Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:50 pm
Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:53 pm
Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:54 pm
Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:00 pm
Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:48 am
Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:41 am
Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:45 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:A don't buy policy is my idea.
Encourage everyone not to buy season tickets, 50/50 draw tickets, cancel their Academy Foundation Scheme D/D, boycott food & drink outlets and the club shop.
Cut off all income streams into the club and if anyone knows sponsors encourage them not to sponsor games, match balls or players.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:04 am
piledriver64 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:A don't buy policy is my idea.
Encourage everyone not to buy season tickets, 50/50 draw tickets, cancel their Academy Foundation Scheme D/D, boycott food & drink outlets and the club shop.
Cut off all income streams into the club and if anyone knows sponsors encourage them not to sponsor games, match balls or players.
I posted the following on a thread last week and I really think we need to be careful about how we make our feelings heard :
So are you proposing that we now hasten the demise of our club
The problem here is that if we do hit them in the pocket we run the risk of not only getting rid of the board but the club as well
And before anyone says that we can go into Administration and start again just remember a couple of things:
1. HMRC are taking Portsmouth back to court to dispute whether administration should be allowed, it isn't a rubber stamping job !
2. The consequences of Administration are long lasting and not a simple 10 point deduction. Assets (e.g. players) will be sold, credit rating plummets, clubs will demand transfer fees upfront, possible additional points deduction next season as well and an inability to attract the calibre of players/management we have been used to. In short, recovery would take years.
3. Administration relies on creditors agreeing to take a hit on debts. The only secured debtor is PMG. That means administration depends on Borley, Hammam, etc. agreeing to it, are you 100% confident of that ? If not then we have a real possibility of being wound up and no club.
4. If we go into Administration we are still relying on a takeover and whilst it may be cheaper at that point on the face of it (if the creditors agree) it won't necessarily be any more attractive as assets will still have to be sold to satisfy creditors wherever possible e.g. if the Administrator receives bids for Marshall, McNaughton, Matthews, Whitts, McPhail, McCormack, Chopra, Bothroyd that in total would result in the creditors getting 100% of their money back then that is what he is duty bound to do. He would have to wait until the summer but it will happen, just as it will with Palace.
People now need to think before making certain statements. This situation is serious and we need some answers but could you live with yourself if you contributed to the final demise of our club ? I know I couldn't.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:08 am
Nuclearblue wrote:To keep the spotlight on the Riddler. I suggested it earlier and it has been mentioned else where. How about the chocolate and amber scarfs a visual impact. Ideas anyone
Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:55 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:A don't buy policy is my idea.
Encourage everyone not to buy season tickets, 50/50 draw tickets, cancel their Academy Foundation Scheme D/D, boycott food & drink outlets and the club shop.
Cut off all income streams into the club and if anyone knows sponsors encourage them not to sponsor games, match balls or players.
I posted the following on a thread last week and I really think we need to be careful about how we make our feelings heard :
So are you proposing that we now hasten the demise of our club
The problem here is that if we do hit them in the pocket we run the risk of not only getting rid of the board but the club as well
And before anyone says that we can go into Administration and start again just remember a couple of things:
1. HMRC are taking Portsmouth back to court to dispute whether administration should be allowed, it isn't a rubber stamping job !
2. The consequences of Administration are long lasting and not a simple 10 point deduction. Assets (e.g. players) will be sold, credit rating plummets, clubs will demand transfer fees upfront, possible additional points deduction next season as well and an inability to attract the calibre of players/management we have been used to. In short, recovery would take years.
3. Administration relies on creditors agreeing to take a hit on debts. The only secured debtor is PMG. That means administration depends on Borley, Hammam, etc. agreeing to it, are you 100% confident of that ? If not then we have a real possibility of being wound up and no club.
4. If we go into Administration we are still relying on a takeover and whilst it may be cheaper at that point on the face of it (if the creditors agree) it won't necessarily be any more attractive as assets will still have to be sold to satisfy creditors wherever possible e.g. if the Administrator receives bids for Marshall, McNaughton, Matthews, Whitts, McPhail, McCormack, Chopra, Bothroyd that in total would result in the creditors getting 100% of their money back then that is what he is duty bound to do. He would have to wait until the summer but it will happen, just as it will with Palace.
