pembroke allan wrote:Of the 2k+ used as a figure of people dying of corvid in wales no one actually knows how many have died of it because if your ill with any symptoms or similar they count that person as dying of corvid!! Is using any deaths a scare tactic in wales to prop up WG decision making?
jimmy_rat wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Of the 2k+ used as a figure of people dying of corvid in wales no one actually knows how many have died of it because if your ill with any symptoms or similar they count that person as dying of corvid!! Is using any deaths a scare tactic in wales to prop up WG decision making?
Not just in Wales mate. This is happening everywhere in the UK and from the start. It's why our figures seen high compared to other countries, the way we are reporting deaths is different to say Germany.
I published a very positive study yesterday, which the usual candidates ignored, it showed from a sample in Ireland not a single secondary transmission occured from children in schools with over a 1000 contacts! That's insane.
Another last week, again ignored. Only 253 healthy sub 60 year olds had died, average age over 80 and with 2 pre existing conditions. Kids under ages of 19 only 3 had died. Pretty good odds. To put in comparison they have more chance of getting struck by lightning.
Wont even get into the asymptotic figures.
We're learning more about this virus now. Time to get life moving.
Users browsing this forum: Bluedragon1968, Clickagy [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Proximic [Bot], skiprat, worcester_ccfc and 181 guests