OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
NyeBluebird wrote:Cardiff City unsuccessful in appealing Joe Ralls' red card. As a result the midfielder will miss games against Fulham, Liverpool and Leicester.
Absolute joke IMO, never a red in the first place and to uphold it is even worse, but I guess our club's name isn't Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea or Arsenal.
dogfound wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:Cardiff City unsuccessful in appealing Joe Ralls' red card. As a result the midfielder will miss games against Fulham, Liverpool and Leicester.
Absolute joke IMO, never a red in the first place and to uphold it is even worse, but I guess our club's name isn't Liverpool, Man Utd, Chelsea or Arsenal.
didn't really hold up much hope for us in the appeal tbh…..maybe Joe should have gone 2 footed straight through him .
a strange one to say the least.....interesting that all the refs that said not red quoted the rules and those that agreed with the red like posters on here quoted a bunch of stuff not in the rules....rules need changing
NyeBluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
Not a red in accordance with the laws of the game, but then again they seem to be ignored more regularly recently.
maccydee wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
Not a red in accordance with the laws of the game, but then again they seem to be ignored more regularly recently.
The rules of the game say it was a definite red.
JimCP91 wrote:maccydee wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
Not a red in accordance with the laws of the game, but then again they seem to be ignored more regularly recently.
The rules of the game say it was a definite red.
Under which rule? He definitely didnt stop a clear goalscoring opportunity and in my opinion it wasn't serious foul play. It was a a good foul, which happens almost every week and deserved a yellow card.
maccydee wrote:JimCP91 wrote:maccydee wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
Not a red in accordance with the laws of the game, but then again they seem to be ignored more regularly recently.
The rules of the game say it was a definite red.
Under which rule? He definitely didnt stop a clear goalscoring opportunity and in my opinion it wasn't serious foul play. It was a a good foul, which happens almost every week and deserved a yellow card.
See above Jiminy. No attempt to play the ball and it was excessive.
A little tug of the shirt and it wouldn’t have been excessive.
pembroke allan wrote:maccydee wrote:JimCP91 wrote:maccydee wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
Not a red in accordance with the laws of the game, but then again they seem to be ignored more regularly recently.
The rules of the game say it was a definite red.
Under which rule? He definitely didnt stop a clear goalscoring opportunity and in my opinion it wasn't serious foul play. It was a a good foul, which happens almost every week and deserved a yellow card.
See above Jiminy. No attempt to play the ball and it was excessive.
A little tug of the shirt and it wouldn’t have been excessive.
A good foul!!! If that is a good foul hate to see bad one? A good foul in those circumstances was a tug of shirt , block player or tap ankles all yellow card offences, his "good foul" doesn't fall under those categories does it?
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:maccydee wrote:JimCP91 wrote:maccydee wrote:NyeBluebird wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Unfortunately, I knew it was a red and would be upheld.
Let’s hope Gunnarsson/Damour can step up if that’s the way he goes.
Not a red in accordance with the laws of the game, but then again they seem to be ignored more regularly recently.
The rules of the game say it was a definite red.
Under which rule? He definitely didnt stop a clear goalscoring opportunity and in my opinion it wasn't serious foul play. It was a a good foul, which happens almost every week and deserved a yellow card.
See above Jiminy. No attempt to play the ball and it was excessive.
A little tug of the shirt and it wouldn’t have been excessive.
A good foul!!! If that is a good foul hate to see bad one? A good foul in those circumstances was a tug of shirt , block player or tap ankles all yellow card offences, his "good foul" doesn't fall under those categories does it?
Jim is spot on.
Sneggyblubird wrote:Red card all day for me though,the silly bit was appealing imo.
Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Red card all day for me though,the silly bit was appealing imo.
100% agree with you Martin and we don't agree on much
Late tackle and reckless and We were daft to appeal.
rhondda 1015 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:Red card all day for me though,the silly bit was appealing imo.
100% agree with you Martin and we don't agree on much
Late tackle and reckless and We were daft to appeal.
The two of you are spot on, what a waste of time appealing.
Trefelin06 wrote:When we were governed by the welsh FA were any of you complaining when 10 out of the 12 "independent" panel were cardiff city season ticket holders and based in cardiff.... To this day i cannot remember a swansea red card appeal being successfull. Obviously you lot were up in arms
Whistler wrote:A Straight red in any man's language, the ball was 8 yards away when he tackled him knee high and was not in control with both feet off the ground!!!!! A 3 game ban is to be expected. END OF CONVERSATION
Users browsing this forum: BLUE54, Clickagy [Bot], darko, Google [Bot], ias [Bot], Igovernor, Porthy123, Proximic [Bot] and 189 guests