People now need to think before making certain statements. This situation is serious and we need some answers but could you live with yourself if you contributed to the final demise of our club ? I know I couldn't.
And I'm sure the board want to avoid the above as well.
However, whilst we hand over cash without conditions they will continue to line their own pockets first and put the interests of the club second.
Nothing will change by running scared of the things you have posted above as they will happen any way unless we can force Ridsdale & Co to cooperate with us and use our money more wisely.
There is more than one way to contribute towards the demise of our club and your suggestion we shouldn't use our financial clout is another one. What I can live with is the fact I gave the club a chance when I coughed up £600 in November, but having been let down by the club I have drawn a line in the sand and plan to stand up to them.
You might believe in a football verision of the tooth fairy, but as life has taught me if you want change something then you have to get off your arse and do something rather than hide behind the blanket.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 8:59 am
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:04 am
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:16 am
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:21 am
Dobbin wrote:Yes it was me that mentioned the chocolate and amber scarves - Said maybe the trust should get some down and get them sold at a small profit
I believe the green and gold scarves for Man Utd were being sold by them for a fiver.
The problem is would the trust support such a campaign ?
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:23 am
ackers1927 wrote:Dobbin wrote:Yes it was me that mentioned the chocolate and amber scarves - Said maybe the trust should get some down and get them sold at a small profit
I believe the green and gold scarves for Man Utd were being sold by them for a fiver.
The problem is would the trust support such a campaign ?
The scarves are a great idea! But I think why stop there, get t shirt and wristband etc made,quiz nights,guest speaker dinners, or anything we could sell to make a small profit. Then whatever is made is put into a bank account. Hopefully we can raise enough to save our club.
The trust and the supporters club should support anything that is trying to raise funds for the supporters to buy the club. If not then Annis, Carl, The Rooster, Big Gywn etc should set up something.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:37 am
piledriver64 wrote:
I don't think I said anything in my post that could be construed as me believing in "a football version of the tooth fairy" or being someone who would "hide behind a blanket" and that is pretty insulting I was merely entering into the debate, with a different viewpoint, as to how best to make our feelings heard.
The march was successful because it was co-ordinated and showed an underlying support of OUR club, not the board. In my view reducing the ever dwindling income streams further is a way of ensuring Administration and that does not gauruntee the removal of Riddler as it is common practice for Administrators to keep Chief Execs in place for a period. If the Malaysians don't come in now then I seriously doubt whether they ever will do and therefore our future Championship status my be in serious doubt.
I forked out over £1k for my ST along with my 2 daughters (one full price) so I am in just the same position as you on that score. You and I differ on the best way forward but the point I will continue to make is that Admin is not the end of our problems, just the beginning. The road to recovery would be a very long one and it could take 4, 5 even 6 years to get back to where we are now, just ask Leeds
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:47 am
Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:57 am
piledriver64 wrote:Tony - I think we'll have to agree to disagree
If you re-read your comments I think you'll recognise that you were insinuating that I am someone who will sit back and do nothing .... I am not. Whilst I accept you have different opinion that part of your post was unnecessary just because we disagreed on methods.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:14 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Tony - I think we'll have to agree to disagree
If you re-read your comments I think you'll recognise that you were insinuating that I am someone who will sit back and do nothing .... I am not. Whilst I accept you have different opinion that part of your post was unnecessary just because we disagreed on methods.
So why put in a roll eyes smiley if there's no need to (twice in fact)? I really hate this its OK for me but not you attitude Look mate saying you are waiting for the tooth fairy to arrive isn't any more insulting than using a put down smiley, so stop the victim angle.
And frankly until you do explain what exactly you do propose as 'something different' to the protests apart from continuing to give Ridsdale your cash, then I have no alternative but to assume you are a do nothing guy.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:00 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:A don't buy policy is my idea.
Encourage everyone not to buy season tickets, 50/50 draw tickets, cancel their Academy Foundation Scheme D/D, boycott food & drink outlets and the club shop.
Cut off all income streams into the club and if anyone knows sponsors encourage them not to sponsor games, match balls or players.
Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:01 pm
The Rhooster wrote:visual theme, what if we all dress like this
Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm
Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:17 pm