Forever Blue wrote:Replies FB:
This maybe a poorer batch of youngsters than perhaps we are used to but what Purse does about it is critical?
Option A is to stick with them and hope that in the future they come good.
Option B is to continually offload your weakest player and replace him with someone better (Like Football Manager

)
Going by past experiences option A doesn't work and we end up offloading to a Welsh League side and (at a later date) having to spend millions on a player because he hasn't come through the youth setup.
Some years ago, through work on a legal case, I had the good fortune to speak with Dave Merrington (Google him). He was the Youth Coach (16 upwards) at Southampton from 1983. The now incarcerated Bob Higgins looked after those younger than 16!
Anyway, when I was speaking to him we got talking about Bale and Jimmy Andrews and we talked about coaching. He used the motto "the team is only as good as the weakest link" and, to improve, you have to continually replace the weakest link with someone better.
This was the Youth Team they had in 1986 so he clearly knew what he was doing!
https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/11917935.francis-benali-remembers-southamptons-198687-youth-team/I represented some of these players in their civil action against the convicted child abuser Bob Higgins. Cant say which though!
So I honestly believe that Option B is the best. We need a good youth scouting team that is constantly on the lookout for good quality youngsters (Like when we got hold of Cameron Jerome as a youngster) and that we need to be constantly offloading the weak players and replacing them with quality.
Look at that Southampton side. Almost all of them played professionally and many of them top flight.
Is there any reason why we cannot adopt the same coaching regime that Dave Merrington adopted in the mid 80s and have a successful youth setup - and thus saving millions on transfer fees in the future?