worcester_ccfc wrote:wez1927 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:wez1927 wrote:Basically without covid we would of broke even ,not too bad I think
That's absolute rubbish and you know it.
These accounts cover a very short period of Covid. If the whole Covid period was represented, they would be far worse.
More bullshit from Dalman when he said the only debt we had was to Tan (even though Tan said we'd be debt free by now).
The other debtors aren't registered charges at companies house but they're still debts.
In these accounts, Tan has still not converted any of our debts to him to shares.
The money taken out of the club by these people is a disgrace.
Did you not read kieths piece or are you just ignoring the fact that the loss was down to having to reimburse tv monies and other costs due to covid ? So it not rubbish at all the only charges are Tan and thats a fact the 39 million debt is Tans company too ,do the research please tan borrowed the club 39 million in the season we went up against future TV monies for cash flow it was in the last accounts
I did read it. Did you, or did you just pick the bits out that you want to hear?
My point was that this is a very short of covid represented, and next year will be a lot worse. My comment of "absolute rubbish" was you saying that it's not too bad.
Most of the debts may well be to Tan's companies (even though he promised we'd be debt free).
Not forgetting the small amount of money we owe in future transfer fees and all the money we'll have to pay when we lose the Sala case.
But it's pointless even talking to you about it, you'll defend Tan no matter what.
It's no point talking to you tbh , you just hate the club and put it down at every opportunity, my comment on not to bad I stand by, as Keith said I his review of the accounts , we would of broken even which I thought was great without covid !