Tan’s He’s now leveraged himself into a position where his a

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

And the only time bully Sven comes on here is to belittle and slag other posters off.
That’s your only contribution on here, are you sure you are a City fan?
You should be removed as a mod, no wonder so many say that you have bullied them off here.

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

And the only time bully Sven comes on here is to belittle and slag other posters off.
That’s your only contribution on here, are you sure you are a City fan?
You should be removed as a mod, no wonder so many say that you have bullied them off here.

Mate, I nearly stopped posting on here as Sven daily bullied me. I asked to meet him in the Ninian as he said I never existed he never turned up, surprise surprise. Your right his only contribution is to slag fans off on here.

Agree and his glib remarks shouldn't be a mod

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

No need for that, I don’t know what your problem is sometimes. You post some really good stuff but then let yourself down with this childish, sarcastic nonsense.

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

And the only time bully Sven comes on here is to belittle and slag other posters off.
That’s your only contribution on here, are you sure you are a City fan?
You should be removed as a mod, no wonder so many say that you have bullied them off here.

Bully? I'm genuinely surprised you feel you are being (quote) "bullied". I thought you had more about you than that

As for the crux of my post, please explain to me where your comments have not been done to death over the last few weeks on several threads?

It's nothing new!

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

No need for that, I don’t know what your problem is sometimes. You post some really good stuff but then let yourself down with this childish, sarcastic nonsense.

Mate, I hardly post because of Sven he mocks other fellow posters posts, yet we contribute and he does nothing but mock, maybe a time now for a new mod?

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

And the only time bully Sven comes on here is to belittle and slag other posters off.
That’s your only contribution on here, are you sure you are a City fan?
You should be removed as a mod, no wonder so many say that you have bullied them off here.

Mate, I nearly stopped posting on here as Sven daily bullied me. I asked to meet him in the Ninian as he said I never existed he never turned up, surprise surprise. Your right his only contribution is to slag fans off on here.

So it starts and the bandwagon starts rolling...

I don't come on here to (quote) "slag" people off. I think I'm a lot more respectful than that and rarely use personal remarks or profanity towards people I often don't know in person; but hey, you twist it as you feel necessary. As for "I nearly stopped posting", I find that a little dramatic but I see how that might fit your narrative on this post

It's the second time you have mentioned a meeting and I (quote) "didn't turn up". If you speak to our mutual friend, I think you'll find I'm quite happy for the introduction and the same person will tell you I didn't attend the last few games for family reasons that I don't have to share with you

Equally, I'll politely ask when was the last time you feel I was disrespectful to you? From my own recollection, the last time our paths crossed, I gave you the courtesy of a full and public apology for overstepping the mark on a specific post. We both know that to be a fact and I have done that for others when deemed necessary

As for the (quote) "shouldn't be a Moderator" jibe, I will simply remind you and others that my moderating and personal views are not to be confused. With small exception, there are plenty on here who will attest to the way I deal empathetically with things that occur and with respect, you (and certain others) need to separate the two

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

No need for that, I don’t know what your problem is sometimes. You post some really good stuff but then let yourself down with this childish, sarcastic nonsense.

Mate, I hardly post because of Sven he mocks other fellow posters posts, yet we contribute and he does nothing but mock, maybe a time now for a new mod?

Show me where I have 'moderated' you and/or where my personal views clash with said moderating?

You could always debate back, of course

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

No need for that, I don’t know what your problem is sometimes. You post some really good stuff but then let yourself down with this childish, sarcastic nonsense.

Simon, nothing but respect for you as a poster, even if we don't always agree. I certainly have a dry witt and I usually apologise where this is taken out of context. My point re the OP being old news stands

I'm just commenting so that I can find this thread easily again so I can follow the argument.

I'm just commenting so that I can find this thread easily again so I can follow the argument.

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

No need for that, I don’t know what your problem is sometimes. You post some really good stuff but then let yourself down with this childish, sarcastic nonsense.

Simon, nothing but respect for you as a poster, even if we don't always agree. I certainly have a dry witt and I usually apologise where this is taken out of context. My point re the OP being old news stands

That kind of humour doesn’t translate well in writing, I’ve fallen foul to that a few times.

Tan’s now leveraged himself into a position where his asset is unsaleable as is, yet he doesn’t want to invest too much more making it a vicious circle.

An unmitigated mess for all involved I’d say.


My thoughts are that after 14 years of being owned by Vincent Tan, I’m not sure we’re that much better off.

Granted, we don’t have the HMRC putting us in embargoes every three weeks but we’re also hugely reliant on one man’s whimsy with other Directors making interest on loans.

Did you think all that up on your own...?

I'm more than a little surprised no one else has thought of or mentioned any of that before now...!

No need for that, I don’t know what your problem is sometimes. You post some really good stuff but then let yourself down with this childish, sarcastic nonsense.

Simon, nothing but respect for you as a poster, even if we don't always agree. I certainly have a dry witt and I usually apologise where this is taken out of context. My point re the OP being old news stands

That kind of humour doesn’t translate well in writing, I’ve fallen foul to that a few times.

Simon, sadly you are right