto final whistle.... but as people say was not in scoring position unless he's a contortionist......
If anything you can easily say wouldn't have scored even without Nelson's intervention.
100% not a red card as to penalty without a doubt.



Annis, big difference at the back without NG, I am sorry but Nelson is not up to it. It was not just the penalty but he has no idea how to play out from the back.
I have been told that SM is going to bring in another centre half.
It does seem that SM only rates the two centre halves who started against Norwich

McGuinness not even making tonight's team.He must be on his way

Didn't he come from Bournemouth for 750k and he was onloan at rangers ?

McGuinness not even making tonight's team.He must be on his way

Not good enough imo nor Nelson.
Denham looked poor tonight too but not sure how much of that was down to CN.

Welcome

Welcome Jack ,

bloody hell never thought I would be typing that !!!

isnt he the one at Bournemouth we were after that went to Rangers

Yes, Neil Harris was after him at one point

I did post this 2 days ago.
Re: Ince Red Card - bullocks : It was neve

Postby Igovernor » Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:06 am

Forever Blue wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:
Had commentary from reading tv and was ott in the extreme as was still whinging about it upto final whistle.... but as people say was not in scoring position unless he's a contortionist......
If anything you can easily say wouldn't have scored even without Nelson's intervention.
100% not a red card as to penalty without a doubt.




Annis, big difference at the back without NG, I am sorry but Nelson is not up to it. It was not just the penalty but he has no idea how to play out from the back.
I have been told that SM is going to bring in another centre half.
It does seem that SM only rates the two centre halves who started against Norwich

Nice one right again

Please say there is a better Striker coming in than Etete and the others?

I did post this 2 days ago.
Re: Ince Red Card - bullocks : It was neve

Postby Igovernor » Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:06 am

Forever Blue wrote:

pembroke allan wrote:
Had commentary from reading tv and was ott in the extreme as was still whinging about it upto final whistle.... but as people say was not in scoring position unless he's a contortionist......
If anything you can easily say wouldn't have scored even without Nelson's intervention.
100% not a red card as to penalty without a doubt.


But unfair to criticise Etete after less than 60 mins

Annis, big difference at the back without NG, I am sorry but Nelson is not up to it. It was not just the penalty but he has no idea how to play out from the back.
I have been told that SM is going to bring in another centre half.
It does seem that SM only rates the two centre halves who started against Norwich

Nice one right again

Please say there is a better Striker coming in than Etete and the others?

all my loyal rangers fans say hes useless oh well another miss fit to go with the rest taxi for morrison and his clowns

all my loyal rangers fans say hes useless oh well another miss fit to go with the rest taxi for morrison and his clowns

Not like you to be negative chin up misery gutts . We will smash Birmingham

Happy enough with this signing.

Signed for the starting XI I would hope, as Nelson is appalling, and whilst Ng has some qualities I like, he's not really a CB.

Happy enough with this signing.

Signed for the starting XI I would hope, as Nelson is appalling, and whilst Ng has some qualities I like, he's not really a CB.

Yes certainly fits the ball playing CH role. NG is good and can fill in when needed at CH when needed but as I’ve said in previous posts, his lack of height could make him a target for opposing sides.