Barclay1 wrote:Annis, I have no doubt that the two players are youth players we are promoting to 1st team squad members.
Also, did not Dalman at one point, admittedly a while back, say that the Sala fee was ringfenced?
Also saying he wants Ojo and Wilson back? He knows they won't be back so what is he trying to prove and to whom? That he is one of the fans? Rememner this is a guy who lives out of London and almost acquired Charlton?
Yes, the debt it to Tan, but he has run it up at a rate of knots during his tenure and is not looking to relinquish his control any time soon. Just because it is owed to Tan doesn't make the debt any less.
rumpo kid wrote:Need to define what ‘taking money out’ actually means. It’s sometimes not the same as being paid.
wez1927 wrote:Great interview, basically we don't owe any money other than to vt also only Ken choo gets paid on the board
Igovernor wrote:Tried to put interview on here, but I am useless at all this technology
Annis here you go
https://www.facebook.com/watch/live/?v= ... _permalink
AfricanBluebird wrote:rumpo kid wrote:Need to define what ‘taking money out’ actually means. It’s sometimes not the same as being paid.
Exactly Rumpo... see my above comment. It may not be a salary but there are plenty of ways of getting money out of an organisation. consultancy fees, expenses, allowances etc
Bluebird1977 wrote:Last set of accounts showed nearly 40 million owed to other debts that's without what VT is owed ( when he calls it in or whatever he does) yet dalman said we only owe one man. Are you telling me he's paid whoever this 39.5 million off since last April to "others".
Don't believe a word he says tbh. We had an extension yet still not put them in so it will be a fine and more money owed. Madness
Barclay1 wrote:Annis, I have no doubt that the two players are youth players we are promoting to 1st team squad members.
Also, did not Dalman at one point, admittedly a while back, say that the Sala fee was ringfenced?
Also saying he wants Ojo and Wilson back? He knows they won't be back so what is he trying to prove and to whom? That he is one of the fans? Rememner this is a guy who lives out of London and almost acquired Charlton?
Yes, the debt it to Tan, but he has run it up at a rate of knots during his tenure and is not looking to relinquish his control any time soon. Just because it is owed to Tan doesn't make the debt any less.
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Great interview, basically we don't owe any money other than to vt also only Ken choo gets paid on the board
So what about the other £39m debt that is not against Tans name?
Barclay1 wrote:I'm not happy at what is happening behind the scenes at the club.
For me personally, it all spirals back to the question of our Premier league money and where that went.
Admìttedly there are a number of claims, counter claims and rumours, because that's all we have to go on, but I'd love an independent to go in and find out just what is going on, what went on, and where we are headed.
maccydee wrote:Barclay1 wrote:I'm not happy at what is happening behind the scenes at the club.
For me personally, it all spirals back to the question of our Premier league money and where that went.
Admìttedly there are a number of claims, counter claims and rumours, because that's all we have to go on, but I'd love an independent to go in and find out just what is going on, what went on, and where we are headed.
The £500 million?
Users browsing this forum: Bytespider [Bot], Clickagy [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Igovernor, jason perrys legs, Magpie [Bot], northside of risca, pembroke allan, Proximic [Bot] and 220 guests