Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:24 pm
Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:33 pm
Barclay1 wrote:CCFC 0 v 1 Kidderminster
Those who say it's a pre season friendly, you have a point
Thise who say it's for fitness, you have a point
Those who say it's our first run out, you have a point
Those who say we shouldn't lose our heads over such an unimportant fixture, you have a point.
Now, I'm not losing my head, but I'm disappointed to say the least that;
1. 22 players used not one showed any glimpse of basic skill to undo a Level 6 Non League team
2. Our striking options without strengthening significantly are awful. 4 clear cut first half chances that an average striker would have buried
3. If it was about fitness Kiddy finished stronger
4. We lost a game where the opposition did nothing
5. Kiddy showed how easy it was to play against us
6. Our back and fore between the back 5 continues.
7. Our kids, who should have been busting a gut, showed they cam be outplayed by a bunch of non leaguers.
Now, if thigs change with signings, great, but IMHO games like this where result and effort is not mandatory, should be played behind closed doors.
As soon as you have a paying public, players are accountable for a performance.
Could you have seen the Jack's get anything other than a thumping win, first friendly or not, fitness match or not? No, didn't think so.
So, let's wipe this game away, and begin the change. Personnel, style and effort.
Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:44 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Barclay1 wrote:CCFC 0 v 1 Kidderminster
Those who say it's a pre season friendly, you have a point
Thise who say it's for fitness, you have a point
Those who say it's our first run out, you have a point
Those who say we shouldn't lose our heads over such an unimportant fixture, you have a point.
Now, I'm not losing my head, but I'm disappointed to say the least that;
1. 22 players used not one showed any glimpse of basic skill to undo a Level 6 Non League team
2. Our striking options without strengthening significantly are awful. 4 clear cut first half chances that an average striker would have buried
3. If it was about fitness Kiddy finished stronger
4. We lost a game where the opposition did nothing
5. Kiddy showed how easy it was to play against us
6. Our back and fore between the back 5 continues.
7. Our kids, who should have been busting a gut, showed they cam be outplayed by a bunch of non leaguers.
Now, if thigs change with signings, great, but IMHO games like this where result and effort is not mandatory, should be played behind closed doors.
As soon as you have a paying public, players are accountable for a performance.
Could you have seen the Jack's get anything other than a thumping win, first friendly or not, fitness match or not? No, didn't think so.
So, let's wipe this game away, and begin the change. Personnel, style and effort.
A rarety I totally agree with your assessment!
Maybe he's making sure who's got it
or not? Problem is Maybe 2 or 3 of last nights team will be in squad for 1st team come start season..... whilst not a waste of time these friendlies they really don't tell us anything we already know squad is poor in depth
Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:45 pm
Thu Jul 11, 2024 2:51 pm
Barclay1 wrote:CCFC 0 v 1 Kidderminster
Those who say it's a pre season friendly, you have a point
Thise who say it's for fitness, you have a point
Those who say it's our first run out, you have a point
Those who say we shouldn't lose our heads over such an unimportant fixture, you have a point.
Now, I'm not losing my head, but I'm disappointed to say the least that;
1. 22 players used not one showed any glimpse of basic skill to undo a Level 6 Non League team
2. Our striking options without strengthening significantly are awful. 4 clear cut first half chances that an average striker would have buried
3. If it was about fitness Kiddy finished stronger
4. We lost a game where the opposition did nothing
5. Kiddy showed how easy it was to play against us
6. Our back and fore between the back 5 continues.
7. Our kids, who should have been busting a gut, showed they cam be outplayed by a bunch of non leaguers.
Now, if thigs change with signings, great, but IMHO games like this where result and effort is not mandatory, should be played behind closed doors.
As soon as you have a paying public, players are accountable for a performance.
Could you have seen the Jack's get anything other than a thumping win, first friendly or not, fitness match or not? No, didn't think so.
So, let's wipe this game away, and begin the change. Personnel, style and effort.
Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:17 pm
Thu Jul 11, 2024 3:53 pm
Barclay1 wrote:CCFC 0 v 1 Kidderminster
Those who say it's a pre season friendly, you have a point
Thise who say it's for fitness, you have a point
Those who say it's our first run out, you have a
Those who say we shouldn't lose our heads over such an unimportant fixture, you have a point.
Now, I'm not losing my head, but I'm disappointed to say the least that;
1. 22 players used not one showed any glimpse of basic skill to undo a Level 6 Non League team
2. Our striking options without strengthening significantly are awful. 4 clear cut first half chances that an average striker would have buried
3. If it was about fitness Kiddy finished stronger
4. We lost a game where the opposition did nothing
5. Kiddy showed how easy it was to play against us
6. Our back and fore between the back 5 continues.
7. Our kids, who should have been busting a gut, showed they cam be outplayed by a bunch of non leaguers.
Now, if thigs change with signings, great, but IMHO games like this where result and effort is not mandatory, should be played behind closed doors.
As soon as you have a paying public, players are accountable for a performance.
Could you have seen the Jack's get anything other than a thumping win, first friendly or not, fitness match or not? No, didn't think so.
So, let's wipe this game away, and begin the change. Personnel, style and effort.
Thu Jul 11, 2024 4:36 pm
Barclay1 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Barclay1 wrote:CCFC 0 v 1 Kidderminster
Those who say it's a pre season friendly, you have a point
Thise who say it's for fitness, you have a point
Those who say it's our first run out, you have a point
Those who say we shouldn't lose our heads over such an unimportant fixture, you have a point.
Now, I'm not losing my head, but I'm disappointed to say the least that;
1. 22 players used not one showed any glimpse of basic skill to undo a Level 6 Non League team
2. Our striking options without strengthening significantly are awful. 4 clear cut first half chances that an average striker would have buried
3. If it was about fitness Kiddy finished stronger
4. We lost a game where the opposition did nothing
5. Kiddy showed how easy it was to play against us
6. Our back and fore between the back 5 continues.
7. Our kids, who should have been busting a gut, showed they cam be outplayed by a bunch of non leaguers.
Now, if thigs change with signings, great, but IMHO games like this where result and effort is not mandatory, should be played behind closed doors.
As soon as you have a paying public, players are accountable for a performance.
Could you have seen the Jack's get anything other than a thumping win, first friendly or not, fitness match or not? No, didn't think so.
So, let's wipe this game away, and begin the change. Personnel, style and effort.
A rarety I totally agree with your assessment!
Maybe he's making sure who's got it
or not? Problem is Maybe 2 or 3 of last nights team will be in squad for 1st team come start season..... whilst not a waste of time these friendlies they really don't tell us anything we already know squad is poor in depth
Why thank you sir....