Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:26 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:28 pm
Eddie May wrote:I Quit.
just because Carl ccfc of this Forum getting some of the Brief details out of the egm first, has got tlg going in a strop
What have trust achieved NOTHING, just tlg wanting to be noticed more lol
Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:28 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:29 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:29 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:30 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:40 pm
nerd wrote:"Having just got back from the meeting, I can say a lot of things I have read on this and the other message board regarding what was said and how the information was delivered is false."
So, there you go.
Carl, Owain, even Annis I assume, clearly all were wrong according to Dave.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:41 pm
carlccfc wrote:nerd wrote:"Having just got back from the meeting, I can say a lot of things I have read on this and the other message board regarding what was said and how the information was delivered is false."
So, there you go.
Carl, Owain, even Annis I assume, clearly all were wrong according to Dave.
Where has TLG said this ?
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:42 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:43 pm
The Rhooster wrote:carlccfc wrote:nerd wrote:"Having just got back from the meeting, I can say a lot of things I have read on this and the other message board regarding what was said and how the information was delivered is false."
So, there you go.
Carl, Owain, even Annis I assume, clearly all were wrong according to Dave.
Where has TLG said this ?
on the other board.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:44 pm
CF11 wrote:We don't know what he was referring to though.
We'll have to see what he says in his report
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:45 pm
carlccfc wrote:The Rhooster wrote:carlccfc wrote:[
Where has TLG said this ?
on the other board.
Cheers Paul
does TLG expand on what information has been delivered falsely ?
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:45 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:47 pm
The Rhooster wrote:CF11 wrote:We don't know what he was referring to though.
We'll have to see what he says in his report
correct but would it have been simpler to have left it until he could post his views in full rather than make a sweeping statement that only serves to stir people up.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:51 pm
ihatealiens wrote:The Rhooster wrote:CF11 wrote:We don't know what he was referring to though.
We'll have to see what he says in his report
correct but would it have been simpler to have left it until he could post his views in full rather than make a sweeping statement that only serves to stir people up.
Sweeping statement? who TLG? he wouldn't do that would he?
Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:55 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:05 pm
headlight wrote:Yes PG has loaned/invested 10 million in the club but he is also charging a hefty 9% interest on it & he has contracts in place so that any money from certain player sales he has first claim on ! He has not done the club any favours.
headlight
Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:08 pm
carlccfc wrote:I think that this statement is what TLG is referring too and if so I wish he would have been more precise regarding false information.headlight wrote:Yes PG has loaned/invested 10 million in the club but he is also charging a hefty 9% interest on it & he has contracts in place so that any money from certain player sales he has first claim on ! He has not done the club any favours.
headlight
Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:41 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:01 pm
Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:I think that this statement is what TLG is referring too and if so I wish he would have been more precise regarding false information.headlight wrote:Yes PG has loaned/invested 10 million in the club but he is also charging a hefty 9% interest on it & he has contracts in place so that any money from certain player sales he has first claim on ! He has not done the club any favours.
headlight
Yes thats what he just said to me has annoyed him.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:08 pm
Forever Blue wrote:carlccfc wrote:I think that this statement is what TLG is referring too and if so I wish he would have been more precise regarding false information.headlight wrote:Yes PG has loaned/invested 10 million in the club but he is also charging a hefty 9% interest on it & he has contracts in place so that any money from certain player sales he has first claim on ! He has not done the club any favours.
headlight
Yes thats what he just said to me has annoyed him.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:10 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Why is he annoyed by that?
PMG do have first call on all player transfers etc its well known and documents at Companies House confirm it.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:12 pm
carlccfc wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Why is he annoyed by that?
PMG do have first call on all player transfers etc its well known and documents at Companies House confirm it.
Tony I believe that it is the 9% that has annoyed TLG.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:15 pm
CF11 wrote:carlccfc wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Why is he annoyed by that?
PMG do have first call on all player transfers etc its well known and documents at Companies House confirm it.
Tony I believe that it is the 9% that has annoyed TLG.
So his 'call' for people to stay calm was about a 9% interest charge?
I hadn't even seen this figure anywhere! There's a couple of things I've read about this evening that had not been mentioned at all during the day, so I'm looking forward to seeing a full report whenever it's ready.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:22 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:24 pm
carlccfc wrote:CF11 wrote:carlccfc wrote:
Tony I believe that it is the 9% that has annoyed TLG.
So his 'call' for people to stay calm was about a 9% interest charge?
I hadn't even seen this figure anywhere! There's a couple of things I've read about this evening that had not been mentioned at all during the day, so I'm looking forward to seeing a full report whenever it's ready.
It is only what I believe that TLG would have been upset about unless there was something that I put up on here regarding what was said at the EGM but I dont think that is the case so doing a bit of investigation work leads me to the statement by headlight.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:28 pm
The Rhooster wrote:Wasnt the statement by headlight posted after TLGS?
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:31 pm
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:33 pm
[/quote][/quote]headlight wrote:It is only what I believe that TLG would have been upset about unless there was something that I put up on here regarding what was said at the EGM but I dont think that is the case so doing a bit of investigation work leads me to the statement by headlight.
Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:35 pm