A forum for all things Cardiff City
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:13 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:15 pm
Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:35 pm
torture the fucker
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:17 pm
I was tempted to click ......... I was never keen on Lynch mobs.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:20 pm
ianfens wrote:I was tempted to click ......... I was never keen on Lynch mobs.
Maybe so.
I clicked because i'm not keen on baby killers.
Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:24 pm
Ross Young wrote:ianfens wrote:I was tempted to click ......... I was never keen on Lynch mobs.
Maybe so.
I clicked because i'm not keen on baby killers.
Well if The Sun or facebook is the voice of Justice.........ah bollox to it....Im not interested.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:27 pm
ianfens wrote:Ross Young wrote:ianfens wrote:I was tempted to click ......... I was never keen on Lynch mobs.
Maybe so.
I clicked because i'm not keen on baby killers.
Well if The Sun or facebook is the voice of Justice.........ah bollox to it....Im not interested.
Ianfens why bother commenting then - this was aimed at people who use facebook and want to show some interest in an evil baby killer who is being protected by the law of the land when infact he should be swinging high!
Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:44 pm
*****************************************
Ianfens why bother commenting then - this was aimed at people who use facebook and want to show some interest in an evil baby killer who is being protected by the law of the land when infact he should be swinging high![/quote]
I mentioned I was tempted....... simple. The likes of you and your sort will never have any real in put on this so why do you bother?
Show interest in a baby killer? how sad.
It may have escaped your attention but there is no capital punishment......particularly for 12 year olds.
Perhaps the Taliban have a website and you can see how much you have in common.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:25 pm
ianfens wrote:*****************************************
Ianfens why bother commenting then - this was aimed at people who use facebook and want to show some interest in an evil baby killer who is being protected by the law of the land when infact he should be swinging high!
I
mentioned I was tempted....... simple. T
[color=#FF0040]he likes of you and your sort will never have any real in put on this so why do you bother?Ianfens - "likes of me n my sort" ?????? i may not have any input but the person that opened the group may well do if they can get the aupport through this group. Show interest in a baby killer? how sad. - You know how that read you are twisting it and being pedantic! IT IS showing an interest in a group set up against the kiler and how the government protect himIt may have escaped your attention but there is no capital punishment......particularly for 12 year olds.I said "he should be swinging high" I KNOW capital punishment does not exist BUT believe me for these evil people that hurt children and kill children THERE should be!
Perhaps the Taliban have a website and you can see how much you have in common.[/[/color]quote]
???????????????
It may have escaped your attention this is not a 12yr old child anymore this is a 27yr old adult who has reoffended and has broken his bail - SO why should he still have his identity protected
I
Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:43 pm
Well now he's old enough lets string the **** up by his ball bag
Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:44 pm
Jez, If he had committed an offence he'd be in court.
It might be something trivial and may be out in a couple of weeks.
His identity is protected because of a lynch mob mentality....... similar to a case of a Portsmouth paedotrician (sp?) whose house was attacked by a mob because they didn't want Paedophilles in their area. (Yes it's true)
So you want to hang a guy aged 27 for somthing that accured in 1993 aged 10-11 ?
As for my comment reg. the Taliban........ google sharia law.....you have something in common.
If you really want to help ...... why not visit the local NSPCC office and hand over £50 instead of going on the piss next time.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:46 pm
ianfens wrote:Jez, If he had committed an offence he'd be in court.
It might be something trivial and may be out in a couple of weeks.
His identity is protected because of a lynch mob mentality....... similar to a case of a Portsmouth paedotrician (sp?) whose house was attacked by a mob because they didn't want Paedophilles in their area. (Yes it's true)
So you want to hang a guy aged 27 for somthing that accured in 1993 aged 10-11 ?
As for my comment reg. the Taliban........ google sharia law.....you have something in common.
If you really want to help ...... why not visit the local NSPCC office and hand over £50 instead of going on the piss next time.
My personal opinion is hanging isnt good enough for him, what they did was sick, they arent human as far as im concerned. But we all have different views no point falling out over some sick twisted little f**k.
Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:55 pm
ianfens wrote:Jez, If he had committed an offence he'd be in court.
It might be something trivial and may be out in a couple of weeks.
His identity is protected because of a lynch mob mentality....... similar to a case of a Portsmouth paedotrician (sp?) whose house was attacked by a mob because they didn't want Paedophilles in their area. (Yes it's true)
So you want to hang a guy aged 27 for somthing that accured in 1993 aged 10-11 ?
As for my comment reg. the Taliban........ google sharia law.....you have something in common.
If you really want to help ...... why not visit the local NSPCC office and hand over £50 instead of going on the piss next time.
The government have guaranteed no one will ever know the details so i wont get into that discussion with you.
You know nothing about me to compare me with the taliban!!! but i am not getting into a tit 4 tat with you - you are a menial in all this - i was just replying to you out of politeness - wish i had just left you under your stone,
AND i dont have to explain to you BUT I have given to the NSPCC and Cancer research monthly out of my wages since i was 18! £50 quid on alcohol YOU DO NOT NO ME - I cannot afford that in a month for 4/5 nights out never mind in one go!
but i still support both charities which i feel very strongly about!
Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:01 pm
ianfens wrote:Jez, If he had committed an offence he'd be in court.
No he wouldn't, he broke the terms of his licence. He may not have even committed an offence but what he did he knew he would run the risk of going back inside.
He's an evil, twisted baby killer and if social networking sites are good tools for influencing people, then so be it. He should have his anonymity lifted. If he lived anywhere near my young nieces I, and my brother and his wife, would want to know that a child killer is walking the streets near their house
Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:08 pm
The Rhooster wrote:ianfens wrote:Jez, If he had committed an offence he'd be in court.
It might be something trivial and may be out in a couple of weeks.
His identity is protected because of a lynch mob mentality....... similar to a case of a Portsmouth paedotrician (sp?) whose house was attacked by a mob because they didn't want Paedophilles in their area. (Yes it's true)
So you want to hang a guy aged 27 for somthing that accured in 1993 aged 10-11 ?
As for my comment reg. the Taliban........ google sharia law.....you have something in common.
If you really want to help ...... why not visit the local NSPCC office and hand over £50 instead of going on the piss next time.
My personal opinion is hanging isnt good enough for him, what they did was sick, they arent human as far as im concerned. But we all have different views no point falling out over some sick twisted little f**k.
Of course they were sick...... Parents needed a word with too.
Im all for Law and Order......but let's not be selective eh?
Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:09 pm
Hang the b*stard,should have done it years ago.Bring back capital punishment,
Thu Mar 04, 2010 9:16 pm
Hang the tw*t by his knob
Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:16 pm
IANFENS - child pornography is the update - i still say HANG HIM!
still my opinion but he is EVIL through and through
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.