Sun Oct 07, 2018 9:40 am
maccydee wrote:fred keenor wrote:Im sure the club will appeal and this will be overturned.
Awful and cynical but never a red.
VAR surely is needed asap
It will not be over turned nor should it be.
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:26 am
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:43 am
Igovernor wrote:maccydee wrote:fred keenor wrote:Im sure the club will appeal and this will be overturned.
Awful and cynical but never a red.
VAR surely is needed asap
It will not be over turned nor should it be.
Got to say I have seen a lot worse than that and only a yellow given!
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:47 am
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:49 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:Just seen it on MOTD.
It’s a clear red, referee made the right decision.
Sun Oct 07, 2018 1:16 pm
Forever Blue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Just seen it on MOTD.
It’s a clear red, referee made the right decision.
Totally agree Ned, tackle was late and reckless by Joe Ralls.
Sun Oct 07, 2018 1:48 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Forever Blue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Just seen it on MOTD.
It’s a clear red, referee made the right decision.
Totally agree Ned, tackle was late and reckless by Joe Ralls.
Acid test is if it was other way around and spurs player got a yellow would city fans be happy ? Not a chance be a red card all day they would say
Sun Oct 07, 2018 2:48 pm
Steve Zodiak wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Forever Blue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Just seen it on MOTD.
It’s a clear red, referee made the right decision.
Totally agree Ned, tackle was late and reckless by Joe Ralls.
Acid test is if it was other way around and spurs player got a yellow would city fans be happy ? Not a chance be a red card all day they would say
Of course it was red and if one of their players had done it I guarantee every poster on here would say it was 100% a red card.
Sun Oct 07, 2018 3:32 pm
pembroke allan wrote:BluebirdNorth wrote:Reading some posts online you'd think ralls took his head off even some pundits were saying clear red, no idea where they are coming from, wasn't even that high of a challenge.
Alan you need to look at that again, same tackle today and a yellow brandished Ralls no where near goal, and not a dangerous tackle he went across him knee high, i dont know what people see watching a tackle but that wad never a red card, can you tell me why dean went to pull out of his left pocket a yellow, was surrounded by spurs players, put the card back in and then pulls the red out of his right pocket, it is now not allowed to surround the ref, but nothing happened no cards, kane shoul have been red carded, fir grabbing hold of Ralls
He went in with two feet from behind halfway up his body! Letissier thinks either lino or 4th official made the call as ref seemed to go for yellow card, but at end day it was a totally unnecessary tackle and cannot argue about red as was reckless however way you look at it .
Sun Oct 07, 2018 3:44 pm
Igovernor wrote:pembroke allan wrote:BluebirdNorth wrote:Reading some posts online you'd think ralls took his head off even some pundits were saying clear red, no idea where they are coming from, wasn't even that high of a challenge.
Alan you need to look at that again, same tackle today and a yellow brandished Ralls no where near goal, and not a dangerous tackle he went across him knee high, i dont know what people see watching a tackle but that wad never a red card, can you tell me why dean went to pull out of his left pocket a yellow, was surrounded by spurs players, put the card back in and then pulls the red out of his right pocket, it is now not allowed to surround the ref, but nothing happened no cards, kane shoul have been red carded, fir grabbing hold of Ralls
He went in with two feet from behind halfway up his body! Letissier thinks either lino or 4th official made the call as ref seemed to go for yellow card, but at end day it was a totally unnecessary tackle and cannot argue about red as was reckless however way you look at it .
Sun Oct 07, 2018 4:22 pm
Sun Oct 07, 2018 8:38 pm
Sun Oct 07, 2018 10:12 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 7:47 am
Mon Oct 08, 2018 8:46 am
Mon Oct 08, 2018 9:46 am
PtB wrote:It’s not a red card offence. It’s a reckless trip near the halfway line to stop a promising attack. There is no excessive force and he doesn’t endanger the safety of his opponent. A yellow card should have been shown and I agree with NW in that a yellow was coming until other parties got involved and made it look worse than it was.
Go have a look at the at the Danny Swanson tackle in yesterday’s St Johnstone v Celtic match if you want to see a sending off offence!
Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:15 pm
pembroke allan wrote:PtB wrote:It’s not a red card offence. It’s a reckless trip near the halfway line to stop a promising attack. There is no excessive force and he doesn’t endanger the safety of his opponent. A yellow card should have been shown and I agree with NW in that a yellow was coming until other parties got involved and made it look worse than it was.
Go have a look at the at the Danny Swanson tackle in yesterday’s St Johnstone v Celtic match if you want to see a sending off offence!
Each tackle is made in its on merits same as refs decision is made on individual cases, But ralls tackle a trip??
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:14 pm
PtB wrote:pembroke allan wrote:PtB wrote:It’s not a red card offence. It’s a reckless trip near the halfway line to stop a promising attack. There is no excessive force and he doesn’t endanger the safety of his opponent. A yellow card should have been shown and I agree with NW in that a yellow was coming until other parties got involved and made it look worse than it was.
Go have a look at the at the Danny Swanson tackle in yesterday’s St Johnstone v Celtic match if you want to see a sending off offence!
Each tackle is made in its on merits same as refs decision is made on individual cases, But ralls tackle a trip??
Yes. He’s played his legs, albeit a little high. As before though, no excessive force or endangerment of opponents safety. I’ve spoke to 8 other refs now and looked over the clips and only one felt red.
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:45 pm
pembroke allan wrote:PtB wrote:pembroke allan wrote:PtB wrote:It’s not a red card offence. It’s a reckless trip near the halfway line to stop a promising attack. There is no excessive force and he doesn’t endanger the safety of his opponent. A yellow card should have been shown and I agree with NW in that a yellow was coming until other parties got involved and made it look worse than it was.
Go have a look at the at the Danny Swanson tackle in yesterday’s St Johnstone v Celtic match if you want to see a sending off offence!
Each tackle is made in its on merits same as refs decision is made on individual cases, But ralls tackle a trip??
Yes. He’s played his legs, albeit a little high. As before though, no excessive force or endangerment of opponents safety. I’ve spoke to 8 other refs now and looked over the clips and only one felt red.
Yes he played his legs but he came from behind and thigh high which.msde it dangerous, tbh the way he went at it looked as if he kicked out at player yes seen worse get yellow seen less get red thats football? A trip means ankles not thighs, was such a stupid thing to do pull him back or block him, go for ankles they get you a yellow what he did opened himself to get red so cannot see it being overturned .
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:57 pm
pembroke allan wrote:PtB wrote:pembroke allan wrote:PtB wrote:It’s not a red card offence. It’s a reckless trip near the halfway line to stop a promising attack. There is no excessive force and he doesn’t endanger the safety of his opponent. A yellow card should have been shown and I agree with NW in that a yellow was coming until other parties got involved and made it look worse than it was.
Go have a look at the at the Danny Swanson tackle in yesterday’s St Johnstone v Celtic match if you want to see a sending off offence!
Each tackle is made in its on merits same as refs decision is made on individual cases, But ralls tackle a trip??
Yes. He’s played his legs, albeit a little high. As before though, no excessive force or endangerment of opponents safety. I’ve spoke to 8 other refs now and looked over the clips and only one felt red.
Yes he played his legs but he came from behind and thigh high which.msde it dangerous, tbh the way he went at it looked as if he kicked out at player yes seen worse get yellow seen less get red thats football? A trip means ankles not thighs, was such a stupid thing to do pull him back or block him, go for ankles they get you a yellow what he did opened himself to get red so cannot see it being overturned .
Tue Oct 09, 2018 1:20 am
Tue Oct 09, 2018 11:15 am
Tue Oct 09, 2018 11:52 am
paulh_85 wrote:No doubt it was a red. Anyone saying otherwise Is blinkered
Tue Oct 09, 2018 11:53 am
BlueDredd wrote:Wasn't dangerous, wasn't an obvious goal scoring opportunity, studs not showing. Nothing more than a forceful and cynical trip.
Never in a million should that be a red by the letter of the law.
Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:09 pm
BlueDredd wrote:Wasn't dangerous, wasn't an obvious goal scoring opportunity, studs not showing. Nothing more than a forceful and cynical trip.
Never in a million should that be a red by the letter of the law.