nojac wrote:I wanted them both to lose .
andy 189 wrote:The swans were crap they'll finish mid table at best paper thin squad we hammered them yet again poor finishing cost us but we still played well no need to worry cos in Bielsa we trust ..alaw..
BroBlue wrote:andy 189 wrote:The swans were crap they'll finish mid table at best paper thin squad we hammered them yet again poor finishing cost us but we still played well no need to worry cos in Bielsa we trust ..alaw..
I'm not really sure it counts as 'hammering them' if you actually lose the game, especially considering Leeds had home advantage .
andy 189 wrote:The swans were crap they'll finish mid table at best paper thin squad we hammered them yet again poor finishing cost us but we still played well no need to worry cos in Bielsa we trust ..alaw..
pembroke allan wrote:BroBlue wrote:andy 189 wrote:The swans were crap they'll finish mid table at best paper thin squad we hammered them yet again poor finishing cost us but we still played well no need to worry cos in Bielsa we trust ..alaw..
I'm not really sure it counts as 'hammering them' if you actually lose the game, especially considering Leeds had home advantage .
Depends on the game if team as 30 shots on target against one , 30 corners against 1 and 80% possession but that team scores from only shot you could say they were hammered even if they won.... just an example but then its about opinion and as your probably a swans fan that opinion will be different from Andy's ..
BroBlue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:BroBlue wrote:andy 189 wrote:The swans were crap they'll finish mid table at best paper thin squad we hammered them yet again poor finishing cost us but we still played well no need to worry cos in Bielsa we trust ..alaw..
I'm not really sure it counts as 'hammering them' if you actually lose the game, especially considering Leeds had home advantage .
Depends on the game if team as 30 shots on target against one , 30 corners against 1 and 80% possession but that team scores from only shot you could say they were hammered even if they won.... just an example but then its about opinion and as your probably a swans fan that opinion will be different from Andy's ..
Aye I can agree that in this extreme hypothetical situation, the team with 30 shots on target, 30 corners, 80% possesion but loses by 1 goal can be said to have hammered the winners. However back in reality and the game being discussed where Leeds had nowhere near those numbers (3 shots on target vs 2) and lost, it's very hard to argue that they hammered anything.
Users browsing this forum: Bakedalasker, Bytespider [Bot], Cardiff_CPT, cmorris1927, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], Proximic [Bot], Semrush [Bot], Underhill1927, Winchmore Hill Bluebird and 182 guests