BREAKING: MAN CITY TO SUE PREMIER LEAGUE

Man City taking legal action against Premier League
The Times

The Times reports Manchester City are to take legal action over the Premier League's rules regarding valuations of sponsorships; under regulations introduced in 2021 all deals with companies associated with clubs' owners must be independently assessed to be of 'fair market value'

Manchester City are taking legal action against the Premier League, The Times has exclusively revealed.

The newspaper reports City are attempting to end the Premier League's Associated Party Transaction (ATP) rules.

Those rules regard commercial and sponsorship deals with companies owned or associated with the same club's owners.

As things stand, those rules dictate such transactions have to be independently assessed to be of fair market value.

The Times reports that City believe the rules are "unlawful" and they want to seek damages for revenue lost by preventions made by those rules.

What are the Associated Party Transaction rules?
The Premier League’s rules require any club, its players, manager or any ‘senior official’ to run dealings with ‘associated parties’ past them.

‘Associated parties’ are companies or people who have a significant interest in the relevant club, financially or otherwise.

The Premier League’s board then reviews each transaction, to assess whether it believes they represent a fair market value.

The league says the rule helps to build “fairness” across the division, by ending a “reliance on enhanced commercial revenues linked to the club’s ownership”.

The newspaper's reporter, Matt Lawton, quotes a 165-page legal document in which City argue they are the victims of "discrimination".

The rule was brought in in December 2021 as Newcastle was bought by the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund.

The legal dispute will be settled during a two-week arbitration hearing beginning on Monday June 10.

Sky Sports News has contacted the Premier League and Manchester City for comment.


How is this related to City's 115 charges from the Premier League?

Manchester City were first charged in February 2023 with breaking financial fair play rules around 100 times over a nine-year period, which starts in 2009 and goes on until 2018.

Allegedly, they did not fully disclose the financial remunerations that were made to one of their managers over a four-year period. The suggestion is that there was a secret contract so one of the managers was getting paid much more than officially stated.

The Premier League also allege Man City didn't comply with UEFA's financial fair play rules over a five-year period. They also allege that Man City have not fully co-operated with the Premier League's investigation.

The Times report claims the hearing into City's alleged 115 breaches will be heard in November.


Sky's Kaveh Solhekol:

“The charges and this case are two separate things.

“The 115 charges have been brought by the Premier League against Man City for allegations that they have broken the league’s financial rules over 12 or 13 years.

“The hearing into those charges is set for November but obviously, a lot of those charges are also to do with sponsorship deals, deals that were done with companies that are connected to the owners of Manchester City.

“So, if Man City win this case, which starts next week, that would blow a big hole in the Premier League’s case at the hearing in November about the 115 charges because Man City would have argued successfully next week that some of these rules are unlawful and incompatible with UK competition law.”

'This could have big ramifications for future competitive balance of Premier League.

"What is being reported is unprecedented. We've got a situation where a Premier League club, Manchester City, the champions of the Premier League, are basically suing the Premier League.

"What City are going to argue at this arbitration hearing, which will start on Monday, is that some of the league's financial rules are unlawful and they are incompatible with UK competition law. The rules they are talking about are the Associated Party Transaction rules.

"These were brought in in 2021 and they are designed to make sure that if a club signs a commercial deal with a company that is linked to its owners that it has to be a fair value, and that is checked to make sure that it is of fair value.

"So, if you are the owner of a Premier League club and you have another company, say an airline or an energy company, and you want to get that company to sponsor your club - because that is a good way of bringing revenue into your club - that deal has to be checked by independent auditors to make sure it is of fair value.

"You cannot just make up a number and say the deal is worth £100m, £200m or £300m as a way of bringing money into your club. It has to be of fair value.

"But City are going to argue that these rules are unlawful and obviously, this could have big, serious ramifications for the future competitive balance of the Premier League."

If successful, this would have unseen ramifications for Premier League football and furtjer dilute the already limited field of clubs who can truly compete

I believe it will also have a 'knock on' effect on tbe EFL and its already under pressure clubs

Manchester City only care about one thing - themselves.

Thankfully, a judge will throw this out within ten seconds of it being put to them.

Manchester City only care about one thing - themselves.

Thankfully, a judge will throw this out within ten seconds of it being put to them.

This rule was brought in because they tried to manipulate the cost of sponsorship they had mega millions for sponsorship of shirts plus their owners have a family a million strong they were using them to sponsor different aspects of club all above what would be classed as fair commercial value... uefa saw this and band clubs from doing it.

Cheeky fxckers ! I hope the PL kick them out of all the professional leagues.

Amazing what money can buy you! A good legal team.

FFP is a load of bollox there to protect the legacy big clubs.

The Agnelli family, The Spanish government, the Catalonia government and so many US hedgefund are concerned they'll lose a slice of the pie with new entrants with even more cash.

Shame the Super League never broke away as I think they'd be in for a shock and lose billions. It would be a Kerry Packer circus disaster, but perhaps they need it. But all Eufa are worried about is losing a slice of the pie, so they'll have one soon.

Who is to say what "fair value is". Value is only what someone is willing to pay, and these boys are willing to pay.