Wed May 08, 2019 1:22 pm
Sven wrote:
No heinous crime for most but a daft question because you really know the answer to that...
I was basically accusing you of being a 'multi' and I stand by that
Between us (and I take my portion of blame) we have managed to de-rail what should have been a positive thread
My PM box is open...
Wed May 08, 2019 1:37 pm
FAWman wrote:Sven wrote:
Did I say the information on Sala was incorrect?
Did I 'abuse' you?
Get your own facts right, Multi Man and keep to defending your own actions rather than picking up on other peoples; most of whom, including Dahboy, assuming you are not him, can defend themselves quite adequately and don't need crusaders like you to muddy their cause
Perhaps you're looking for some kind of sanitisation of the Forum? You know, the kind when you (as always) are the ONLY person that can have a valid opinion and woe-betide anyone who disagrees or questions it; just the same as you accuse me of doing!
I fully appreciate that my style and some of the things/ways I say what I do are not to everyones taste but then again, the same could be said the other way round
You, however, believe your own hype and are clearly frustrated; certainly as a poster (I will qualify by stating that I don't know you as a person, so as ever cannot possibly comment)
For some reason (and we both know why) I seem to have gotten to you, despite our on-line paths crossing infrequently under your 'FAWMan' name
Let's get something straight, right here and right now; you haven't 'called me out' at all and you need to read up what that actually means. You are certainly the one with the chip on your shoulder and you are the one who believes you are perpetually the only one with a valid opinion
In the interest of other users, time to take this off-Forum and you can contact me via pm, where I'll be more than happy to discuss your bitterness and some of the false comments/observations you have made above and in your previous posts
- Did I say that you said it was wrong? I said that you criticised me for my first post being correct, which is just weird.
- I wouldn’t say abuse, no. You have lied about me repeatedly though. The comment of abuse was more noting that you abuse others by calling them WUM’s, trolls etc all because you don’t like their views on club matters.
- I am not a crusader, I am sticking up for people on here that you tread on to fulfil whatever you are missing in your life. These guys are football fans wishing to express an opinion and don’t need the likes of your putting them down every 5 seconds simply because you don’t like it.
- you are going off on some bonkers path here, why would you have “gotten to me”. I couldn’t give a damn what you throw at me sonny, I am sticking up for other users of this forum and supporters of this club.
- I have very little interest in PMing you. I suggest in future you may be better served taking your boring and futile feuds with Dahboy to PM then? Sparing us all from reading them. How’s that for a suggestion?
Wed May 08, 2019 2:45 pm
Sven wrote:
Quote (FAWman): "Should I see that then I may consider offering the olive branch..."
Who on Earth do you think you are?
I think one doth protest a little too much, fella and you seem to be getting more frustrated by the post but it's good to see you backing off a little now you realise you have clearly misinterpreted/mis-understood some of my comments and/or intentions
It's certainly a suggestion but I'm still confused as to what 'feud' I have with Dahboy or certain others; it's just an exchange of views that are often sprinkled with humour that shouldn't be taken too seriously (and I don't think they are)
Why you're getting involved with other people's business is still confusing, as to do so is certainly 'crusading'; unless, of course, you are them...or some of them
I've had a look at your latest post (it has been noted) on another thread is a great example of you (a) stating the obvious, and (b) dressing up a clear statistical fact as your own thinking!
PS: I'm certainly not your 'sonny' (he was my late uncle) and to claim such means you are quite a lot older than your limited vocabulary suggests
Last words (on this subject) from me, so feel free to have the last say (another of your traits) if you must
Wed May 08, 2019 2:53 pm
FAWman wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sven wrote:FAWman wrote:Sven, your obsession with all things to do with the Jacks and Dahboy is getting very tedious to read. As a moderator you should be championing all views, not just churning out the same repetitive nonsense while shutting down people’s opinions that don’t fit yours, grow up man. You are not doing the forum any favours whatsoever.
Anyway, as for this news. Mixed feelings. I personally think it would be better to have a longer term plan and bring in a manager that wants his own players that he can mould into a side capable of not only going up but staying there. Yes Warnock has a very good track record in the Championship but a horrific one in the PL across numerous clubs and the style of play is, well, not very entertaining shall we say.
I don’t see much point in VT investing in a squad that the next manager will very likely want to overhaul. Neil is 72 next year (?!), so it’s pretty safe to say he isn’t here for the long term.
Fella, I don't mention the Jacks much and Dahboy knows it's banter because of his negativity and my general positivity when it comes to the club
I think you need to separate the two (poster and Moderator) and look first at your own posts, profanities and tone before you criticise others for their writing styles
Nothing else you write above (re investment and Warnock's age) is anything other than stating the obvious
Sven / Chris is def not obsessed with the Jacks.
Plus as a moderator Sven is entitled to his own personal views 100%
Of course he is. Although opinion and constant droning and name calling about people who disagree with him is not really an opinion. Also accusing people of using profanities when I don’t think I ever have on a forum in my life is also unhelpful.
You are allowed your own opinion but you are not allowed your own facts. You should be behind the fight against this sort behaviour regardless of who it is from, it does quickly bring a forum down a level. We will have to agree to disagree regarding the obsession part then, I always allow the content of someone’s posts to be the deciding factor on that, and with that in mind I don’t think there is much doubt, but you are entitled to your opinion.