Crayfish wrote:Had one poor game against Fulham but was otherwise very good. Would be happy to have him on a season long loan. Can only get better with more experience.
RageJon wrote:If we could raise enough to buy him that would be a better investment
Blue View wrote:Not for me. The fact he was dropped after the Fulham game and never played again shows he is not a good enough full back to play for us. I think he has the makings of developing into a class centre back especially in a team that plays 3 at the back. We don't play that style and have plenty of centre backs on our books and so need to be looking for a specialist right back instead.
skidemin wrote:Blue View wrote:Not for me. The fact he was dropped after the Fulham game and never played again shows he is not a good enough full back to play for us. I think he has the makings of developing into a class centre back especially in a team that plays 3 at the back. We don't play that style and have plenty of centre backs on our books and so need to be looking for a specialist right back instead.
the penalty clearly effected his confidence in the Fulham game and thought Harris did well to take a young inexperienced player out of the firing line .. not sure it shows anymore than that tbh..
certainly wouldnt write him off on the basis of that..
worcester_ccfc wrote:Very good going forward but still needs to improve defensively.
Can see why Wolves want him to get some more experience out on loan.
Woukd definitely benefit from another season in the Championship and would be pleased if we could keep him for next season.
Has a lot of potential.
Tony Blue Williams wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Very good going forward but still needs to improve defensively.
Can see why Wolves want him to get some more experience out on loan.
Woukd definitely benefit from another season in the Championship and would be pleased if we could keep him for next season.
Has a lot of potential.
I always wonder why players who are described as 'great at going forward but need to improve defensively' are played as a right-back/defender?
Surely the logic would be that the player would make a far better winger/attacker.
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Very good going forward but still needs to improve defensively.
Can see why Wolves want him to get some more experience out on loan.
Woukd definitely benefit from another season in the Championship and would be pleased if we could keep him for next season.
Has a lot of potential.
I always wonder why players who are described as 'great at going forward but need to improve defensively' are played as a right-back/defender?
Surely the logic would be that the player would make a far better winger/attacker.
I think some are better using a bit of pace overlapping rather than being marked as a winger / wide midfielder
Tony Blue Williams wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Very good going forward but still needs to improve defensively.
Can see why Wolves want him to get some more experience out on loan.
Woukd definitely benefit from another season in the Championship and would be pleased if we could keep him for next season.
Has a lot of potential.
I always wonder why players who are described as 'great at going forward but need to improve defensively' are played as a right-back/defender?
Surely the logic would be that the player would make a far better winger/attacker.
I think some are better using a bit of pace overlapping rather than being marked as a winger / wide midfielder
But that doesn't compensate for being poor at defending. Callum Paterson is a classic case he has been far more productive as a forward than he ever was as a right-back and then the ultimate example Gareth Bale.
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Know what you mean re the ability to defend but I was just saying that I’m not sure DS would be good as a winger (which I now realise is not the point you were making)
Tony Blue Williams wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Know what you mean re the ability to defend but I was just saying that I’m not sure DS would be good as a winger (which I now realise is not the point you were making)
Of course there is another option which is to coach Sanderson to be a better defender
Tony Blue Williams wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Know what you mean re the ability to defend but I was just saying that I’m not sure DS would be good as a winger (which I now realise is not the point you were making)
Of course there is another option which is to coach Sanderson to be a better defender
llan bluebird wrote:He reminds me of early Danny Gabbidon. He'll end up centre half but isn't strong enough just yet. He is only an attacking full back because he is young, enthusiastic and athletic enough to do it.
Not a fan of the loan system, better to find your own rather than do the donkey work for the bigger clubs (Wolves now in that category )
Sneggyblubird wrote:It also means big clubs trust Harris to look after their players which is another feather in his cap and can only bode well for us in the future.
Users browsing this forum: 64Ninian, Clickagy [Bot], Google [Bot], ias [Bot], montyblue, mugsy, pembroke allan, Proximic [Bot], Underhill1927 and 175 guests