Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:39 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:41 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:46 pm
CraigCCFC wrote:they did. the cps deemed there was a lack of evidence
Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:48 pm
krabb wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:they did. the cps deemed there was a lack of evidence
didnt realise.....stinks of a cover up then
Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:55 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:55 pm
krabb wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:they did. the cps deemed there was a lack of evidence
didnt realise.....stinks of a cover up then
Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:26 pm
glas wrote:BBC (if allegations are true) have lost all credibility now, as they are the first to slag off/report on News of World/Murdoch scandals and the catholic church, but now it seems they have been covering something up.
How will they investigate or report this?
Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:28 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:31 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:41 pm
glas wrote:BBC (if allegations are true) have lost all credibility now, as they are the first to slag off/report on News of World/Murdoch scandals and the catholic church, but now it seems they have been covering something up.
How will they investigate or report this?
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:11 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:13 pm
2blue2handle wrote:It may or may not be true but I don't feel comfortable with the way it's come out after his death, they had plenty of one before to comment.
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:16 pm
Karl wrote:2blue2handle wrote:It may or may not be true but I don't feel comfortable with the way it's come out after his death, they had plenty of one before to comment.
It's not that simple though is it?
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:19 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Karl wrote:2blue2handle wrote:It may or may not be true but I don't feel comfortable with the way it's come out after his death, they had plenty of one before to comment.
It's not that simple though is it?
Why?
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:25 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:32 pm
Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:47 pm
Karl wrote:When it comes to child abuse I don't think there is such thing as "usual dribble".
Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:09 am
paulh_85 wrote:krabb wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:they did. the cps deemed there was a lack of evidence
didnt realise.....stinks of a cover up then
orrrrrrrrr the fact he is not guilty
Thu Oct 04, 2012 11:56 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:paulh_85 wrote:krabb wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:they did. the cps deemed there was a lack of evidence
didnt realise.....stinks of a cover up then
orrrrrrrrr the fact he is not guilty
B
Few facts for the idiots and nonce defenders.
Rumours of Jimmy SaVILE having relations with young teenagers have been around for years and years. FACT
News of the World editor during the 90s twice wanted to run the story but on both occasions were shout down by various parties FACT
A few years ago WHILE SaVILE was alive you may remember the massive child abuse scandal in a Jersey childrens home, Sir Jimmys name came up a number of times during the investigation yet the police threw it away as hearsay. FACT
Complaints have been made to the police many times over the years while Savile was alive yet the CPS deemed the evidence not be sufficient FACT
Jimmy Savile was a very powerful and well connected man, a lot more powerful than most people can think and loved by millions, very daunting for young girls to come out and make allegations particularly when certain close people knew FACT
Just because he is now dead does not mean he is innocent FACThoww
Finally, listen to his views on Gary Glitter a friend of his a few years h.. Absolutely sickening and very bizarre.
How. About he fact he can't defend himsellf now that is a fact!
The man has always been a weirdo, I always knew he was a nonce.
Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:14 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:paulh_85 wrote:krabb wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:they did. the cps deemed there was a lack of evidence
didnt realise.....stinks of a cover up then
orrrrrrrrr the fact he is not guilty
Few facts for the idiots and nonce defenders.
Rumours of Jimmy SaVILE having relations with young teenagers have been around for years and years. FACT
News of the World editor during the 90s twice wanted to run the story but on both occasions were shout down by various parties FACT
A few years ago WHILE SaVILE was alive you may remember the massive child abuse scandal in a Jersey childrens home, Sir Jimmys name came up a number of times during the investigation yet the police threw it away as hearsay. FACT
Complaints have been made to the police many times over the years while Savile was alive yet the CPS deemed the evidence not be sufficient FACT
Jimmy Savile was a very powerful and well connected man, a lot more powerful than most people can think and loved by millions, very daunting for young girls to come out and make allegations particularly when certain close people knew FACT
Just because he is now dead does not mean he is innocent FACT
Finally, listen to his views on Gary Glitter a friend of his a few years ago. Absolutely sickening and very bizarre.
The man has always been a weirdo, I always knew he was a nonce.
Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:17 pm
Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:56 am
Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:21 am
bluebirdbaz wrote:A peado is a peado....dead or alive
Fri Oct 05, 2012 8:42 am
Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:08 am
Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:10 am
Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:07 pm
totally agree everyone seemed to know about it but f**k all was done about it, and the c**t never ever answered one of my letters but alas i am glad i never worked in a nuclear power station after allNuclearblue wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:A peado is a peado....dead or alive
Correct Baz but what is the point of all this now ? He is dead what they gonna do dig him up and stick him in the dock ? What they should be looking at is who if true covered it up ? Justice is not going to be done now and he is not here to defend himself. It reminds me of lynch mobs from estates who have nothing better to do and jostle prison vans and vent there fury at someone that hasn't been found guilty at that point.
All these so called experts that say he is guilty FFS the only place his guilt can be confirmed is a court of law. Or has the FA found him guilty instead.
If he is guilty then I hope he is in hell now. I know it's not looking good for him but this should of been done when he was alive.
Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:15 pm
Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:24 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:totally agree everyone seemed to know about it but f**k all was done about it, and the c**t never ever answered one of my letters but alas i am glad i never worked in a nuclear power station after allNuclearblue wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:A peado is a peado....dead or alive
Correct Baz but what is the point of all this now ? He is dead what they gonna do dig him up and stick him in the dock ? What they should be looking at is who if true covered it up ? Justice is not going to be done now and he is not here to defend himself. It reminds me of lynch mobs from estates who have nothing better to do and jostle prison vans and vent there fury at someone that hasn't been found guilty at that point.
All these so called experts that say he is guilty FFS the only place his guilt can be confirmed is a court of law. Or has the FA found him guilty instead.
If he is guilty then I hope he is in hell now. I know it's not looking good for him but this should of been done when he was alive.
instead i have T Fish as my man bitch
Fri Oct 05, 2012 10:59 pm