Wed Sep 09, 2020 6:03 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 7:12 pm
Wed Sep 09, 2020 7:55 pm
nubbsy wrote:Good post. Many who called it from the beginning were laughed at as the majority blindly followed our government who are manipulating stats to pass laws to take away our human rights and impose more control.
Wed Sep 09, 2020 11:25 pm
skidemin wrote:nubbsy wrote:Good post. Many who called it from the beginning were laughed at as the majority blindly followed our government who are manipulating stats to pass laws to take away our human rights and impose more control.
got to say none of this was possible without the public going along with it.. and no one is really interested in what Davids has posted or any other facts or points put forward... the believers believe full stop..
Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:04 am
bluesince62 wrote:skidemin wrote:nubbsy wrote:Good post. Many who called it from the beginning were laughed at as the majority blindly followed our government who are manipulating stats to pass laws to take away our human rights and impose more control.
got to say none of this was possible without the public going along with it.. and no one is really interested in what Davids has posted or any other facts or points put forward... the believers believe full stop..
Got to agree,great post by davids,but the lack of replies shows how people are not interested,in anything other than what they are being fed daily by msm,did as asked 1st time around,mainly to protect my mother,who is high risk,but have np been watching and reading on a daily basis,and come to the same conclusion regards population control,some are waking up,but not enough imho.
If BLM and the likes are allowed to protest,then why aren't we? Also Muslim women march (video link was on here somewhere) were allowed to do so,it's about time we stood up to this shit,before the b@stars remove all our freedoms and rights.
Thu Sep 10, 2020 6:59 am
Thu Sep 10, 2020 7:00 am
Thu Sep 10, 2020 7:13 am
Thu Sep 10, 2020 7:34 am
Igovernor wrote:OH! Please, conspiracy rules supreme. Please save our freedom what wars were fought for to preserve it.
This Covid19 is a hoax perpetuated to control the masses If it was not so serious it would be laughable. Some one posts and talks about doing what the government says, more likely follow the pied piper. To much time on peoples hands. It seems to me that common sense has gone out of the window. Please try and think for yourself. To believe that it is all a big conspiracy by a government, is absolutely ridiculous. People that have it in their head that it is all about taking away our freedoms are living in cloud cuckoo land. But you believe what you want to believe and I will use all my life experience to decide what is real and what is not, I have seen to many people die, to not believe that Covid19 is not a real threat. I just hope when the Winter and the new year comes, that you will not be proved wrong!
Thu Sep 10, 2020 11:45 am
ManInBlack wrote:Don't think the families of the million people worldwide who died and the next million ... will agree with this David Ike looney tunes conspiracy theory.
Thu Sep 10, 2020 11:56 am
Thu Sep 10, 2020 12:38 pm
Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:The fact the lockdown has been eased and we are only having infections of such little amount a day speaks volumes. Yet when the lockdown was in place and people were told to stay indoors the numbers were in the thousands. How is that possible if people are not able to pass it on to others. I’ve had a gutsful of all this COVID now, and I’m glad the minority are slowly becoming the majority in realising that we must carry on with our lives.
Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:30 am
Fri Sep 11, 2020 6:57 am
davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Fri Sep 11, 2020 7:04 am
Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Fri Sep 11, 2020 8:53 am
davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
Fri Sep 11, 2020 9:03 am
davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
Fri Sep 11, 2020 9:53 am
pembroke allan wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
NO mention fact everyone is panicking to get
tested so cases will rise? As this virus is going be with us for months ... seems rather pointless unlocking things then 4wks later lock down again as cases have risen..... because every time you allow people to mix cases will rise .... at some point got to go pass that point otherwise country will grind to a halt with people to scared to leave house to work kids to school ect ect, and if wait until vaccine is available sometime never is a long time to wait...
Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:03 am
skidemin wrote:pembroke allan wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
NO mention fact everyone is panicking to get
tested so cases will rise? As this virus is going be with us for months ... seems rather pointless unlocking things then 4wks later lock down again as cases have risen..... because every time you allow people to mix cases will rise .... at some point got to go pass that point otherwise country will grind to a halt with people to scared to leave house to work kids to school ect ect, and if wait until vaccine is available sometime never is a long time to wait...
genuinely shocked....who would have thought testing more people would produce more positive test results..
Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:18 am
Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:22 am
pembroke allan wrote:skidemin wrote:pembroke allan wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
NO mention fact everyone is panicking to get
tested so cases will rise? As this virus is going be with us for months ... seems rather pointless unlocking things then 4wks later lock down again as cases have risen..... because every time you allow people to mix cases will rise .... at some point got to go pass that point otherwise country will grind to a halt with people to scared to leave house to work kids to school ect ect, and if wait until vaccine is available sometime never is a long time to wait...
genuinely shocked....who would have thought testing more people would produce more positive test results..
