A forum for all things Cardiff City
Sat Jan 09, 2010 5:37 pm
He had a game today & he is way out of his depth
But a very poor performance allround
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:07 pm
A pile of cack may be a bit strong, but he doesn't look like being the answer to any of our questions.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:10 pm
Way out of his depth in my opinion
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:13 pm
Yes a pile of cack is a bit harsh, i would prefer to call him a light smattering of cack
I know he has mates on this board, but he has never proved he is good enough for this level, get rid I say a wage we can ill afford to squander at the moment.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:36 pm
How can you blame one player, Yet he gave 110%.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:38 pm
I don't think anyone is blaming one player Annis, but even though he is a mate of yours, you have to accept he is not good enough at this level.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:38 pm
Should of added, effort alone is not enough, if it was we still be playing Andy Jordan and Scott McCulloch !
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:39 pm
fair play to feeney he gave 110% there was nothing around him, he is a battler and fights for the ball like a terrier,but without support being a striker is a lonely job
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:39 pm
Forever Blue wrote:How can you blame one player, Yet he gave 110%.
I have to agree with you, Im not usually a Feeney fan but I though he did give 110%, can only improve through playing games.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:41 pm
give the lad a break for god sake,im sure he give it 100% and if that wasn't good enough then so be it.
Blackpool are the type of side to make any team look bad,they did it to us at ours,their spoilers.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:42 pm
Why cant we play from the back and play the ball into the forwards feet today was root 1 and to be fair to feeney all he was getting was long high balls which he had no chance of winning dj try and use a plan b sorry forgot you dont know any other way
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:45 pm
I blame the f*cking mid-field!!!! f*cking useless service to the strikers, both rossco and chops coming deep looking for the ball!!
Whitts fucked up everything he touched in the second half!!
I dunno
Sat Jan 09, 2010 6:48 pm
Second half all we did was pump the long ball to either Feeney or Matthews. Yet our only decent attack happened when hudson ran the ball out from defence. Any decent manager would have told our boys to run at them at pace rather then pump the high balls in, which didnt bother their defence one bit as soon as josh went off. Feeney and McCormack were the only two players who put any effort and passion into the game in the second half!
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:04 pm
I accept that Feeney put 110% effort in and he can't be blamed for being played out of position, but it's fair comment that as a target man he is a pile of cack.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:07 pm
Forever Blue wrote:How can you blame one player, Yet he gave 110%.
If that was his 110% he isn't good enough for this level.
He seems clueless when he ahsn't got the ball and even worse when he has it at his feet.
Decent "dummy" for Mccormacks chance,that was it.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:09 pm
Miguel_Comminges wrote:Forever Blue wrote:How can you blame one player, Yet he gave 110%.
If that was his 110% he isn't good enough for this level.
He seems clueless when he ahsn't got the ball and even worse when he has it at his feet.
Decent "dummy" for Mccormacks chance,that was it.
He played like a player who hasn't been playing regularly. Give him a run of matches, with decent service rather than hoofball, then judge him.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:11 pm
nerd wrote:Miguel_Comminges wrote:Forever Blue wrote:How can you blame one player, Yet he gave 110%.
If that was his 110% he isn't good enough for this level.
He seems clueless when he ahsn't got the ball and even worse when he has it at his feet.
Decent "dummy" for Mccormacks chance,that was it.
He played like a player who hasn't been playing regularly. Give him a run of matches, with decent service rather than hoofball, then judge him.
We can't afford to give a player a run of games who's goalscoring record at CLUB level is that bad.
Hoofball is how we play till Steve Mcphail/a decent CM is signed.
Ledley was absolutely dire today, Rae/Whitts couldn't pass 5-10 yards it was embarrassing.
Last edited by Miguel_Comminges on Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:11 pm
nerd wrote:Miguel_Comminges wrote:Forever Blue wrote:How can you blame one player, Yet he gave 110%.
If that was his 110% he isn't good enough for this level.
He seems clueless when he ahsn't got the ball and even worse when he has it at his feet.
Decent "dummy" for Mccormacks chance,that was it.
He played like a player who hasn't been playing regularly. Give him a run of matches, with decent service rather than hoofball, then judge him.
Give him 6 games then make comments.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:21 pm
He tried hard which is more than some of the "stars" on the pitch. That alone gives him the right to have more oportunities
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:42 pm
Personally thought Feeney showed more effort than others and worked the blackpool back line hard was very unlucky with his dissallowed goal too, moo cow to say he was cack is your opinion but be honest we went 4-5-1 with feeney up top and we were playing long high balls to him ffs give the guy a break he is what 5' 6" i bet he loves playing with supply like that.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:53 pm
IMO Feeney was one of the better players on the pitch. Tracked back,held the ball up well and more importantly gave 100% which is more than most today.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:57 pm
Mr Moo Cow wrote:He had a game today & he is way out of his depth
But a very poor performance allround
I know the personal
Insults were really directed at me as if you watch the game most of our player were cack, yet you singled out feeney lol
If Feeney was shite I WOULD BE THE FIRST TO ADMIT.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 7:59 pm
Feeney did okay. Bad challenge that could have seen a red card. Scored a good goal but ref was a nob. He gave 100%. Deserves another chance.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:04 pm
Give him 6 games then make comments.[/quote]
Annis there is more chance of me muffing the queen ( come on loz u know you want it) than Feeney getting a run of 6 games. DJ loves yes men that's why purse was forced out
Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:10 pm
i know feeney is not the answer and even with a run of games will not turn him into a good player at this level,but to say he was cack is not right,he come on sub and there was 8 shocking performances,whittingham for one was terrible,so its harsh to say feeney was cack,and as ive stated i dont agree with the feeney needs games etc. but be fair when singling him out. thats my fair observation from today
Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:15 pm
Mr Moo Cow wrote:He had a game today & he is way out of his depth
But a very poor performance allround
what a dick you are moo cow , the boy tried and nearly scored.
go back on the other mb, you must be from the trust, mike morris warrior and heathblue.
Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:19 pm
annis he was no worse than the rest of them today,we lost the plot when josh went off.it looked as if jonesy had his plan a ie pump high balls to him and that continued when he went off.mcormack and feeney aint the tallest are they?
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.