Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:58 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:00 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:10 am
nerd wrote:Red Knight seems to me to get a good idea in theory, in practise...
Those millions of fans will whine like bitches when they don't have the money for the big transfers they want to see and the team start sliding down the table.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:13 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:18 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:35 am
nerd wrote:
The problem is, which fans would head the consortium? Who would run the club? There are plenty of governance issues arising.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:40 am
Wayne S wrote:nerd wrote:
The problem is, which fans would head the consortium? Who would run the club? There are plenty of governance issues arising.
I would assume it is no different to the current situation, there are numerous shareholders and they leave the running of the club to an employed Executive Director
We just employ a relevently educated individual who knows how to make at least half an effort into running a club.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:45 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:00 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:It is certainly something that should be looked into.
£40m would be top whack so there could be room to negotiate both the share price and individual debts downwards and the price could be as low as £25-30m. If enough supporters were willing to contribute over the long term £15-20 p/m that income could be securitised and used to buy the club and pay off the debts.
All those taking part would become preferential shareholders who could eventually sell their stake and even see a return.
The scheme would result in the club living off all its own generated income without being weighed down by debt repayments of over £3m P/A.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:06 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:16 am
nerd wrote:The problem is, to get control that way, the people have to be willing to sell their shares NOW.
"Well, we can buy them off you, we can guarantee XXX a month" isn't foing to cut it - the money would have to be built up before being able to do that. By which time it could be too late.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:18 am
ianfens wrote:
It would show the General fan and indeed Public that as fans we can actually think of the future......I would certainly pay £20 pm.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:19 am
ianfens wrote:nerd wrote:The problem is, to get control that way, the people have to be willing to sell their shares NOW.
"Well, we can buy them off you, we can guarantee XXX a month" isn't foing to cut it - the money would have to be built up before being able to do that. By which time it could be too late.
Couldnt the Trust set up a fund for this .....even for a long term future project?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:22 am
nerd wrote:ianfens wrote:nerd wrote:The problem is, to get control that way, the people have to be willing to sell their shares NOW.
"Well, we can buy them off you, we can guarantee XXX a month" isn't foing to cut it - the money would have to be built up before being able to do that. By which time it could be too late.
Couldnt the Trust set up a fund for this .....even for a long term future project?
That's what Trust membership fees are meant to be for, aren't they?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:24 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:28 am
Wayne S wrote:ianfens wrote:
It would show the General fan and indeed Public that as fans we can actually think of the future......I would certainly pay £20 pm.
I just think the per month method may be too difficult to manage. Do you remember the annual fee you could pay to help fund Ebbsfleet, so many people dropped out after the first year.
Cash up front form investors would be the ideal scenario if there are about 5 to 10 people who can put in major amounts the momentum would then carry the idea forward to lesser investors and then to us little fans with our £50 to £500 quid investments.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:29 am
Wayne S wrote:Come on then let's have five individuals that £5million would not even dent their wallet and may still see it as a future investment. They may look at it different if they are not being asked to take over completely but be part of a larger group.
Some of these have been mentioned before and although they are not Football Fans or Cardiff linked, they have links to sport or Cardiff but probably not both.
Michael Moritz - likes to invest in stuff in Cardiff, but not known to be a sports individual.
Admiral Insurance Guy - Dunno his name, but Cardiff based and into his sport.
Who next?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:38 am
ianfens wrote:Wayne S wrote:Come on then let's have five individuals that £5million would not even dent their wallet and may still see it as a future investment. They may look at it different if they are not being asked to take over completely but be part of a larger group.
Some of these have been mentioned before and although they are not Football Fans or Cardiff linked, they have links to sport or Cardiff but probably not both.
Michael Moritz - likes to invest in stuff in Cardiff, but not known to be a sports individual.
Admiral Insurance Guy - Dunno his name, but Cardiff based and into his sport.
Who next?
