Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:47 pm

Excellent sound-track!

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:49 pm

hahaha just seen dai hunt

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:50 pm

Whats been said?

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:52 pm

lost 37 million i think this accountant just said, and we have paid langstons something.
cant you get bbc wales in derby mate?
sure you got cable or sky ?

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:52 pm

Same old same old, they are making accusations and the Riddler is saying don't forget what I've delivered

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:57 pm

The Premier 1 wrote:lost 37 million i think this accountant just said, and we have paid langstons something.
cant you get bbc wales in derby mate?
sure you got cable or sky ?


Not got sky or cable. Need to get a few things sorted out.

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:02 pm

SMARRRRRRRRRRRRY ROBBING FUCKER!

He is lying everything he says his eyes go left - bad body language for LIARS!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:03 pm

Jez wrote:SMARRRRRRRRRRRRY ROBBING FUCKER!

He is lying everything he says his eyes go left - bad body language for LIARS!!!!!!!!!!



:lol: :lol: :lol: i rub the top of my head .......... weird thing is my hairs gone :lol:

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:04 pm

Humphry's wrote:
Jez wrote:SMARRRRRRRRRRRRY ROBBING FUCKER!

He is lying everything he says his eyes go left - bad body language for LIARS!!!!!!!!!!



:lol: :lol: :lol: i rub the top of my head .......... weird thing is my hairs gone :lol:



HUMPH i say f@@k all - :| :| :| :|

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:13 pm

He reckons we only owe langston (Sam) 10 million???? And we have paid the first installment.


alot of question dodging and how far he has brought the club.... :evil:

What a c**t, couldnt believe my eyes some of the answers the c**t give :evil: :evil: :evil:

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:15 pm

Jez wrote:SMARRRRRRRRRRRRY ROBBING FUCKER!

He is lying everything he says his eyes go left - bad body language for LIARS!!!!!!!!!!


Studied body language during my management stint in college, your right what a shifty fucker :evil:

Also his posture wasnt that of what a person who is speaking openly.

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:17 pm

NinianSHEEP wrote:He reckons we only owe langston (Sam) 10 million???? And we have paid the first installment.


alot of question dodging and how far he has brought the club.... :evil:

What a c**t, couldnt believe my eyes some of the answers the c**t give :evil: :evil: :evil:


I think the new deal was something along those lines. Around a million a year until the 10m is paid off or something like that.
If we defaulted on the monthly payments (£87k) it would cancel the deal I think.
I'm not sure whether the £10m is all we need to pay back though

Re: Week in Week Out

Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:19 pm

Owain wrote:
NinianSHEEP wrote:He reckons we only owe langston (Sam) 10 million???? And we have paid the first installment.


alot of question dodging and how far he has brought the club.... :evil:

What a c**t, couldnt believe my eyes some of the answers the c**t give :evil: :evil: :evil:


I think the new deal was something along those lines. Around a million a year until the 10m is paid off or something like that.
If we defaulted on the monthly payments (£87k) it would cancel the deal I think.
I'm not sure whether the £10m is all we need to pay back though


He implied that tho mate, your right about the repayments :ayatollah:

Re: Week in Week Out

Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:20 am

Owain wrote:
NinianSHEEP wrote:He reckons we only owe langston (Sam) 10 million???? And we have paid the first installment.


alot of question dodging and how far he has brought the club.... :evil:

What a c**t, couldnt believe my eyes some of the answers the c**t give :evil: :evil: :evil:


I think the new deal was something along those lines. Around a million a year until the 10m is paid off or something like that.
If we defaulted on the monthly payments (£87k) it would cancel the deal I think.
I'm not sure whether the £10m is all we need to pay back though


The way he spun the Langston deal was totally typical of the man. The debt is £10m provided we pay all of that amount by 31 December this year.

If we don't settle in full (which is highly likely) the £83,333 we pay every month (or £1m P/A) reverts to interest and from 1 January next year we will be back to square one and owe £10m but will continue to pay £83,333 P/M.

This arrangement continues until 31 December 2016 when the £10m MUST be repaid in full, so if goes that far then the debt would have increased to £17m and that's without the £5m 'bonus' which is paid should we get promoted to the Premier League.

So to discribe the debt to Langston as '£10m' was at best spin at worst as misleading as the Golden Ticket Scheme.

Re: Week in Week Out

Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:33 am

My post of the 11/02 reflects some aspects , unless of course the guy who was talking lifted it from here ...-

A limited company has 9 months following their year end (CCFC y/e May 2009) to file their accounts with Companies House for the public domain.

Once the accounts are filed you can tell the auditors opinion on those accounts by whether they have been audited on a "going concern" basis e.g company will trade for the foreseeable future (12 months +) or on a "break-up" basis e.g the auditors can not 100% guarantee that the company will trade for the forseeable future.

As previously stated the issue with published accounts are that they are out of date and it is only usually the companies management accounts which provide an accurate picture to the board etc (these are not for public domain).

Re: Week in Week Out

Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:45 am

Joff wrote:My post of the 11/02 reflects some aspects , unless of course the guy who was talking lifted it from here ...-

A limited company has 9 months following their year end (CCFC y/e May 2009) to file their accounts with Companies House for the public domain.

Once the accounts are filed you can tell the auditors opinion on those accounts by whether they have been audited on a "going concern" basis e.g company will trade for the foreseeable future (12 months +) or on a "break-up" basis e.g the auditors can not 100% guarantee that the company will trade for the forseeable future.

As previously stated the issue with published accounts are that they are out of date and it is only usually the companies management accounts which provide an accurate picture to the board etc (these are not for public domain).


Can the shareholders ask for the management accounts to be produced for an EGM?

Re: Week in Week Out

Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:20 am

Then dont have to, however, they probably will in an EGM. They may just give you the last 6 months. It really does depend on company policy.