Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:42 pm
I believe the widely advertised protest is fundamentally flawed.
The protest is against the board and that includes the man who heads a group who we hope will provide the stability we all hope for. What sort of message do you want me to deliver to the Malaysians or for that matter any other group.
The questions asked have been answered at last weeks EGM and been widely publicised. There are no unanswered questions in my opinion. There are questions people dont like the answers to but no unanswered ones.
It is interesting that the person organising the March VOTED AGAINST ME BUYING THE HOUSE OF SPORT SITE which released much needed money into the club. If I had not taken on this LIABILITY the club would already be in Administration, so whats the logic in voting against that motion unless you want to drive the club into Administration. There is no gain in this for me and even after the deal I remain the largest single fit out contractor creditor .
Also if the purpose is to bring down the board then again you are driving the club into Administration because there are no ready replacements. The supporters groups should work with the club, not against it even if you dont entirely agree with it AFTERALL ITS ALL WE HAVE GOT!!!!.
I urge people not to let this get personal and pull together to find a solution, FORGET PERSONAL VENDETTAS and stop and think of what your actions could bring. Please work to attract the investment or even change of ownership but please dont send out the wrong message as we could all live to regret it.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:45 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:46 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:47 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:48 pm
claire wrote:He says lets not let this get personal, yet is clearly having a dig at Annis
HYPOCRITE
Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:49 pm
I'm nowhere near Annis' propaganda train
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:12 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:16 pm
BlooDan wrote:Borley attacking Annis on the other board:I believe the widely advertised protest is fundamentally flawed.
The protest is against the board and that includes the man who heads a group who we hope will provide the stability we all hope for. What sort of message do you want me to deliver to the Malaysians or for that matter any other group.
The questions asked have been answered at last weeks EGM and been widely publicised. There are no unanswered questions in my opinion. There are questions people dont like the answers to but no unanswered ones.
It is interesting that the person organising the March VOTED AGAINST ME BUYING THE HOUSE OF SPORT SITE which released much needed money into the club. If I had not taken on this LIABILITY the club would already be in Administration, so whats the logic in voting against that motion unless you want to drive the club into Administration. There is no gain in this for me and even after the deal I remain the largest single fit out contractor creditor .
Also if the purpose is to bring down the board then again you are driving the club into Administration because there are no ready replacements. The supporters groups should work with the club, not against it even if you dont entirely agree with it AFTERALL ITS ALL WE HAVE GOT!!!!.
This was posted days ago......what's the point of posting again when it appears Annis and SB have been chatting several times since.
I urge people not to let this get personal and pull together to find a solution, FORGET PERSONAL VENDETTAS and stop and think of what your actions could bring. Please work to attract the investment or even change of ownership but please dont send out the wrong message as we could all live to regret it.
Deluded. We are about to start a successful REAL campaign and he wants to try to divide us again? Sound familiar?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:16 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:19 pm
ianfens wrote:BlooDan wrote:Borley attacking Annis on the other board:I believe the widely advertised protest is fundamentally flawed.
The protest is against the board and that includes the man who heads a group who we hope will provide the stability we all hope for. What sort of message do you want me to deliver to the Malaysians or for that matter any other group.
The questions asked have been answered at last weeks EGM and been widely publicised. There are no unanswered questions in my opinion. There are questions people dont like the answers to but no unanswered ones.
It is interesting that the person organising the March VOTED AGAINST ME BUYING THE HOUSE OF SPORT SITE which released much needed money into the club. If I had not taken on this LIABILITY the club would already be in Administration, so whats the logic in voting against that motion unless you want to drive the club into Administration. There is no gain in this for me and even after the deal I remain the largest single fit out contractor creditor .
Also if the purpose is to bring down the board then again you are driving the club into Administration because there are no ready replacements. The supporters groups should work with the club, not against it even if you dont entirely agree with it AFTERALL ITS ALL WE HAVE GOT!!!!.
This was posted days ago......what's the point of posting again when it appears Annis and SB have been chatting several times since.
I urge people not to let this get personal and pull together to find a solution, FORGET PERSONAL VENDETTAS and stop and think of what your actions could bring. Please work to attract the investment or even change of ownership but please dont send out the wrong message as we could all live to regret it.
Deluded. We are about to start a successful REAL campaign and he wants to try to divide us again? Sound familiar?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:19 pm
BlooDan wrote:Borley attacking Annis on the other board:I believe the widely advertised protest is fundamentally flawed.
The protest is against the board and that includes the man who heads a group who we hope will provide the stability we all hope for. What sort of message do you want me to deliver to the Malaysians or for that matter any other group.
The questions asked have been answered at last weeks EGM and been widely publicised. There are no unanswered questions in my opinion. There are questions people dont like the answers to but no unanswered ones.
It is interesting that the person organising the March VOTED AGAINST ME BUYING THE HOUSE OF SPORT SITE which released much needed money into the club. If I had not taken on this LIABILITY the club would already be in Administration, so whats the logic in voting against that motion unless you want to drive the club into Administration. There is no gain in this for me and even after the deal I remain the largest single fit out contractor creditor .
Also if the purpose is to bring down the board then again you are driving the club into Administration because there are no ready replacements. The supporters groups should work with the club, not against it even if you dont entirely agree with it AFTERALL ITS ALL WE HAVE GOT!!!!.
.
Deluded. We are about to start a successful REAL campaign and he wants to try to divide us again? Sound familiar?
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:21 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:25 pm
BlooDan wrote:Sorry I didn't realise it was old. All I want is A UNITED FRONT.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:27 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:28 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:38 pm
ianfens wrote:BlooDan wrote:Sorry I didn't realise it was old. All I want is A UNITED FRONT.
No problem Wolfie.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:40 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:47 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:49 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:52 pm
BlooDan wrote:Yeah I got it, hence my joke. I don't think Sludge did...
Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:15 pm