carl i believe i asked you this question

i asked what the clubs break even figure was at CCS,i believe the answer given was 18000,so as far as i am aware this figure has been exceeded on all games except 1.So barring the original debt why are we still haemoraging money

i asked what the clubs break even figure was at CCS,i believe the answer given was 18000,so as far as i am aware this figure has been exceeded on all games except 1.So barring the original debt why are we still haemoraging money

It was never the breakeven figure, but I think it was mentioned that it was a budgeted figure. To breakeven we'd probably need around 50k attendances at the moment!
It still means which should be generating more income that we budgeted for though.

i asked what the clubs break even figure was at CCS,i believe the answer given was 18000,so as far as i am aware this figure has been exceeded on all games except 1.So barring the original debt why are we still haemoraging money

It was never the breakeven figure, but I think it was mentioned that it was a budgeted figure. To breakeven we'd probably need around 50k attendances at the moment!
It still means which should be generating more income that we budgeted for though.

it shows that the fans have done there bit and it was upto the money men to do the rest

i asked what the clubs break even figure was at CCS,i believe the answer given was 18000,so as far as i am aware this figure has been exceeded on all games except 1.So barring the original debt why are we still haemoraging money

It was never the breakeven figure, but I think it was mentioned that it was a budgeted figure. To breakeven we'd probably need around 50k attendances at the moment!
It still means which should be generating more income that we budgeted for though.

I have heard the 18000 figure being quoted as a break even figure and it was around 13000 at Ninian Park.

i asked what the clubs break even figure was at CCS,i believe the answer given was 18000,so as far as i am aware this figure has been exceeded on all games except 1.So barring the original debt why are we still haemoraging money

It was never the breakeven figure, but I think it was mentioned that it was a budgeted figure. To breakeven we'd probably need around 50k attendances at the moment!
It still means which should be generating more income that we budgeted for though.

If thats the case (and I expect it is) did we, unbelievably, budget for investment from an outside source this year?

the budgeted figure is 18000 Kevin and we are losing money because of the massive wages we are paying out to players and staff

The answer is in the detail. Such figures/ attendances have never been quoted as "breaking even" merely "budgeted" for. A world of difference.

so either someone hasnt done there maths properly,or not all relevent information given to the person working this out or bullshyt