Sat Aug 17, 2024 6:47 am
Sat Aug 17, 2024 7:30 am
Wiggy wrote:Two VERY impressive sides last night both going for gold. Backed by a big crowd, the sky blues really
caught the eye. Quick fast pace tempo, front foot football, tricky gifted players. They won't be far away this season.
An excellent game to watch great entertainment for Friday evening.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 7:31 am
Sat Aug 17, 2024 7:43 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Wiggy wrote:Two VERY impressive sides last night both going for gold. Backed by a big crowd, the sky blues really
caught the eye. Quick fast pace tempo, front foot football, tricky gifted players. They won't be far away this season.
An excellent game to watch great entertainment for Friday evening.
Oxford were dreadful in defence. They’ll get a few hammerings this year imo.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 7:43 am
Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 8:00 am
Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 8:01 am
Maccydear wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
Each of those players we could do with now.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 8:10 am
Sat Aug 17, 2024 8:28 am
Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 8:50 am
MikeO76 wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
It goes to show what the right manager can do. Loads of people always blaming the players for poor performances when they are only playing to how they are trained and setup, tactics etc.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 9:03 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:MikeO76 wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
It goes to show what the right manager can do. Loads of people always blaming the players for poor performances when they are only playing to how they are trained and setup, tactics etc.
Do you honestly think Brown and Vaulks are players we should have held onto mate?
Sat Aug 17, 2024 9:27 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
Each of those players we could do with now.
Ciaran Brown? Will Vaulks? I really don’t think so.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 9:51 am
Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Roath_Blue wrote:Oxford have surprised me so far.
I thought they would be whipping dogs for the rest of the division.
Especially ad they have 4 players that were surplus to requirements with us in the championship.
Each of those players we could do with now.
Ciaran Brown? Will Vaulks? I really don’t think so.
We are looking for a centre back as cover and we have Joe Ralls doing left hand circles in our team. Vaulks would be a decent back up for Siopsis.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 11:31 am
Sat Aug 17, 2024 11:41 am
Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 12:20 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 12:33 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
Sat Aug 17, 2024 12:37 pm
Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
Sat Aug 17, 2024 12:42 pm
Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:01 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:03 pm
Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:11 pm
he’s not even playing for us yet.bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
No El-Ghazi?
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:21 pm
Merthyrfunhouse wrote:he’s not even playing for us yet.bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
No El-Ghazi?
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:25 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
No El-Ghazi?
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:34 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Merthyrfunhouse wrote:he’s not even playing for us yet.bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
No El-Ghazi?
I did say ‘based on all players in current squads and with all players fit’.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:37 pm
Merthyrfunhouse wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Merthyrfunhouse wrote:he’s not even playing for us yet.bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
No El-Ghazi?
I did say ‘based on all players in current squads and with all players fit’.
I know but he hasn’t played for so we don’t know how good he is. Can’t make a selection on a name and because we think he should be good.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 1:40 pm
Merthyrfunhouse wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Merthyrfunhouse wrote:he’s not even playing for us yet.bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Maccydear wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebird For Life wrote:2 in 2 for surplus to requirements striker Mark Harris. Written off as one worked hard but couldn't hack it in the Championship and given away. Why do we keep doing this to our young players... Play them in the right position ffs - Harris was used principally as a sub or a winger.
Can’t remember anyone saying he should have been kept when we got rid of him. Let’s see how he, and his club get on by the end of the season before we judge then I reckon.
A fair point regarding this season, but he also scored the goals that got them promoted last season...
It’s weird with Harris. He has clearly bulked up and his confidence has improved a lot and he looks massively different to the player I remember playing right wing for Cardiff.
He would get in our team 100%
We’ll just have to agree to disagree
As you’ve watched a lot of both teams, what would be your combined first 11 based on all players in current squads and with all players fit ?
Cumming
Ng
Moore
Chambers/Goutas
Collins
Brannagan
Siopsis (Robertson most likely)
Ramsey
Goodrhem
Harris
Willock
No El-Ghazi?
I did say ‘based on all players in current squads and with all players fit’.
I know but he hasn’t played for so we don’t know how good he is. Can’t make a selection on a name and because we think he should be good.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 4:40 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Wiggy wrote:Two VERY impressive sides last night both going for gold. Backed by a big crowd, the sky blues really
caught the eye. Quick fast pace tempo, front foot football, tricky gifted players. They won't be far away this season.
An excellent game to watch great entertainment for Friday evening.
Oxford were dreadful in defence. They’ll get a few hammerings this year imo.
Sat Aug 17, 2024 4:54 pm
Maccydear wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Wiggy wrote:Two VERY impressive sides last night both going for gold. Backed by a big crowd, the sky blues really
caught the eye. Quick fast pace tempo, front foot football, tricky gifted players. They won't be far away this season.
An excellent game to watch great entertainment for Friday evening.
Oxford were dreadful in defence. They’ll get a few hammerings this year imo.
Wish we were as awful in defence