NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:49 pm
1 - 0 in under minutes
but heads up get on it
but heads up get on it
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:54 pm
My god, not looking good is it! 2-0
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:54 pm
LOL heads up i didnt mean gypes!!!
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:00 pm
Jez wrote:LOL heads up i didnt mean gypes!!!
3-0
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:02 pm
UMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
seems like a mental block somewhere - not sure of formation being used - summat needs doing AND FAST!
seems like a mental block somewhere - not sure of formation being used - summat needs doing AND FAST!
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:03 pm
Oh dear..........
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:14 pm
I am not enjoying the commentary - its all newcastle possession - come on!!!
too many long balls grrrrrrrr
too many long balls grrrrrrrr
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:14 pm
Burke's coming on 
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:16 pm
Jez wrote:Burke's coming on
Pray to the big footballing god in the sky!!!
Come on City!!
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:20 pm
Jez wrote:Burke's coming on
Whos he replaced?
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:21 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Jez wrote:Burke's coming on
Whos he replaced?
Bothroyd
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:21 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Jez wrote:Burke's coming on
Whos he replaced?
Jay.
Is he still playing 4-4-2
Re: NOT A GOOD START 1-0
Fri Feb 05, 2010 8:25 pm
Bartlett_bluebird wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Jez wrote:Burke's coming on
Whos he replaced?
Jay.
Is he still playing 4-4-2
He could be playing PING-PONG for all we know - fooking useless - half time he has to make changes cos we wont be able to hold off another 45mins!!!!!!