If Ramsey’s injury is serious

Then that is down to Bulut I’m afraid.

We have to manage his fitness and the game was gone at 3-0.

Should have been substituted much earlier.

Then that is down to Bulut I’m afraid.

We have to manage his fitness and the game was gone at 3-0.

Should have been substituted much earlier.

My little brain kept saying the same thing over & over, "why is Ramsey still on the pitch?" I was one of the people who wanted Bulut to stay because I thought we needed to put our faith in someone & stop chopping & changing but leaving Ramsey on was unforgivable.

Then that is down to Bulut I’m afraid.

We have to manage his fitness and the game was gone at 3-0.

Should have been substituted much earlier.

At 3-0 surely this was the time to get Robertson on and give him a run

Have to agree. Has Bulut got the nous to improve results? I know it's 2 matches but it's a dreadful start, considering the ambitious words in pre-season

Completely agree. I’d much rather him get 60 minutes and stay fit than play 90 and then get injured. He should’ve been off by 70th latest last week as well IMO

Totally agree. Yet another example of just how poor a manager we have

Sorry that's total rubbish. When does he play 90 minutes? We had already lost Rall! If Ramsey can't play 90 minutes anymore then it's time to get rid and let King have a run in the side.

He's a busted flush. Matter of games till O'Dowda goes, also.

Reliance on them is horrible prep.

At this rate Bulut will be gone before 10 games and we'll have an even shi##ier puppet manager with Coco the clown (Tan) and his sidekick Bozo (Dalman) pulling the strings.

PS. How many more fkn injuries are we going to have? This really is a shi##y start to the season and if we lose to the unwashed down the road this board will go into meltdown

He was injured by a rash tackle from their player who's fault is that? But yes should have come off straight after 3rd goal but insight is lovely when you've got it

Sorry that's total rubbish. When does he play 90 minutes? We had already lost Rall! If Ramsey can't play 90 minutes anymore then it's time to get rid and let King have a run in the side.

Now you're just talking rubbish. There are plenty of players who have managed their playing time & always will be, it's nothing new.

He was injured by a rash tackle from their player who's fault is that? But yes should have come off straight after 3rd goal but insight is lovely when you've got it

Nothing to do with hindsight Allan, we all knew & know his game time needs to be managed & leaving him on was just bad management once we were down by 3.

I was typing the question asking why he was still on as he got injured & if I could see it there's no excuse for Bulut not seeing it & acting on it.

Highest earner , the player who the team is based around and he is incapable of playing two games on the trot
I get the points made about taking him off, but he will be an expensive passenger again, this season

He was injured by a rash tackle from their player who's fault is that? But yes should have come off straight after 3rd goal but insight is lovely when you've got it

Nothing to do with hindsight Allan, we all knew & know his game time needs to be managed & leaving him on was just bad management once we were down by 3.

I was typing the question asking why he was still on as he got injured & if I could see it there's no excuse for Bulut not seeing it & acting on it.

Hindsight was reference to taking him off before he got injured maybe bulut plan was subbing him after 70 mins managers do have their idiosyncrasies when comes to substitute times. ? But agreed should come off at 3 nil as game was lost by then .... hopefully not that bad he is more robust this season as last week took similar hit and was ok

Highest earner , the player who the team is based around and he is incapable of playing two games on the trot
I get the points made about taking him off, but he will be an expensive passenger again, this season

He did play two games on the trot, you can't account for injuries caused by a bad tackle, that can happen to any player.

Then that is down to Bulut I’m afraid.

We have to manage his fitness and the game was gone at 3-0.

Should have been substituted much earlier.

Yeah I was thinking the same thing. Unfortunately the game was done at 3-0 so time to plan for the Swansea game.

Ramsey was always going to get injured ffs. Count him out of the squad and when he plays it's a bonus.

He needs to retire now

We shouldn't be carrying players,replace him and give somebody else a chance who isn't made of glass.

He needs managing in terms of time yes, but you're talking as if this is 25 games into the season. It's not.

He got tackled recklessly and that's what caused the injury. Not the fact he was still on the pitch in the 2nd game of the season.

Just saw the replay of Burnley's fourth goal.
Ramsey gave the ball away and decided to have a nap, instead of getting up and trying to win the ball back.
In the event, Burnley scored.
Shameful!

He needs managing in terms of time yes, but you're talking as if this is 25 games into the season. It's not.

He got tackled recklessly and that's what caused the injury. Not the fact he was still on the pitch in the 2nd game of the season.

Think people's point is after 3rd goal bulut should have substituted Rambo no need to keep on on pitch ... be ready for swans lots managers would have fone ghat yo their main man

I honestly find it unbelievable that anyone can defend Bulut keeping AR on.

Time and time again we’ve been told that we have to look after his fitness.

So let’s keep him playing when a game is already gone, what a brilliant idea.

Two league games in, he’s played 90 minutes in.

That tells me that Bulut has no intention of managing his fitness.