Obviously no one thats why theres panic everywhere ...
Fri Sep 11, 2020 10:30 am
Bluebird-in-Jackland wrote:Cases are slightly on the rise in the last week. But how can the tables below suggest that a lockdown works? As since we’ve come out of lockdown the numbers have never got anywhere near numbers during lockdown. And you can’t give the two weeks case as the lockdown was a lot longer yet the number were high for a few weeks.
Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:50 am
Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
This bit "Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales"
They have gone up not down!
Fri Sep 11, 2020 11:55 am
davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
This bit "Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales"
They have gone up not down!
So it was 165 new infections on Tuesday and 102 new infections on Wednesday and that's an increase?
I knew I should have listened a bit better at maths in school though I suppose I should be grateful I was actually able to go to school when I was younger.
Perhaps I should have been clearer and said that there was a fall in the number of daily infections from 165 on Tuesday to 102 on Wednesday - am I still wrong on that?
Fri Sep 11, 2020 12:24 pm
davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
This bit "Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales"
They have gone up not down!
So it was 165 new infections on Tuesday and 102 new infections on Wednesday and that's an increase?
I knew I should have listened a bit better at maths in school though I suppose I should be grateful I was actually able to go to school when I was younger.
Perhaps I should have been clearer and said that there was a fall in the number of daily infections from 165 on Tuesday to 102 on Wednesday - am I still wrong on that?
Fri Sep 11, 2020 12:37 pm
Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
This bit "Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales"
They have gone up not down!
So it was 165 new infections on Tuesday and 102 new infections on Wednesday and that's an increase?
I knew I should have listened a bit better at maths in school though I suppose I should be grateful I was actually able to go to school when I was younger.
Perhaps I should have been clearer and said that there was a fall in the number of daily infections from 165 on Tuesday to 102 on Wednesday - am I still wrong on that?
Yes you should have said Tuesday, instead of a post today saying yesterday (Thursday). I really am sorry I am not clairvoyant
Fri Sep 11, 2020 1:05 pm
Welshcake wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
This bit "Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales"
They have gone up not down!
So it was 165 new infections on Tuesday and 102 new infections on Wednesday and that's an increase?
I knew I should have listened a bit better at maths in school though I suppose I should be grateful I was actually able to go to school when I was younger.
Perhaps I should have been clearer and said that there was a fall in the number of daily infections from 165 on Tuesday to 102 on Wednesday - am I still wrong on that?
PHW had an error in reporting yesterday, expect a higher number today.
I've said it on here before but giving a public platform for conspiracy theorists and covid deniers is dangerous. Please take your information from reliable sources.
Fri Sep 11, 2020 2:00 pm
Fri Sep 11, 2020 2:29 pm
davids wrote:Latest from PHW
165 cases reported on Wednesday
102 on Thursday (they said the data was "incomplete" on Thursday so that should be discounted)
130 reported today.
So even ignoring yesterdays cock up by PHW Wales the daily rate is today lower than on Wednesday.
Being reported by Wales ONline as "another rise in positive cases across Wales".
Again - how is 130 more than 165?
Fri Sep 11, 2020 2:30 pm
skidemin wrote:Welshcake wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Igovernor wrote:davids wrote:Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales of over a third, down from 165 the previous day to 102.
Drakeford's reaction? Following Boris and Sturgeon in imposing tougher restrictions and making face masks compulsory in all shops.
Might as well all just stay safe in our houses for the rest of our lives and forget work, socialising, ever seeing friends or family again except over a video link.
Wrong
The latest figures published on Thursday show that there have been 19.5 infections for every 100,000 people in the last week in Wales - a significant rise on the low point of just 3.7 in mid August.
Which part of my post was wrong?
Was the fact that there were a third less infections on Wednesday than there were on Tuesday wrong?
This bit "Yesterdays figures show a decrease in new infections in Wales"
They have gone up not down!
So it was 165 new infections on Tuesday and 102 new infections on Wednesday and that's an increase?
I knew I should have listened a bit better at maths in school though I suppose I should be grateful I was actually able to go to school when I was younger.
Perhaps I should have been clearer and said that there was a fall in the number of daily infections from 165 on Tuesday to 102 on Wednesday - am I still wrong on that?
PHW had an error in reporting yesterday, expect a higher number today.
I've said it on here before but giving a public platform for conspiracy theorists and covid deniers is dangerous. Please take your information from reliable sources.
reliable sources like fullfact.org ..........