Wasn't Julian Hodge's son a City fan? admittedly im talking of some 30+ years ago.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:04 am
Wayne S wrote:Although I think it is stupid to throw £1billion at a single club at least the Red Knight Consortium are (supposedly) fans of Manchester United and have asked for the fans backing by getting them to join the Supporters Trust for Free. Over the last few days their number went from 50k to 80k.
The idea is that there are about 50 fans each chucking in about £15million and others throwing in anythin from £5 to £1million as proper investment to get rid of the current owners and pay off the massive debt. The club will then be run by the book spending what comes in, which, be honest, will be loads.
So do we have this potential? I instantly assume not. But hypothetically what would we need?
We must be talking about £40million tops to pay off debts get rid of the major shareholders and leave enough money to replace short term income streams that have been lost and a bit more for the team.
5 Investors with £5million + 10 More with £1million + 20 more with £250k. Are we that short of millionaires in this country that this would be impossible for a European capital City.
As I said, I assume we do not have that muscle amongst our fans or even just amongst our population. But it's nice to dream.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:29 am
Uccello Azzurro wrote:Anyone looking to get the Club at closer to its real value would be wise to focus on the debt. With equity looking increasingly worthless, buying out creditors and leveraging that in negotiations with the existing shareholders would be the smarter way to go.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:45 am
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:52 am
Nottage Blue wrote:Turns out our Blue Knight is one of the Red Knights
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:58 am
Wayne S wrote:Nottage Blue wrote:Turns out our Blue Knight is one of the Red Knights
Has he stuck cash in though or is he just brokering the deal and then getting shares fro free like his mate PR?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:58 pm
nerd wrote:ianfens wrote:Wayne S wrote:Come on then let's have five individuals that £5million would not even dent their wallet and may still see it as a future investment. They may look at it different if they are not being asked to take over completely but be part of a larger group.
Some of these have been mentioned before and although they are not Football Fans or Cardiff linked, they have links to sport or Cardiff but probably not both.
Michael Moritz - likes to invest in stuff in Cardiff, but not known to be a sports individual.
Admiral Insurance Guy - Dunno his name, but Cardiff based and into his sport.
Who next?
Wasn't Julian Hodge's son a City fan? admittedly im talking of some 30+ years ago.
Hmm. I'd say no. Not that he's not a fan, just, ehhh....
Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:26 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:41 pm
RobbieS wrote:Slight problem with the Red Knight scheme. Man Utd are not on the stock market and therefore if the Glaziers dont want to sell, they don't have to. It's about putting an offer in to tempt them to sell. I suspect the Glaziers are able to service debt and at present have no desire to sell unless they make substantial profit...... So a sale would have to equate to at least a billion quid.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:03 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:30 pm
the blue path wrote:if keith harris had put a fraction of the effort he as put in to the red knights venture in to cardiff city i am sure we would have found new owners by now, i really can't see the point of having him on the board, what is his purpose nobody as ever explained his role, i have read about him brokering deals at west ham ,man city etc, trying to find buyers for newcastle and everton but nothing for us, he's just another leech sucking our club dry, i hope he's successful with the utd takeover then may be the parasite will f**k off ,good rid dance
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:38 pm
Wayne S wrote:Although I think it is stupid to throw £1billion at a single club at least the Red Knight Consortium are (supposedly) fans of Manchester United and have asked for the fans backing by getting them to join the Supporters Trust for Free. Over the last few days their number went from 50k to 80k.
The idea is that there are about 50 fans each chucking in about £15million and others throwing in anythin from £5 to £1million as proper investment to get rid of the current owners and pay off the massive debt. The club will then be run by the book spending what comes in, which, be honest, will be loads.
So do we have this potential? I instantly assume not. But hypothetically what would we need?
We must be talking about £40million tops to pay off debts get rid of the major shareholders and leave enough money to replace short term income streams that have been lost and a bit more for the team.
5 Investors with £5million + 10 More with £1million + 20 more with £250k. Are we that short of millionaires in this country that this would be impossible for a European capital City.
As I said, I assume we do not have that muscle amongst our fans or even just amongst our population. But it's nice to dream.